Movement Restriction and Increased Surveillance as Efficient Measures to Control the Spread of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Backyard Productive Systems in Central Chile.

backyard production systems disease modeling highly pathogenic avian influenza movement restrictions surveillance

Journal

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 15 10 2019
accepted: 12 06 2020
entrez: 15 8 2020
pubmed: 15 8 2020
medline: 15 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

During the last 5 years there has been an alarming number of reports of highly pathogenic avian influenza worldwide. However, little is known about the status of this disease in South America. Chile has been the only country in South America where an HPAI outbreak was reported. This outbreak occurred in 2002 and was due to an H7N3 HPAI, where the most plausible hypothesis that explained the entrance of the disease to the country, had relation to migratory wild birds. Commercial poultry farms in Chile are highly integrated and have high biosecurity standards. Nevertheless, poultry backyard production systems lack biosecurity measures and are widely distributed. Since 2002 outbreak, avian influenza viruses have been identified in wild birds and different animal species kept in backyard productive systems (BPS) in Chile. The aim of this study was to simulate the possible natural history of HPAI after its introduction to BPS in central Chile and to simulate different intervention strategies. To do so, the North American Animal Disease Spread Model version 3.3 was used. The results showed that a median of 15,930 BPS would be affected if HPAI spread among BPS in central Chile, representing 97.8% of the current amount of BPS existing in study zone. Movement restrictions, pre-emptive destruction, passive surveillance, tracing of infected premises and combinations of the three, where the intervention strategies tested in the simulation model. From all the interventions simulated, movement restrictions together with increasing surveillance (through increasing passive surveillance and good tracing of infected premises) had the biggest effect, reducing the median number of infected BPS in 90.8%. However, more studies are needed to more accurately estimate local contact rates. These results can guide the official veterinary services to consider potential mechanisms to control or prevent an HPAI emergency situation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32793648
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00424
pmc: PMC7393644
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

424

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Di Pillo, Jimenez-Bluhm, Baumberger, Marambio, Galdames, Monti, Schultz-Cherry and Hamilton-West.

Références

Vaccine. 2007 Jul 26;25(30):5637-44
pubmed: 17126960
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56851
pubmed: 23437257
Rev Sci Tech. 2011 Aug;30(2):499-512
pubmed: 21961221
Vet Ital. 2008 Oct-Dec;44(4):657-69
pubmed: 20411493
Vet Rec. 2005 Feb 26;156(9):292
pubmed: 15765907
J Infect Dis. 2004 Dec 15;190(12):2088-95
pubmed: 15551206
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Jul 1;110(3-4):510-24
pubmed: 23398856
J Virol. 2006 Aug;80(15):7760-4
pubmed: 16840356
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Mar 1;113(4):376-97
pubmed: 24462191
BMC Vet Res. 2012 Dec 07;8:240
pubmed: 23216706
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018 Mar 29;7(1):44
pubmed: 29593259
Vet Microbiol. 2000 May 22;74(1-2):3-13
pubmed: 10799774
Virus Res. 2015 Mar 2;199:42-5
pubmed: 25602438
Prev Vet Med. 2018 May 1;153:1-6
pubmed: 29653729
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Mar 1;164:41-48
pubmed: 30771893
Avian Dis. 2010 Mar;54(1 Suppl):707-12
pubmed: 20521719
Acta Trop. 2011 Jun;118(3):209-16
pubmed: 21459074
Acta Trop. 2013 Apr;126(1):43-53
pubmed: 23337390
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8(1):479-485
pubmed: 30924394
Acta Trop. 2002 Jul;83(1):7-11
pubmed: 12062787
Avian Pathol. 2006 Jun;35(3):189-205
pubmed: 16753610
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2012 Feb 13;6(2):156-65
pubmed: 22337845
Prev Vet Med. 2007 Dec 14;82(3-4):176-97
pubmed: 17614148
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Jul;32(4):275-86
pubmed: 18456328
Prev Vet Med. 2015 Sep 1;121(1-2):142-50
pubmed: 26087887
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Nov 1;134:211-215
pubmed: 27726887
Zoonoses Public Health. 2012 Mar;59(2):139-43
pubmed: 21824379
Res Vet Sci. 2012 Aug;93(1):121-4
pubmed: 21752410

Auteurs

Francisca Di Pillo (F)

Nucleo de Investigaciones Aplicadas en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas, Universidad de Las Américas, Santiago, Chile.

Pedro Jimenez-Bluhm (P)

Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Cecilia Baumberger (C)

Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Víctor Marambio (V)

Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Pablo Galdames (P)

Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Gustavo Monti (G)

Instituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.

Stacey Schultz-Cherry (S)

Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States.

Christopher Hamilton-West (C)

Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Classifications MeSH