Individual variability of olfactory fMRI in normosmia and olfactory dysfunction.
Individual variability
Objective diagnosis
Olfactory dysfunction
fMRI
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
29
05
2020
accepted:
18
07
2020
pubmed:
18
8
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
entrez:
18
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The diagnosis of olfactory dysfunction is mainly based on psychophysical measurements. The aim of the current study was to investigate how well the olfactory functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can effectively distinguish between normosmic people and subjects with olfactory dysfunction. Thirty-eight participants were recruited for the study. Group 1 consisted of 22 subjects with olfactory dysfunction (mean age = 44.3 years, SD = 18.6), and Group two consisted of 16 participants with normal olfactory function (mean age = 49.6 years, SD = 11.6). Olfactory functions were assessed in great detail for all participants, and brain activation in response to odorous stimulation was assessed using fMRI. The between-group comparison showed stronger odor induced brain activation of the primary olfactory area and the insular cortex among the normosmic group as compared to the dysosmic group. As indicated by the individual analysis, positive responses in the primary olfactory cortex were significantly higher in normosmic people (94%) than in subjects with olfactory dysfunction (41%). However, there was no association between individual fMRI parameters (including the percentage of BOLD signal change, activated cluster size and peak z value), and psychophysical olfactory test scores. Receiver operating characteristic analysis suggested the subjects could not be differentiated from normosmics based on their BOLD signal from the primary olfactory area, orbitofrontal cortex, or the insular cortex. There are large inter-individual variabilities for odor-induced brain activation among normosmic subjects and subjects with olfactory dysfunction, due to this variation, at present it appears problematic to diagnose olfactory dysfunction on an individual level using fMRI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32803385
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06233-y
pii: 10.1007/s00405-020-06233-y
pmc: PMC7826297
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
379-387Références
Neuroimage. 2013 Feb 1;66:333-42
pubmed: 23103688
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;257(4):205-11
pubmed: 10867835
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Mar;264(3):237-43
pubmed: 17021776
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 14;7:42534
pubmed: 28195241
Neuroimage. 2019 Jul 15;195:174-189
pubmed: 30930312
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Oct 26;1(1):28-33
pubmed: 29204537
Chem Senses. 1997 Feb;22(1):39-52
pubmed: 9056084
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Feb;146(2):240-6
pubmed: 21998084
Nat Neurosci. 2009 May;12(5):535-40
pubmed: 19396166
Molecules. 2013 Sep 17;18(9):11586-600
pubmed: 24048289
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1170:730-5
pubmed: 19686220
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jul;12(7):932-8
pubmed: 19483688
Chem Senses. 2018 Jul 5;43(6):389-398
pubmed: 29726890
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 May;35(5):2055-72
pubmed: 23818133
ACS Chem Neurosci. 2011 Jan;2(1):5-16
pubmed: 21503268
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Jun;20(6):425-443
pubmed: 27138646
Rhinology. 2016 Jan 31;56(1):1-30
pubmed: 28623665
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2019 Jan 30;283:67-76
pubmed: 30554128
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 10;11(2):e0148937
pubmed: 26863023
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jan;37(1):92-100
pubmed: 22987333
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 4;109(49):19959-64
pubmed: 23169632
Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):1233-9
pubmed: 12880848
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 8;13(11):e0206583
pubmed: 30408072
Rhinology. 2016 Dec 1;54(4):374-381
pubmed: 27421303
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998 Jan-Feb;22(1):96-103
pubmed: 9448771
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2005 Dec 15;50(2):287-304
pubmed: 16213593
Laryngoscope. 2020 May;130(5):1110-1115
pubmed: 31265137
J Neurol. 2018 Oct;265(10):2322-2332
pubmed: 30109478
Neuron. 2017 Aug 16;95(4):791-807.e7
pubmed: 28757305
Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):415-22
pubmed: 22776461