Occlusive Retinal Vasculitis Following Intravitreal Brolucizumab.

anti-VEGF agents branch retinal artery occlusion central retinal artery occlusion uveitis vitritis

Journal

Journal of vitreoretinal diseases
ISSN: 2474-1264
Titre abrégé: J Vitreoretin Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101700301

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Historique:
entrez: 14 8 2020
pubmed: 14 8 2020
medline: 14 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To analyze a case series of retinal vasculitis reported to the American Society of Retina Specialists (ASRS) following Food and Drug Administration approval of brolucizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The ASRS Research and Safety in Therapeutics Committee analyzed clinical and imaging characteristics from submitted reports of retinal vasculitis after brolucizumab. Retinal vasculitis was reported in 26 eyes of 25 patients (22 [88%] female) after treatment with brolucizumab. Imaging studies were available for 24 of 26 eyes. Most cases (92%) were associated with intraocular inflammation, which presented at a mean of 25 days (range, 3-63 days) after the most recent brolucizumab injection. Mean visual acuity (VA) was 20/52 (range, 20/25-4/200) before the adverse event, 20/151 (range, 20/25-hand motion) at presentation of the adverse event, and 20/243 (range, 20/30-light perception) at last follow-up. Twelve eyes (46%) had a greater than 3-line decrease in VA at final follow-up, and 12 eyes (46%) had a final VA of 20/200 or worse. Analysis of retinal imaging identified vasculopathy that involved retinal arteries (91%), retinal veins (79%), and choroidal vessels (48%). Occlusive disease was apparent on imaging in 83% of eyes. Treatment approaches were varied. Retinal vasculitis has been identified in a series of eyes following brolucizumab. Although a few eyes in this series were asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic, some eyes had significant vision loss. A careful examination for signs of active inflammation prior to brolucizumab injection is recommended. Once vasculopathy is suspected, angiographic imaging may help define the spectrum of involvement. Optimal treatment strategies remain unknown.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32789284
doi: 10.1177/2474126420930863
pmc: PMC7418897
mid: NIHMS1615442
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

269-279

Subventions

Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : R01 EY027691
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Relevant potential conflicts of interest are reported as follows: A.J.W.: none; P.H.: Genentech (consultant, lecture fees) and Allergan (consultant); T.G.M.: none; J.F.A.: Springer SBM LLC (patents/royalties), DORC International B.V. (consultant, lecture fees), Allergan Inc (consultant, lecture fees), Bayer (consultant, lecture fees), Mallinckrodt (consultant), and TOPCON (grant support); K.J.B.: Bausch&Lomb (consultant, lecture fees), Allergan (consultant, lecture fees), Regeneron (consultant, lecture fees), Novartis (consultant, lecture fees), and Genentech (consultant); N.C.: Allergan (consultant), Bayer (consultant), Novartis (consultant); G.G.E.: Novartis (stock), and Regeneron (stock); R.A.G: Genentech (research, speaker, advisory), Regeneron (advisory), Novartis (research, speaker, advisory), Allergan (research, speaker, advisory), Aerie (research), Santen (research), Graybug (research), and NovoNordisk (research); S.J.K.: none; J.P.: none; E.W.S.: none; H.T.: Alimera (stock); R.W.W.: Novartis (research).

Références

Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct;158(4):733-737.e1
pubmed: 24983791
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):421-6
pubmed: 25590968
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020 Apr 02;18:100687
pubmed: 32280811
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013 May;24(3):205-12
pubmed: 23518613
Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:943409
pubmed: 24307762
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 May 09;52(6):3046-50
pubmed: 21051706
Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 Sep;3(9):753-759
pubmed: 31153850
BMC Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct 21;13:60
pubmed: 24144403
Ophthalmology. 2020 Jan;127(1):72-84
pubmed: 30986442
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;188:131-140
pubmed: 29425799
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019 May 1;50(5):288-294
pubmed: 31100159
Ophthalmology. 2017 May;124(5):583-595
pubmed: 28110950
Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Apr;93(4):457-62
pubmed: 19033289
Acta Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov;88(7):730-5
pubmed: 20039854
Retina. 2010 Feb;30(2):332-8
pubmed: 20175274
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;97(6):e938-e939
pubmed: 30810272
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020 Mar 31;18:100680
pubmed: 32258827

Auteurs

Andre J Witkin (AJ)

Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Paul Hahn (P)

NJ Retina, Teaneck, NJ, USA.

Timothy G Murray (TG)

Murray Ocular Oncology and Retina, Miami, FL, USA.

J Fernando Arevalo (JF)

Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Kevin J Blinder (KJ)

The Retina Institute, St Louis, MO, USA.

Netan Choudhry (N)

Vitreous Retina Macula Specialists of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Geoff G Emerson (GG)

Retina Center of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Roger A Goldberg (RA)

Bay Area Retina Associates, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.

Stephen J Kim (SJ)

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Joel Pearlman (J)

Retinal Consultants, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Eric W Schneider (EW)

Tennessee Retina, Nashville, TN, USA.

Homayoun Tabandeh (H)

Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Robert W Wong (RW)

Austin Retina Associates, Austin, TX, USA.

Classifications MeSH