COVID-19 pneumonia: Diagnostic and prognostic role of CT based on a retrospective analysis of 214 consecutive patients from Paris, France.
COVID
Diagnostic tests
Multidetector computed tomography
Prognosis
Routine
Journal
European journal of radiology
ISSN: 1872-7727
Titre abrégé: Eur J Radiol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8106411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
08
06
2020
revised:
16
07
2020
accepted:
03
08
2020
pubmed:
19
8
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
19
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of CT in patients referred for COVID19 suspicion to a French university hospital, depending on symptoms and date of onset. From March 1st to March 28th, 214 patients having both chest CT scan and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT- PCT) within 24 h were retrospectively evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of first and expert readings were calculated together with inter reader agreement, with results of RT-PCR as standard of reference and according to symptoms and onset date. Patient characteristics and disease extent on CT were correlated to short-term outcome (death or intubation at 3 weeks follow-up). Of the 214 patients (119 men, mean age 59 ± 19 years), 129 had at least one positive RT-PCR result. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were 79 % (95 % CI: 71-86 %), 84 %(74-91 %), 72 %(63-81 %) and 88 % (81-93 %) for initial CT reading and 81 %(74-88 %), 91 % (82-96 %), 76 % (67-84 %) and 93 % (87-97 %), for expert reading, with strong inter-reader agreement (kappa index: 0.89). Considering the 123 patients with symptoms for more than 5 days, the corresponding figures were 90 %, 78 %, 80 % and 89 % for initial reading and 93 %, 88 %, 86 % and 94 % for the expert. Disease extent exceeded 25 % for 68 % and 26 % of severe and non-severe patients, respectively (p < 0.001). CT sensitivity increased after 5 days of symptoms. A disease extent > 25 % was associated with poorer outcome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32810701
pii: S0720-048X(20)30398-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109209
pmc: PMC7414360
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
109209Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E79-E85
pubmed: 32243238
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E46-E54
pubmed: 32155105
Eur Radiol. 2020 Aug;30(8):4398-4406
pubmed: 32211963
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 May;101(5):263-268
pubmed: 32291197
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 19;15(3):e0230548
pubmed: 32191764
Eur Radiol. 2020 Aug;30(8):4407-4416
pubmed: 32215691
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Jun;127:109009
pubmed: 32325282
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jul;215(1):87-93
pubmed: 32174129
Eur Radiol. 2020 Sep;30(9):4865-4873
pubmed: 32291502
Radiology. 2020 Apr;295(1):202-207
pubmed: 32017661
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;20(4):425-434
pubmed: 32105637
Radiology. 2020 Jun;295(3):200463
pubmed: 32077789
Eur Radiol. 2020 Sep;30(9):4903-4909
pubmed: 32314058
Eur Radiol. 2020 Aug;30(8):4381-4389
pubmed: 32193638
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E86-E96
pubmed: 32301647
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 May;214(5):1072-1077
pubmed: 32125873
Invest Radiol. 2020 Jul;55(7):412-421
pubmed: 32304402
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E32-E40
pubmed: 32101510
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 1;180(7):934-943
pubmed: 32167524
Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):E145-E155
pubmed: 32301646
Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2388-2398
pubmed: 30643941
Radiology. 2020 Jun;295(3):715-721
pubmed: 32053470
Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1):106-116
pubmed: 32275978