Retrospective and prospective evaluations of drought and flood.

Google Trends Public awareness Public risk evaluation Standard Precipitation Index Survey research

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Dec 2020
Historique:
received: 03 03 2020
revised: 12 06 2020
accepted: 19 07 2020
pubmed: 18 8 2020
medline: 18 8 2020
entrez: 18 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Climate extremes will be intensified and become more frequent. One of the regions where this is the case is the U.S. Gulf coast region. This region is susceptible to the impacts of climate extremes. This region has recently experienced large amounts of economic damages caused by high-impact hurricanes and floods. Meanwhile, drought can also pose serious risks once it occurs. By using a 2019 U.S. Gulf Coast survey combined with Standard Precipitation Index, we closely examined retrospective and prospective evaluations of drought and flood among coastal residents. Drawing upon literature on human-environment system, we were interested in how the objective conditions of past drought and flood influenced individual's perceptions of these hazards and how their retrospective evaluations were correlated with their prospective evaluations of future trends of these hazards. Coastal residents' retrospective evaluations of past drought and flood were found to be influenced by historic objective conditions. Higher drought frequencies were found to increase the probability of perceiving increasing trend of drought number in the past. Higher flood frequencies were found to decrease the probability of perceiving increasing trend of flood number in the past. Higher intensities of drought and flood were found to increase the probabilities of perceiving increasing trends of drought duration and flood amount in the past. Coastal residents' prospective evaluations of future drought and flood were found to be influenced by retrospective evaluations of these hazards, suggesting the temporal continuity in human judgment. Moreover, those who relied on a longer time span in reference to the future were found to be more likely to perceive increasing trends of drought and flood. We ended this paper by proposing a theoretical framework to guide future studies and discussing policy implications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32798859
pii: S0048-9697(20)34684-2
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141155
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

141155

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Wanyun Shao (W)

Department of Geography, University of Alabama, United States of America. Electronic address: wshao1@ua.edu.

Jonghun Kam (J)

Division of Environmental Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, South Korea; Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama, United States of America.

Classifications MeSH