Use of Imaging to Optimise Prostate Cancer Tumour Volume Assessment for Focal Therapy Planning.
Focal therapy
Magnetic resonance imaging
Multi-parametric MRI
Prostate cancer
Journal
Current urology reports
ISSN: 1534-6285
Titre abrégé: Curr Urol Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100900943
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Aug 2020
17 Aug 2020
Historique:
entrez:
18
8
2020
pubmed:
18
8
2020
medline:
22
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rapid advances in imaging of the prostate have facilitated the development of focal therapy and provided a non-invasive method of estimating tumour volume. Focal therapy relies on an accurate estimate of tumour volume for patient selection and treatment planning so that the optimal energy dose can be delivered to the target area(s) of the prostate while minimising toxicity to surrounding structures. This review provides an overview of different imaging modalities which may be used to optimise tumour volume assessment and critically evaluates the published evidence for each modality. Multi-parametric MRI (mp-MRI) has become the standard tool for patient selection and guiding focal therapy treatment. The current evidence suggests that mp-MRI may underestimate tumour volume, although there is a large variability in results. There remain significant methodological challenges associated with pathological processing and accurate co-registration of histopathological data with mp-MRI. Advances in different ultrasound modalities are showing promise but there has been limited research into tumour volume estimation. The role of PSMA PET/CT is still evolving and further investigation is needed to establish if this is a viable technique for prostate tumour volumetric assessment. mp-MRI provides the necessary tumour volume information required for selecting patients and guiding focal therapy treatment. The potential for underestimation of tumour volume should be taken into account and an additional margin applied to ensure adequate treatment coverage. At present, there are no other viable image-based alternatives although advances in new technologies may refine volume estimations in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32803471
doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-00987-y
pii: 10.1007/s11934-020-00987-y
pmc: PMC7429546
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
38Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 204998/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
J Urol. 2011 Aug;186(2):458-64
pubmed: 21679984
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jun;37(6):1392-401
pubmed: 23172614
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):132-142
pubmed: 28700844
BJU Int. 2014 Dec;114(6b):E32-E42
pubmed: 24447606
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):771-7
pubmed: 25281389
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017 May;98(5):423-428
pubmed: 28330587
Urology. 1995 Jun;45(6):987-92
pubmed: 7771031
J Urol. 1995 May;153(5):1543-8
pubmed: 7714976
Am J Clin Pathol. 1997 Jun;107(6):704-8
pubmed: 9169669
J Urol. 1988 Jun;139(6):1235-41
pubmed: 3373594
J Urol. 2011 Jan;185(1):121-5
pubmed: 21074212
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):648-655
pubmed: 27349615
Urology. 2004 Jul;64(1):101-5
pubmed: 15245944
Radiology. 1989 Mar;170(3 Pt 1):609-15
pubmed: 2644656
MAGMA. 1997 Jun;5(2):117-21
pubmed: 9268075
BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(4):508-16
pubmed: 23746198
Transl Oncol. 2016 Feb;9(1):41-45
pubmed: 26947880
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):932-42
pubmed: 24597866
World J Urol. 2015 Nov;33(11):1651-9
pubmed: 25761736
Radiology. 2009 Aug;252(2):449-57
pubmed: 19703883
BJU Int. 2007 Mar;99(3):554-8
pubmed: 17407514
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822
pubmed: 28110982
BJU Int. 2016 Jul;118(1):35-43
pubmed: 26384851
J Urol. 2016 Aug;196(2):562-9
pubmed: 26791931
J Urol. 1990 Jun;143(6):1155-62
pubmed: 1692886
Urol Oncol. 2008 Sep-Oct;26(5):506-10
pubmed: 18774464
J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):364-70
pubmed: 25711199
Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):1045-53
pubmed: 25656808
Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 May;66:23-44
pubmed: 29673922
J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2136-41
pubmed: 12771735
Med Image Anal. 2012 Apr;16(3):687-703
pubmed: 21216180
BJU Int. 2014 Dec;114(6b):E105-E112
pubmed: 24673731
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Jun;40(6):824-31
pubmed: 23389430
Urology. 2000 Aug 1;56(2):273-7
pubmed: 10925093
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Nov;13(11):e509-17
pubmed: 23117005
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):846-853
pubmed: 26810346
J Urol. 2018 Dec;200(6):1235-1240
pubmed: 29940251
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424
pubmed: 27626136
J Urol. 2017 Feb;197(2):320-326
pubmed: 27484386
J Urol. 2014 May;191(5):1272-9
pubmed: 24333516
Radiology. 2015 Apr;275(1):144-54
pubmed: 25423145
Scand J Urol. 2014 Dec;48(6):499-505
pubmed: 24754780
J Urol. 1989 Oct;142(4):1008-10
pubmed: 2677409
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):787-94
pubmed: 25240973
Eur Radiol. 2009 Feb;19(2):470-80
pubmed: 18758786
Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):422-429
pubmed: 29960750
Radiology. 2008 Dec;249(3):900-8
pubmed: 19011187
Acta Oncol. 2014 Jan;53(1):88-95
pubmed: 24041257
BJU Int. 2017 Jul;120(1):92-103
pubmed: 27608292
J Urol. 1991 Jul;146(1):85-9
pubmed: 1711590
J Nucl Med. 2015 Jul;56(7):1003-1010
pubmed: 26069305
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777
pubmed: 29552975
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jun;192(6):1471-80
pubmed: 19457807
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Feb;110(2):303-8
pubmed: 24444524
J Urol. 2012 Oct;188(4):1157-1163
pubmed: 22901591
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Mar;66:86-92
pubmed: 29108869
Cancer. 1993 Feb 1;71(3 Suppl):933-8
pubmed: 7679045
Am J Surg Pathol. 1996 Dec;20(12):1501-6
pubmed: 8944043
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 Sep;19(3):258-63
pubmed: 27401032
J Urol. 2015 Oct;194(4):957-65
pubmed: 25912496
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Aug 1;83(5):1486-92
pubmed: 22284686
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 May;43(5):889-897
pubmed: 26592938
Eur Radiol. 2013 Jul;23(7):2019-29
pubmed: 23494494
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40
pubmed: 26427566