Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Calprotectin Concentration in Evaluating Therapeutic Outcomes of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.


Journal

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
ISSN: 1542-7714
Titre abrégé: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101160775

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2021
Historique:
received: 30 01 2020
revised: 06 07 2020
accepted: 06 08 2020
pubmed: 18 8 2020
medline: 11 11 2021
entrez: 18 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Histologic features of inflammation (histologic inflammation) are associated with clinical relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Concentration of fecal calprotectin (FC) can be used to identify patients with mucosal inflammation. We aimed to assess the accuracy of FC measurements in identifying patients with histologic inflammation and to develop a model to predict outcomes of therapy. We performed a post hoc analysis of data from a phase 4 trial of the efficacy of multimatrix mesalamine in patients with mild to moderate UC (the MOMENTUM trial). We obtained clinical, endoscopic, and histologic data from week 8 (n = 639) and week 52 (n = 373) of the trial. We used area under the receiver operating characteristic curves to determine the accuracy and optimal cut-off values of FC in identifying patients with different therapeutic outcomes (clinical remission, endoscopic healing, deep remission, or histologic remission) at week 8 and week 52. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with these outcomes. Median FC concentrations were lower in patients who achieved outcomes of clinical remission, endoscopic healing, deep remission, or histologic remission vs patients who did not. FC concentrations identified patients with endoscopic healing and histologic remission with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.77 and 0.76 at week 8, and 0.79 and 0.80 at week 52, respectively. The optimal FC cut-off concentrations for identification of patients with histologic remission were 75 μg/g at week 8 and 99 μg/g at week 52. In the subpopulation with an endoscopy score of 0, median FC concentrations were lower in patients with histologic remission than in patients with microscopic inflammation at week 8 (30 vs 140 μg/g; area under the receiver operating characteristic, 0.72) and week 52 (21.5 vs 134.5 μg/g; area under the receiver operating characteristic, 0.71). At both time points, the optimal FC cut-off concentration was approximately 75 μg/g. Our final prediction model for week 52 histologic remission comprised endoscopic score at week 8, FC concentration at week 8, and histologic activity at baseline and week 8. A post hoc analysis of data from a phase 4 trial found that, even in patients with complete endoscopic healing of UC, FC concentration can be used to discriminate patients with ongoing microscopic inflammation from patients with histologic remission. The optimal cut-off concentration of FC is between 75 and 100 μg/g. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01124149.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND & AIMS
Histologic features of inflammation (histologic inflammation) are associated with clinical relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Concentration of fecal calprotectin (FC) can be used to identify patients with mucosal inflammation. We aimed to assess the accuracy of FC measurements in identifying patients with histologic inflammation and to develop a model to predict outcomes of therapy.
METHODS
We performed a post hoc analysis of data from a phase 4 trial of the efficacy of multimatrix mesalamine in patients with mild to moderate UC (the MOMENTUM trial). We obtained clinical, endoscopic, and histologic data from week 8 (n = 639) and week 52 (n = 373) of the trial. We used area under the receiver operating characteristic curves to determine the accuracy and optimal cut-off values of FC in identifying patients with different therapeutic outcomes (clinical remission, endoscopic healing, deep remission, or histologic remission) at week 8 and week 52. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with these outcomes.
RESULTS
Median FC concentrations were lower in patients who achieved outcomes of clinical remission, endoscopic healing, deep remission, or histologic remission vs patients who did not. FC concentrations identified patients with endoscopic healing and histologic remission with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.77 and 0.76 at week 8, and 0.79 and 0.80 at week 52, respectively. The optimal FC cut-off concentrations for identification of patients with histologic remission were 75 μg/g at week 8 and 99 μg/g at week 52. In the subpopulation with an endoscopy score of 0, median FC concentrations were lower in patients with histologic remission than in patients with microscopic inflammation at week 8 (30 vs 140 μg/g; area under the receiver operating characteristic, 0.72) and week 52 (21.5 vs 134.5 μg/g; area under the receiver operating characteristic, 0.71). At both time points, the optimal FC cut-off concentration was approximately 75 μg/g. Our final prediction model for week 52 histologic remission comprised endoscopic score at week 8, FC concentration at week 8, and histologic activity at baseline and week 8.
CONCLUSIONS
A post hoc analysis of data from a phase 4 trial found that, even in patients with complete endoscopic healing of UC, FC concentration can be used to discriminate patients with ongoing microscopic inflammation from patients with histologic remission. The optimal cut-off concentration of FC is between 75 and 100 μg/g. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01124149.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32801008
pii: S1542-3565(20)31128-9
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.019
pmc: PMC8140548
mid: NIHMS1697617
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers 0
Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex 0

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01124149']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2333-2342

Subventions

Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK061931
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK068271
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Gastroenterology. 2016 Jan;150(1):96-102
pubmed: 26376350
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jun;17(7):1265-1275.e8
pubmed: 30583048
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun;110(6):802-19; quiz 820
pubmed: 25964225
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep;110(9):1324-38
pubmed: 26303131
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Apr;47(7):922-939
pubmed: 29411405
J Crohns Colitis. 2017 Jul 1;11(7):769-784
pubmed: 28513805
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012 Dec;18(12):2218-24
pubmed: 22344983
J Crohns Colitis. 2016 Aug;10(8):925-33
pubmed: 26908939
J Crohns Colitis. 2012 Jun;6(5):557-62
pubmed: 22398050
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 May;111(5):685-90
pubmed: 26977756
Gut. 2000 Sep;47(3):404-9
pubmed: 10940279
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017 Sep;23(9):1600-1604
pubmed: 28590341
J Crohns Colitis. 2018 Mar 28;12(4):425-431
pubmed: 29240880
United European Gastroenterol J. 2014 Feb;2(1):30-7
pubmed: 24918006
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013 Feb;19(2):332-41
pubmed: 23328771
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:5832051
pubmed: 26839541
J Crohns Colitis. 2017 Apr 1;11(4):435-444
pubmed: 27664275
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009 Dec;15(12):1851-8
pubmed: 19462421
Gut. 2014 Jan;63(1):88-95
pubmed: 23974954
Gut. 2019 Apr;68(4):594-603
pubmed: 29437913
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017 Dec;23(12):2238-2244
pubmed: 28991857
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;10(10):749-759
pubmed: 29051786
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jan 7;138(1):40-4
pubmed: 12513043
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016 May;22(5):1042-8
pubmed: 26919460
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Nov;107(11):1684-92
pubmed: 23147523
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;111(12):1692-1701
pubmed: 27725645
J Crohns Colitis. 2014 Dec;8(12):1582-97
pubmed: 25267173
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):55-63
pubmed: 25560714
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Jun;6(5):765-772
pubmed: 30083339
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 8;353(23):2462-76
pubmed: 16339095
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016 Mar;22(3):623-30
pubmed: 26829408
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571

Auteurs

Toer W Stevens (TW)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Krisztina Gecse (K)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Jerrold R Turner (JR)

Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Gert de Hertogh (G)

Department of Pathology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

David T Rubin (DT)

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Geert R D'Haens (GR)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: g.dhaens@amc.uva.nl.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH