Effect of Ascorbic Acid, Corticosteroids, and Thiamine on Organ Injury in Septic Shock: The ACTS Randomized Clinical Trial.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
/ adverse effects
Adult
Aged
Ascorbic Acid
/ adverse effects
Cross Infection
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Humans
Hyperglycemia
/ chemically induced
Hypernatremia
/ chemically induced
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple Organ Failure
/ etiology
Organ Dysfunction Scores
Proportional Hazards Models
Shock, Septic
/ complications
Thiamine
/ adverse effects
Treatment Failure
Journal
JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Aug 2020
18 Aug 2020
Historique:
entrez:
19
8
2020
pubmed:
19
8
2020
medline:
2
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The combination of ascorbic acid, corticosteroids, and thiamine has been identified as a potential therapy for septic shock. To determine whether the combination of ascorbic acid, corticosteroids, and thiamine attenuates organ injury in patients with septic shock. Randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical trial of ascorbic acid, corticosteroids, and thiamine vs placebo for adult patients with septic shock. Two hundred five patients were enrolled between February 9, 2018, and October 27, 2019, at 14 centers in the United States. Follow-up continued until November 26, 2019. Patients were randomly assigned to receive parenteral ascorbic acid (1500 mg), hydrocortisone (50 mg), and thiamine (100 mg) every 6 hours for 4 days (n = 103) or placebo in matching volumes at the same time points (n = 102). The primary outcome was change in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (range, 0-24; 0 = best) between enrollment and 72 hours. Key secondary outcomes included kidney failure and 30-day mortality. Patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug were included in analyses. Among 205 randomized patients (mean age, 68 [SD, 15] years; 90 [44%] women), 200 (98%) received at least 1 dose of study drug, completed the trial, and were included in the analyses (101 with intervention and 99 with placebo group). Overall, there was no statistically significant interaction between time and treatment group with regard to SOFA score over the 72 hours after enrollment (mean SOFA score change from 9.1 to 4.4 [-4.7] points with intervention vs 9.2 to 5.1 [-4.1] points with placebo; adjusted mean difference, -0.8; 95% CI, -1.7 to 0.2; P = .12 for interaction). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of kidney failure (31.7% with intervention vs 27.3% with placebo; adjusted risk difference, 0.03; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.2; P = .58) or in 30-day mortality (34.7% vs 29.3%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8-2.2; P = .26). The most common serious adverse events were hyperglycemia (12 patients with intervention and 7 patients with placebo), hypernatremia (11 and 7 patients, respectively), and new hospital-acquired infection (13 and 12 patients, respectively). In patients with septic shock, the combination of ascorbic acid, corticosteroids, and thiamine, compared with placebo, did not result in a statistically significant reduction in SOFA score during the first 72 hours after enrollment. These data do not support routine use of this combination therapy for patients with septic shock. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03389555.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32809003
pii: 2769467
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11946
pmc: PMC7435341
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
0
Ascorbic Acid
PQ6CK8PD0R
Thiamine
X66NSO3N35
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03389555']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
642-650Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : K23 GM128005
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 May;14(5):737-741
pubmed: 28207287
Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):360-7
pubmed: 26771781
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Feb;46(2):315-328
pubmed: 32040667
Crit Care. 2018 Oct 29;22(1):283
pubmed: 30373647
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 01;378(9):797-808
pubmed: 29347874
Crit Care. 2017 Feb 24;21(1):38
pubmed: 28231816
Chest. 2017 Jun;151(6):1229-1238
pubmed: 27940189
Chest. 2017 Nov;152(5):954-962
pubmed: 28739448
Crit Care. 2018 Jan 29;22(1):23
pubmed: 29378661
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jun;8(6):1062-6
pubmed: 27293820
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211
pubmed: 31954465
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 17;9(12):e034406
pubmed: 31852712
JAMA. 2019 Oct 1;322(13):1261-1270
pubmed: 31573637
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov 1;192(9):1045-51
pubmed: 26177009
Crit Care Resusc. 2019 Dec;21(4):236-42
pubmed: 31778629
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 27;23(1):374
pubmed: 31775846
JAMA. 2001 Dec 5;286(21):2703-10
pubmed: 11730446
JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):62-75
pubmed: 29297082
JAMA. 2020 Jan 17;:
pubmed: 31950979
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 01;378(9):809-818
pubmed: 29490185
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74
pubmed: 26903335
JAMA. 2001 Oct 10;286(14):1754-8
pubmed: 11594901
J Transl Med. 2014 Jan 31;12:32
pubmed: 24484547