Reliability of Residual Tumor Estimation Based on Navigation Log.
glioma
intraoperative MRI
log
navigation
residual tumor
Journal
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
ISSN: 1349-8029
Titre abrégé: Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 0400775
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Sep 2020
15 Sep 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
18
8
2020
medline:
17
8
2021
entrez:
18
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The mass of residual tumors has previously been estimated using time-series records of the position of surgical instruments acquired from neurosurgical navigation systems (navigation log). This method has been shown to be useful for rapid evaluation of residual tumors during resection. However, quantitative analysis of the method's reliability has not been sufficiently reported. The effect of poor log coverage is dominant in previous studies, in that it did not highlight other disturbance factors, such as intraoperative brain shift. We analyzed 25 patients with a high log-acquisition rate that was calculated by dividing the log-available time by the instrument-use time. We estimated the region of resection using the trajectory of surgical instrument that was extracted from the navigation log. We then calculated the residual tumor region and measured its volume as log-estimation residual tumor volume (RTV). We evaluated the correlation between the log-estimation RTV and the RTV in the post-resection magnetic resonance (MR) image. We also evaluated the accuracy of detecting the residual tumor mass using the estimated residual tumor region. The log-estimation RTV and the RTV in the post-resection MR image were significantly correlated (correlation coefficient = 0.960; P <0.001). The presence of patient-wise residual tumor mass was detected with a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 92.9%. The individual residual tumor mass was detected with a positive predictive value of 72%. Estimation of residual tumor with adequate log coverage appears to be a suitable method with a high reliability. This method can support rapid decision-making during resection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32801273
doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2020-0042
pmc: PMC7490597
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
458-467Références
Acad Radiol. 2005 Jan;12(1):116-22
pubmed: 15691732
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;129(1):1-9
pubmed: 28885120
J Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;124(4):977-88
pubmed: 26495941
World Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;98:73-80
pubmed: 27989974
Neurosurgery. 2000 Nov;47(5):1070-9; discussion 1079-80
pubmed: 11063099
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Oct;12(11):997-1003
pubmed: 21868284
Surg Neurol. 2001 Dec;56(6):357-64; discussion 364-5
pubmed: 11755962
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Jan;38(1):E7
pubmed: 25599276
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008 Oct;51(5):285-91
pubmed: 18855294
Surg Neurol Int. 2014 May 15;5:70
pubmed: 24991473
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012 Sep;9(5):491-500
pubmed: 23116076
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2018 Jul;35(3):159-167
pubmed: 29980868
Int J Med Robot. 2006 Jun;2(2):139-45
pubmed: 17520624
J Neurosurg. 2001 Aug;95(2):190-8
pubmed: 11780887
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1338-45
pubmed: 18323558
Neurosurgery. 2008 Apr;62(4):753-64; discussion 264-6
pubmed: 18496181
Neurol Res. 2003 Jan;25(1):9-12
pubmed: 12564118
Neurosurgery. 2009 Mar;64(3 Suppl):ons170-5; discussion ons176
pubmed: 19240566
Med Image Anal. 2017 Jan;35:403-420
pubmed: 27585837
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014 Sep;9(5):825-36
pubmed: 24420696
Int J Med Robot. 2009 Dec;5(4):423-34
pubmed: 19621334
J Robot Surg. 2007;1(1):91-7
pubmed: 25484943
J Neurooncol. 2020 Jan;146(2):321-327
pubmed: 31865510
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011;109:67-72
pubmed: 20960323
Neurosurgery. 2001 Apr;48(4):787-97; discussion 797-8
pubmed: 11322439