How hospital-based health care providers perceive clinical librarian services: a qualitative review protocol.
Journal
JBI evidence synthesis
ISSN: 2689-8381
Titre abrégé: JBI Evid Synth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764819
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
20
8
2020
medline:
22
5
2021
entrez:
20
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of the review is to evaluate how health care providers working in hospitals perceive clinical librarian services. Clinical librarianship programs existed as early as 1971; however, there is a lack of evidence on their effectiveness in impacting health care outcomes. Studies report primarily on programs supporting medicine, although these programs also support other health care providers. In order to affect outcomes, particularly those focused on patient-centered, evidence-based care, clinical librarians need insight into how hospital health care providers perceive clinical librarian services. The review will consider studies that include any health care provider who works within a hospital, including surgical, clinical, and inpatient units. Studies that focus on qualitative data about clinical librarian services, published from 1971 onward, will be eligible for inclusion. The primary databases to be searched are PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Library Literature & Information Science, LISTA (Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts), and Web of Science. Studies will be selected based on their assessment against the inclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. Eligible studies will be critically appraised for methodological quality. Data will be extracted using a standardized tool, and findings pooled and synthesized using a meta-aggregation approach.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32813410
pii: 02174543-202103000-00015
doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00324
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
689-694Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 JBI.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Detlefsen EG, Gertrude H. Lamb, 1918-2015, AHIP, FMLA. J Med Libr Assoc 2015; 103 (3):121–122.
Arcari R, Lamb G. The librarian in clinical care. Hosp Med Staff 1977; 6 (12):18–23.
Cimpl K. Clinical medical librarianship: a review of the literature. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1985; 73 (1):21–28.
Hill P. Report of a national review of NHS funded library information services in England: from knowledge to health in the 21st century; 2008. p. 107.
Lipscomb CE. Clinical librarianship. Bull Med Libr Assoc 2000; 88 (4):393–395.
Royal M, Grizzle WE, Algermissen V, Mowry RW. The success of a clinical librarian program in an academic autopsy pathology service. Am J Clin Pathol 1993; 99 (5):576–581.
Sargeant SJE, Harrison J. Clinical librarianship in the UK: temporary trend or permanent profession? Part I: a review of the role of the clinical librarian. Health Info Libr J 2004; 21 (3):173–181.
Silva CM, Benchimol M, de Paula RP. Clinical librarianship: an experience in the libraries of the Fundaçço das Pioneiras Sociais. AMB Rev Assoc Med Bras 1986; 32 (7–8):144.
Wagner KC, Byrd GD. Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical medical librarian programs: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Libr Assoc 2004; 92 (1):14–33.
Winning MA, Beverley CA. Clinical librarianship: a systematic review of the literature. Health Info Libr J 2003; 20: (suppl 1): 10–21.
Tan MC, Maggio LA. Expert searcher, teacher, content manager, and patient advocate: an exploratory study of clinical librarian roles. J Med Libr Assoc 2013; 101 (1):63–72.
Hargwood P, Duffy C. Out of the Library and on to the floors: librarian participation in nursing rounds. J Hosp Librariansh 2016; 16 (3):209–214.
Brandes S. Experience and outcomes of medical librarian rounding. Med Ref Serv Q 2007; 26 (4):85–92.
Brettle A, Maden-Jenkins M, Anderson L, McNally R, Pratchett T, Tancock J, et al. Evaluating clinical librarian services: a systematic review. Health Info Libr J 2011; 28 (1):3–22.
Brettle A, Maden M, Payne C. The impact of clinical librarian services on patients and health care organisations. Health Info Libr J 2016; 33 (2):100–120.
Marshall JG, Neufeld VR. A randomized trial of librarian educational participation in clinical settings. J Med Educ 1981; 56 (5):409–416.
Lockwood C, Porritt K, Munn Z, Rittenmeyer L, Salmond S, Bjerrum M. Aromataris E, Munn Z, et al. Chapter 2: Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. JBI, JBI Reviewer's Manual [internet]. Adelaide:2017.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. the PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (7):e1000097.
Lockwood C, Munn Z, Porritt K. Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015; 13 (3):179–187.
Munn Z, Porritt K, Lockwood C, Aromataris E, Pearson A. Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14:108.