Targeting Prostate Cancer Using Intratumoral Cytotopically Modified Interleukin-15 Immunotherapy in a Syngeneic Murine Model.
IL-15
NK cells
checkpoint blockade
cytotopic modification
prostate cancer
Journal
ImmunoTargets and therapy
ISSN: 2253-1556
Titre abrégé: Immunotargets Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101606565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
15
04
2020
accepted:
26
05
2020
entrez:
18
8
2020
pubmed:
18
8
2020
medline:
18
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The prostate cancer microenvironment is highly immunosuppressive; immune cells stimulated in the periphery by systemic immunotherapies will be rendered inactive once entering this environment. Immunotherapies for prostate cancer need to break this immune tolerance. We have previously identified interleukin-15 (IL-15) as the only cytokine tested that activates and expands immune cells in the presence of prostate cancer cells. In the current study, we aimed to identify a method of boosting the efficacy of IL-15 in prostate cancer. We engineered, by conjugation to a myristoylated peptide, a membrane-localising form of IL-15 (cyto-IL-15) and the checkpoint inhibitor antibodies cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) (cyto-abs) to enable them to bind to cell surfaces by non-specific anchoring to the phospholipid bilayer. The efficacy of these agents was investigated by intratumoral administration either alone (cyto-IL-15 or cyto-abs) or in combination (cyto-combo) in subcutaneous TRAMP-C2 prostate tumors in C57BL/6J mice and compared with their non-modified equivalents in vivo. Following the survival endpoint, histological analyses and RNA sequencing were performed on the tumors. Intratumoral injection of cyto-IL-15 or cyto-combo delayed tumor growth by 50% and increased median survival to 28 and 25 days, respectively, compared with vehicle (17 days), whereas non-modified IL-15 or antibodies alone had no significant effects on tumor growth or survival. Histological analysis showed that cyto-IL-15 and cyto-combo increased necrosis and infiltration of natural killer (NK) cells and CD8 T cells in the tumors compared with vehicle and non-modified agents. Overall, the efficacy of cyto-combo was not superior to that of cyto-IL-15 alone. We have demonstrated that intratumoral injection of cyto-IL-15 leads to prostate cancer growth delay, induces tumor necrosis and increases survival. Hence, cytotopic modification in combination with intratumoral injection appears to be a promising novel approach for prostate cancer immunotherapy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The prostate cancer microenvironment is highly immunosuppressive; immune cells stimulated in the periphery by systemic immunotherapies will be rendered inactive once entering this environment. Immunotherapies for prostate cancer need to break this immune tolerance. We have previously identified interleukin-15 (IL-15) as the only cytokine tested that activates and expands immune cells in the presence of prostate cancer cells. In the current study, we aimed to identify a method of boosting the efficacy of IL-15 in prostate cancer.
METHODS
METHODS
We engineered, by conjugation to a myristoylated peptide, a membrane-localising form of IL-15 (cyto-IL-15) and the checkpoint inhibitor antibodies cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) (cyto-abs) to enable them to bind to cell surfaces by non-specific anchoring to the phospholipid bilayer. The efficacy of these agents was investigated by intratumoral administration either alone (cyto-IL-15 or cyto-abs) or in combination (cyto-combo) in subcutaneous TRAMP-C2 prostate tumors in C57BL/6J mice and compared with their non-modified equivalents in vivo. Following the survival endpoint, histological analyses and RNA sequencing were performed on the tumors.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Intratumoral injection of cyto-IL-15 or cyto-combo delayed tumor growth by 50% and increased median survival to 28 and 25 days, respectively, compared with vehicle (17 days), whereas non-modified IL-15 or antibodies alone had no significant effects on tumor growth or survival. Histological analysis showed that cyto-IL-15 and cyto-combo increased necrosis and infiltration of natural killer (NK) cells and CD8 T cells in the tumors compared with vehicle and non-modified agents. Overall, the efficacy of cyto-combo was not superior to that of cyto-IL-15 alone.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We have demonstrated that intratumoral injection of cyto-IL-15 leads to prostate cancer growth delay, induces tumor necrosis and increases survival. Hence, cytotopic modification in combination with intratumoral injection appears to be a promising novel approach for prostate cancer immunotherapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32802803
