Utility of stone volume estimated by software algorithm in predicting success of medical expulsive therapy.


Journal

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
ISSN: 1911-6470
Titre abrégé: Can Urol Assoc J
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101312644

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 19 8 2020
medline: 19 8 2020
entrez: 19 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We sought to assess the accuracy of using stone volume (SV) estimated with a software algorithm as a predictor for stone passage in a trial of medical expulsive therapy (MET). We identified patients with ureteral stones discharged from the emergency department on MET. Patients with infection, non-ureteral stones, or needing immediate surgical intervention were excluded. For each stone, longest dimension (LD) was recorded, and SV was estimated by a computed tomography (CT)-based region-growing (RG) algorithm and standard ellipsoid formula (EF). Stone passage within 30 days was assessed via electronic chart and followup phone call. Fifty-one patients were included for analysis (53±16.7 years, 24% female). The mean LD was 4.85±2.02 mm. The mean SV was similar by EF and RG (0.051±0.057cm The clinical utility of SV estimated by software algorithm as a predictor for success of MET has not previously been examined. We demonstrated that spontaneously passed stones had a significantly smaller volume than those requiring intervention. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and establish volume thresholds for probability of stone passage.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32807279
pii: cuaj.6491
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6491
pmc: PMC7943234
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

E144-E147

Références

Eur Urol. 2018 Mar;73(3):385-391
pubmed: 29137830
Jpn J Radiol. 2013 Jun;31(6):393-400
pubmed: 23645389
Urology. 2012 Jul;80(1):27-31
pubmed: 22578829
J Endourol. 2018 Jun;32(6):572-576
pubmed: 29641351
J Endourol. 2016 Jan;30(1):32-6
pubmed: 26207417
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;67(1):86-95.e2
pubmed: 26194935
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug;191(2):396-401
pubmed: 18647908
J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):575-9
pubmed: 16406999
Cureus. 2017 Nov 15;9(11):e1848
pubmed: 29348991
BJU Int. 2009 Feb;103(4):524-8
pubmed: 19007365
Lancet. 2015 Jul 25;386(9991):341-9
pubmed: 25998582
BMJ. 2016 Dec 1;355:i6112
pubmed: 27908918
J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1161-9
pubmed: 27238615
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):468-74
pubmed: 26318710

Auteurs

Rajat Jain (R)

University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, United States.

Sara Maskal (S)

Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States.

Jason Milk (J)

Cleveland Clinic Department of Emergency Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States.

Leonard Kahn (L)

Cleveland Clinic Glickman Department of Radiology, Cleveland, OH, United States.

Donald Fedrigon (D)

Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States.

Sri Sivalingam (S)

Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH, United States.

Classifications MeSH