Rural-urban differences in the mental health of perinatal women: a UK-based cross-sectional study.


Journal

BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Aug 2020
Historique:
received: 06 03 2020
accepted: 23 07 2020
entrez: 16 8 2020
pubmed: 17 8 2020
medline: 21 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

International data suggest that living in a rural area is associated with an increased risk of perinatal mental illness. This study tested the association between rurality and risk for two mental illnesses prevalent in perinatal women - depression and anxiety. Using a cross-sectional design, antenatal and postnatal women were approached by healthcare professionals and through other networks in a county in Northern England (UK). After providing informed consent, women completed a questionnaire where they indicated their postcode (used to determine rural-urban status) and completed three outcome measures: the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Whooley questions (depression measure), and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD-2). Logistic regression models were developed, both unadjusted and adjusted for potential confounders, including socioeconomic status, social support and perinatal stage. Two hundred ninety-five participants provided valid data. Women in rural areas (n = 130) were mostly comparable to their urban counterparts (n = 165). Risk for depression and/or anxiety was found to be higher in the rural group across all models: unadjusted OR 1.67 (0.42) 95% CI 1.03 to 2.72, p = .038. This difference though indicative did not reach statistical significance after adjusting for socioeconomic status and perinatal stage (OR 1.57 (0.40), 95% CI 0.95 to 2.58, p = .078), and for social support (OR 1.65 (0.46), 95% CI 0.96 to 2.84, p = .070). Data suggested that women in rural areas were at higher risk of depression and anxiety than their urban counterparts. Further work should be undertaken to corroborate these findings and investigate the underlying factors. This will help inform future interventions and the allocation of perinatal services to where they are most needed.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
International data suggest that living in a rural area is associated with an increased risk of perinatal mental illness. This study tested the association between rurality and risk for two mental illnesses prevalent in perinatal women - depression and anxiety.
METHODS METHODS
Using a cross-sectional design, antenatal and postnatal women were approached by healthcare professionals and through other networks in a county in Northern England (UK). After providing informed consent, women completed a questionnaire where they indicated their postcode (used to determine rural-urban status) and completed three outcome measures: the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Whooley questions (depression measure), and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD-2). Logistic regression models were developed, both unadjusted and adjusted for potential confounders, including socioeconomic status, social support and perinatal stage.
RESULTS RESULTS
Two hundred ninety-five participants provided valid data. Women in rural areas (n = 130) were mostly comparable to their urban counterparts (n = 165). Risk for depression and/or anxiety was found to be higher in the rural group across all models: unadjusted OR 1.67 (0.42) 95% CI 1.03 to 2.72, p = .038. This difference though indicative did not reach statistical significance after adjusting for socioeconomic status and perinatal stage (OR 1.57 (0.40), 95% CI 0.95 to 2.58, p = .078), and for social support (OR 1.65 (0.46), 95% CI 0.96 to 2.84, p = .070).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Data suggested that women in rural areas were at higher risk of depression and anxiety than their urban counterparts. Further work should be undertaken to corroborate these findings and investigate the underlying factors. This will help inform future interventions and the allocation of perinatal services to where they are most needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32795335
doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03132-2
pii: 10.1186/s12884-020-03132-2
pmc: PMC7427846
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

464

Subventions

Organisme : Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health
ID : MR/K02325X/1

Références

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;46(12):1243-9
pubmed: 20924554
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2016 Jun;30(3):418-24
pubmed: 27256951
PLoS One. 2008 Mar 12;3(3):e1788
pubmed: 18335058
Evid Based Med. 2007 Oct;12(5):149
pubmed: 17909240
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2006 Nov;9(6):309-15
pubmed: 17013761
J Affect Disord. 2004 May;80(1):65-73
pubmed: 15094259
Demography. 2015 Feb;52(1):83-111
pubmed: 25573169
J Rural Health. 2009 Fall;25(4):342-51
pubmed: 19780913
J Rural Health. 2011 Summer;27(3):278-88
pubmed: 21729155
Ethn Health. 2003 Aug;8(3):207-21
pubmed: 14577996
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 09;5(12):e008913
pubmed: 26656018
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 13;17(1):28
pubmed: 28086827
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1995 May;30(3):121-6
pubmed: 7624805
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 May;119(5):350-64
pubmed: 19298573
Women Birth. 2016 Feb;29(1):62-71
pubmed: 26346905
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Oct;32(20):3336-3342
pubmed: 29631462
Aust J Rural Health. 2008 Apr;16(2):56-66
pubmed: 18318846
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Feb 1;90(2):139G-149G
pubmed: 22423165
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016 Oct;19(5):711-20
pubmed: 27085795
J Public Health Dent. 2016 Winter;76(1):56-64
pubmed: 26270155
Health Place. 2014 Nov;30:226-33
pubmed: 25460905
Am J Community Psychol. 2000 Jun;28(3):391-400
pubmed: 10945123
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Jul;12(7):439-45
pubmed: 9229283
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Sep;109(9):1566-75
pubmed: 19699836
Psychiatr Q. 2011 Mar;82(1):69-84
pubmed: 20814742
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Oct;62(603):e671-8
pubmed: 23265226
J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7
pubmed: 2280326

Auteurs

Samuel Ginja (S)

School of Psychology, Ulster University, Cromore Road, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland, UK. s.ginja@ulster.ac.uk.

Katherine Jackson (K)

Department of Sociology, Durham University, 29 Old Elvet, Durham, DH1 3HN, England, UK.

James J Newham (JJ)

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumberland Building, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, England, UK.

Emily J Henderson (EJ)

Children & Young People's Mental Health & Wellbeing, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7XA, England, UK.
Social Work, Education & Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7XA, England, UK.

Debbie Smart (D)

Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, England, UK.

Raghu Lingam (R)

Population Child Health Clinical Research Group, School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Rm 814, Level 8 The Bright Alliance, High St & Avoca Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH