Delivering HDAC over 3 or 5 days as consolidation in AML impacts health care resource consumption but not outcome.
Journal
Blood advances
ISSN: 2473-9537
Titre abrégé: Blood Adv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101698425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 08 2020
25 08 2020
Historique:
received:
01
06
2020
accepted:
14
07
2020
entrez:
14
8
2020
pubmed:
14
8
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Postremission treatment is crucial to prevent relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). High-dose cytarabine delivered every 12 hours on days 1, 3, and 5 (HDAC-135) is the standard of care for younger adult patients with AML. Although this standard has been unsuccessfully challenged by other treatment regimens, including multiagent chemotherapy, the timing of HDAC administration has attracted little attention. Here, we retrospectively compared the safety, efficacy, and health care resource consumption associated with HDAC-135 and another standard, condensed HDAC-123 regimen, as consolidation treatment in younger AML patients in first complete response. This study included 221 patients (median age, 46.6 years; range, 18-60 years). HDAC-123 and HDAC-135 were used in 92 and 129 patients, respectively. Both regimens were associated with similar rates of relapse-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, nonrelapse mortality, and overall survival, including in core binding factor AML subgroup in which levels of minimal residual disease reduction were similar in both schedules. Hematological recovery times regarding neutrophils and platelets were significantly shorter in patients receiving HDAC-123, with an average difference of 3 to 4 days for each consolidation cycle. The total duration of hospitalization for the whole postremission program was shorter with HDAC-123 (32 days; interquartile ratio [IQR], 22.0,36.5) compared with HDAC-135 (41 days; IQR, 30.5, 50.0) (P < .0001). In conclusion, the condensed HDAC-123 regimen induced faster hematological recovery and therefore significantly reduced the length of hospital stay without affecting treatment response or outcome in younger AML patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32790847
pii: S2473-9529(20)31143-5
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002511
pmc: PMC7448603
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3840-3849Informations de copyright
© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 10;30(29):3604-10
pubmed: 22965967
Isr J Med Sci. 1988 Sep-Oct;24(9-10):533-8
pubmed: 3060443
Cancer Chemother Rep. 1964 Feb;35:1-111
pubmed: 14117037
Ann Oncol. 1993 Sep;4(8):651-6
pubmed: 7694634
Blood. 2017 Jan 26;129(4):424-447
pubmed: 27895058
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 20;31(27):3360-8
pubmed: 23940227
Ann Hematol. 2016 Dec;95(12):1931-1942
pubmed: 27696203
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):911-8
pubmed: 19124805
BMC Cancer. 2008 Jul 10;8:195
pubmed: 18616811
Blood Cancer J. 2017 Nov 29;7(12):635
pubmed: 29184070
Blood. 1998 Oct 1;92(7):2322-33
pubmed: 9746770
Blood. 2016 May 19;127(20):2391-405
pubmed: 27069254
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 1;29(19):2696-702
pubmed: 21606413
Blood Cancer J. 2017 May 26;7(5):e564
pubmed: 28548643
N Engl J Med. 1994 Oct 6;331(14):896-903
pubmed: 8078551