doi: 10.2147/ITT.S257443
pii: 257443
pmc: PMC7394845
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
115-130Informations de copyright
© 2020 Papaevangelou et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Efthymia Papaevangelou, Dorota Smolarek, Richard A Smith, Prokar Dasgupta, and Christine Galustian report a patent, GB 1,913,804.9, pending to King's College London and the Prostate Cancer Research Centre Charity. The authors report no other possible conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Cancer Res. 2004 Nov 1;64(21):8062-7
pubmed: 15520217
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Jun 15;6(1):56
pubmed: 29907163
Cell. 2015 Apr 9;161(2):205-14
pubmed: 25860605
Cancer Med. 2013 Oct;2(5):662-73
pubmed: 24403232
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Apr 1;24(7):1525-1535
pubmed: 29203590
Int J Cancer. 2018 Aug 15;143(4):992-1002
pubmed: 29569717
Nat Immunol. 2005 Nov;6(11):1142-51
pubmed: 16227984
Annu Rev Immunol. 1999;17:19-49
pubmed: 10358752
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 17;109(16):6187-92
pubmed: 22474386
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Mar 15;13(6):1810-5
pubmed: 17363537
Blood. 2011 May 5;117(18):4787-95
pubmed: 21385847
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):74-82
pubmed: 25403209
J Clin Invest. 1997 Mar 1;99(5):937-43
pubmed: 9062351
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20
pubmed: 26028255
Cell. 2018 Jun 14;173(7):1770-1782.e14
pubmed: 29906450
Front Immunol. 2014 May 06;5:191
pubmed: 24834066
Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 Jan;4(1):49-60
pubmed: 26511282
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:486798
pubmed: 24738060
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30
pubmed: 29313949
Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 29;7(13):16130-45
pubmed: 26910920
J Cell Physiol. 2019 Jun;234(6):8509-8521
pubmed: 30520029
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:794968
pubmed: 26161414
Immunity. 2001 Feb;14(2):105-10
pubmed: 11239443
Ann Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;29(8):1807-1813
pubmed: 29992241
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2002 Apr;13(2):169-83
pubmed: 11900992
Histopathology. 2012 Jan;60(1):199-215
pubmed: 22212087
EMBO J. 1995 Aug 1;14(15):3654-63
pubmed: 7641685
Front Immunol. 2019 Mar 28;10:603
pubmed: 30984182
Immunol Res. 2013 Mar;55(1-3):22-33
pubmed: 22941561
Semin Oncol. 2015 Jun;42(3):495-505
pubmed: 25965369
BJU Int. 2020 Jan;125(1):89-102
pubmed: 31392791
Cancer Treat Rev. 2010 Apr;36(2):131-41
pubmed: 19954892
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Apr 1;20(7):1747-56
pubmed: 24691639
Urol Clin North Am. 2012 Nov;39(4):561-71
pubmed: 23084531
Trials. 2017 Jun 6;18(1):255
pubmed: 28587616
Immunology. 2009 Sep;128(1):7-15
pubmed: 19689731
J Immunol. 2012 Jun 15;188(12):6156-64
pubmed: 22593619
Genomics. 1995 Feb 10;25(3):701-6
pubmed: 7759105
Blood. 2009 Sep 17;114(12):2417-26
pubmed: 19605850
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2012 Jan;33(1):35-41
pubmed: 22032984
Cancer Res. 2008 Mar 1;68(5):1254-60
pubmed: 18296647
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 10;97(21):11445-50
pubmed: 11016962
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 5;12(4):e0172786
pubmed: 28379958
BMC Med Genomics. 2014 Aug 09;7:49
pubmed: 25108500
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 May 09;20(9):
pubmed: 31075975
Blood. 2018 Jun 7;131(23):2515-2527
pubmed: 29463563
Histol Histopathol. 2013 Dec;28(12):1621-8
pubmed: 23729368
J Leukoc Biol. 1997 Jun;61(6):729-35
pubmed: 9201264
Adv Ther. 2019 Oct;36(10):2638-2678
pubmed: 31410780
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Apr;17(4):1102-11
pubmed: 16510763
Br J Cancer. 2004 Aug 2;91(3):541-3
pubmed: 15266325
Cell Immunol. 1995 Oct 15;165(2):289-93
pubmed: 7553894
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
Am J Transplant. 2017 Jan;17(1):272-280
pubmed: 27376583
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 1;17(11):3520-6
pubmed: 21471425
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2016 Jan;8(1):4-31
pubmed: 26753003
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Nov 05;18(11):
pubmed: 29113093