Linear versus Circular Stapler for Gastrojejunal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: An Analysis of 211 Cases.
Journal
Surgery research and practice
ISSN: 2356-7759
Titre abrégé: Surg Res Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101628730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
03
02
2020
revised:
12
05
2020
accepted:
18
07
2020
entrez:
18
8
2020
pubmed:
18
8
2020
medline:
18
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a frequently performed bariatric procedure, there is still no consensus on its technical implementation. 211 patients treated with LRYGB in a single institution between March 2011 and October 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. A subgroup analysis for the linear (LSA) versus circular stapler technique (CSA) for gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) was performed to evaluate complications and outcomes. 128 (60.6%) patients received GJA with CSA and 83 (39.4%) with LSA. Average weight loss one year after surgery, respectively, BMI after one year of follow-up (kg/m Both the circular and the linear stapler techniques for gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are safe methods with comparable outcomes. A disadvantage of CSA is the significantly higher rate of wound infections, a circumstance which requires increased attention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32802938
doi: 10.1155/2020/4090797
pmc: PMC7414346
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
4090797Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Laurin Burla et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Nov-Dec;11(6):1233-6
pubmed: 25979205
N Engl J Med. 2017 May 18;376(20):1997
pubmed: 28514616
Obes Surg. 2002 Oct;12(5):639-42
pubmed: 12448384
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Dec;402(8):1255-1262
pubmed: 29046948
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Apr 19;14(4):
pubmed: 28422077
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jan;12(1):4-9
pubmed: 26048519
Obes Surg. 2010 Apr;20(4):440-6
pubmed: 19856035
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 Mar-Apr;4(2):166-72; discussion 172-3
pubmed: 18069071
Obes Surg. 2003 Jun;13(3):364-70
pubmed: 12841895
Int J Surg. 2016 Aug;32:150-7
pubmed: 27107663
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):4098-4101
pubmed: 30805785
Obes Surg. 2016 Aug;26(8):1659-96
pubmed: 27412673
Obes Surg. 2011 Dec;21(12):1958-64
pubmed: 21909866
Obes Surg. 2018 Dec;28(12):3783-3794
pubmed: 30121858
Obes Facts. 2017;10(1):25-37
pubmed: 28190010
JAMA. 2014 Jun 11;311(22):2297-304
pubmed: 24915261
Obes Surg. 2015 Jan;25(1):19-26
pubmed: 25092167
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011 May-Jun;7(3):284-9
pubmed: 21126927
Obes Surg. 1994 Nov;4(4):353-357
pubmed: 10742801
Obes Surg. 2014 Feb;24(2):299-309
pubmed: 24234733