Effectiveness of multidisciplinary led self-management interventions on glycaemic control in people with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review protocol.
Journal
JBI evidence synthesis
ISSN: 2689-8381
Titre abrégé: JBI Evid Synth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764819
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
20
8
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
20
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of multidisciplinary self-management interventions for glycaemic control in people with type 1 diabetes. Type 1 diabetes is a chronic autoimmune disease. Self-management education led by a multidisciplinary team facilitates those with diabetes to acquire the necessary knowledge and skillset to improve their outcomes and quality of life. This review will consider studies on people aged 16 years and over with type 1 diabetes, investigating the effectiveness of multidisciplinary self-management interventions. The primary outcome of interest is glycemic control as measured by glycated hemoglobin levels. Secondary outcomes include quality of life as measured by validated screening tools and adverse outcomes, such as number of hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis events. This review will consider all quantitative study designs. Studies published in English since 2009 will be considered. MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL (via EBSCO), Embase (via embase.com), PsycINFO (via EBSCO) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Register of Studies (via Cochrane Library) will be searched. Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature to be searched include ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and Google Scholar. Titles and abstracts will be screened by two independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. Eligible studies will be critically appraised for methodological quality using standardized critical appraisal instruments from JBI. Data extraction and synthesis will follow methods outlined by JBI. PROSPERO CRD42020170205.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32813441
doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00283
pii: 02174543-202011000-00010
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2373-2379Références
Campbell F, Lawton J, Rankin D, Clowes M, Coates E, Heller S, et al. Follow-Up Support for Effective type 1 Diabetes self-management (The FUSED Model): a systematic review and meta-ethnography of the barriers, facilitators and recommendations for sustaining self-management skills after attending a structured education programme. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18 (1):898.
Vanstone M, Rewegan A, Brundisini F, Dejean D, Giacomini M. Patient perspectives on quality of life with uncontrolled type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2015; 15 (17):1.
Majumder E, Cogen FR, Monaghan M. Self-management strategies in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Health Car 2017; 31 (1):29–36.
Reddy M, Rilstone S, Cooper P, Oliver NS. Type 1 diabetes in adults: supporting self management. BMJ 2016; 352:i998.
Sanders T, Elliott J, Norman P, Johnson B, Heller S. Experiences of self-management among young adults with Type 1 diabetes in the context of a structured education programme: a qualitative study. Diabetic Med 2018; 35 (11):1531–1537.
Australian Government, Department of Health. Australian National Diabetes Strategy 2016-2020 [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 May 2]. Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/australian-national-diabetes-strategy-2016-2020.
So CF, Chung JW. Telehealth for diabetes self-management in primary healthcare: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2018; 24 (5):356–364.
Butts A, St. Johns Collins B, Dugan J. What's new in diabetes management: psychosocial care. Clinician Reviews 2018; 28 (5):10–12.
Griggs S, Morris NS. Fatigue among adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus and implications for self-management: an integrative review. Diabetes Educ 2018; 44 (4):325–339.
Beck J, Greenwood DA, Blanton L, Bollinger ST, Butcher MK, Condon JE, et al. 2017 National standards for diabetes self-management education and support. Diabetes Educ 2018; 44 (1):35–50.
McCarthy MM, Grey M. Type 1 diabetes self-management from emerging adulthood through older adulthood. Diabetes Care 2018; 41 (8):1608–1614.
Australian Diabetes Educators Association. Multidisciplinary diabetes care [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Aug 19]. Available from: https://members.adea.com.au/resources/for-health-professionals/the-diabetes-team/multidisciplinary-diabetes-care/.
Simmons D, Hartnell S, Watts J, Ward C, Davenport K, Gunn E, et al. Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary team approach to the prevention of readmission for acute glycaemic events. Diabetic Med 2015; 32 (10):1361–1367.
de Zoysa N, Rogers H, Stadler M, Gianfrancesco C, Beveridge S, Britneff E, et al. A psychoeducational program to restore hypoglycemia awareness: the DAFNE-HART pilot study. Diabetes Care 2014; 37 (3):863–866.
Dinneen SF, O’Hara MC, Byrne M, Smith D, Courtney CH, McGurk C, et al. Group follow-up compared to individual clinic visits after structured education for type 1 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2013; 100 (1):29–38.
Greenwood DA, Gee PM, Fatkin KJ, Peeples M. A systematic review of reviews evaluating technology-enabled diabetes self-management education and support. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2017; 11 (5):1015–1027.
De Jongh T, Gurol-Urganci I, Vodopivec-Jamsek V, Car J, Atun R. Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (12):CD007459.
Hou C, Xu Q, Diao S, Hewitt J, Li J, Carter B. Mobile phone applications and self-management of diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis, meta-regression of 21 randomized trials and GRADE. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018; 20 (8):2009–2013.
Siaw MYL, Lee JYC. Multidisciplinary collaborative care in the management of patients with uncontrolled diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract 2019; 73 (2):e13288.
Pillay J, Armstrong MJ, Butalia S, Donovan LE, Sigal RJ, Chordiya P, et al. Behavioral programs for type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163 (11):836–847.
Schmitt A, Reimer A, Kulzer B, Haak T, Ehrmann D, Hermanns N. How to assess diabetes distress: comparison of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). Diabetic Med 2016; 33 (6):835–843.
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L. Chapter 3: Systematic reviews of effectiveness. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Reviewer's Manual [Internet]. Adelaide: JBI; 2017 [cited 2019 April 10]. Available from: https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. the PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (7):e1000097.
Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editors. Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach. Updated October 2013. The GRADE Working Group [Internet]. 2013. [cited 2020 Feb 11]. Available from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html.