Technological Capabilities to Assess Digital Excellence in Hospitals in High Performing Health Care Systems: International eDelphi Exercise.


Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 08 2020
Historique:
received: 20 11 2019
accepted: 14 05 2020
revised: 11 05 2020
entrez: 19 8 2020
pubmed: 19 8 2020
medline: 8 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Hospitals worldwide are developing ambitious digital transformation programs as part of broader efforts to create digitally advanced health care systems. However, there is as yet no consensus on how best to characterize and assess digital excellence in hospitals. Our aim was to develop an international agreement on a defined set of technological capabilities to assess digital excellence in hospitals. We conducted a two-stage international modified electronic Delphi (eDelphi) consensus-building exercise, which included a qualitative analysis of free-text responses. In total, 31 international health informatics experts participated, representing clinical, academic, public, and vendor organizations. We identified 35 technological capabilities that indicate digital excellence in hospitals. These are divided into two categories: (a) capabilities within a hospital (n=20) and (b) capabilities enabling communication with other parts of the health and social care system, and with patients and carers (n=15). The analysis of free-text responses pointed to the importance of nontechnological aspects of digitally enabled change, including social and organizational factors. Examples included an institutional culture characterized by a willingness to transform established ways of working and openness to risk-taking. The availability of a range of skills within digitization teams, including technological, project management and business expertise, and availability of resources to support hospital staff, were also highlighted. We have identified a set of criteria for assessing digital excellence in hospitals. Our findings highlight the need to broaden the focus from technical functionalities to wider digital transformation capabilities.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Hospitals worldwide are developing ambitious digital transformation programs as part of broader efforts to create digitally advanced health care systems. However, there is as yet no consensus on how best to characterize and assess digital excellence in hospitals.
OBJECTIVE
Our aim was to develop an international agreement on a defined set of technological capabilities to assess digital excellence in hospitals.
METHODS
We conducted a two-stage international modified electronic Delphi (eDelphi) consensus-building exercise, which included a qualitative analysis of free-text responses. In total, 31 international health informatics experts participated, representing clinical, academic, public, and vendor organizations.
RESULTS
We identified 35 technological capabilities that indicate digital excellence in hospitals. These are divided into two categories: (a) capabilities within a hospital (n=20) and (b) capabilities enabling communication with other parts of the health and social care system, and with patients and carers (n=15). The analysis of free-text responses pointed to the importance of nontechnological aspects of digitally enabled change, including social and organizational factors. Examples included an institutional culture characterized by a willingness to transform established ways of working and openness to risk-taking. The availability of a range of skills within digitization teams, including technological, project management and business expertise, and availability of resources to support hospital staff, were also highlighted.
CONCLUSIONS
We have identified a set of criteria for assessing digital excellence in hospitals. Our findings highlight the need to broaden the focus from technical functionalities to wider digital transformation capabilities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32808938
pii: v22i8e17022
doi: 10.2196/17022
pmc: PMC7463397
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e17022

Informations de copyright

©Marta Krasuska, Robin Williams, Aziz Sheikh, Bryony Dean Franklin, Catherine Heeney, Wendy Lane, Hajar Mozaffar, Kathy Mason, Sally Eason, Susan Hinder, Rachel Dunscombe, Henry W W Potts, Kathrin Cresswell. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 18.08.2020.

Références

J Adv Nurs. 2003 Feb;41(4):376-82
pubmed: 12581103
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):760-6
pubmed: 21697293
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1142-1148
pubmed: 29016973
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Feb;78(2):127-40
pubmed: 18752988
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38
pubmed: 15755945
J Med Syst. 2016 Jun;40(6):131
pubmed: 27083575
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):1008-15
pubmed: 11095242
PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 18;8(1):e1000387
pubmed: 21267058
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19 Suppl 3:i68-74
pubmed: 20959322
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 07;20(8):e10458
pubmed: 30087090
N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4;362(5):382-5
pubmed: 20042745
Int J Med Inform. 2001 Oct;63(3):179-204
pubmed: 11502432
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 14;18(4):e75
pubmed: 27080852
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476
pubmed: 21694759
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Jan;53(2):205-12
pubmed: 16422719
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Jan;19(1):180-6
pubmed: 8138622
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):10
pubmed: 29588644
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Dec 01;5:37
pubmed: 16321161
J Med Syst. 2018 Oct 16;42(12):235
pubmed: 30327955
Methods Inf Med. 2009;48(6):508-18
pubmed: 19893854
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 May 16;2:41
pubmed: 31304387
J Adv Nurs. 1994 May;19(5):870-7
pubmed: 8056915
J Adv Nurs. 1987 Nov;12(6):729-34
pubmed: 3320139

Auteurs

Marta Krasuska (M)

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Robin Williams (R)

Institute for the Study of Science, Technology and Innovation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Aziz Sheikh (A)

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Bryony Dean Franklin (BD)

UCL School of Pharmacy, London, United Kingdom.
National Institute for Health Research Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.

Catherine Heeney (C)

Institute for the Study of Science, Technology and Innovation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Wendy Lane (W)

National Health Services Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit, Warwick, United Kingdom.

Hajar Mozaffar (H)

Business School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Kathy Mason (K)

National Health Services Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit, Warwick, United Kingdom.

Sally Eason (S)

National Health Services Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit, Warwick, United Kingdom.

Susan Hinder (S)

Institute for the Study of Science, Technology and Innovation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Rachel Dunscombe (R)

Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
KLAS Research's Arch Collaborative, London, United Kingdom.

Henry W W Potts (HWW)

Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Kathrin Cresswell (K)

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH