Clinical Restaging and Tumor Sequencing are Inaccurate Indicators of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.

Bladder cancer Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Postchemotherapy restaging Radical cystectomy Transurethral resection of bladder tumor Tumor mutation analysis

Journal

European urology
ISSN: 1873-7560
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 7512719

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2021
Historique:
received: 27 04 2020
accepted: 16 07 2020
pubmed: 21 8 2020
medline: 10 2 2022
entrez: 21 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) includes neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) followed by consolidative therapy with either chemoradiation or radical cystectomy (RC). Some patients experience robust pathologic responses to NAC, and these have been reported to associate with somatic mutations in specific gene pathways including DNA damage response genes. To evaluate the ability of post-NAC clinical restaging, with or without tumor sequencing, to predict final RC pathologic staging. We reviewed our institutional review board-approved institutional database to identify patients with MIBC who underwent NAC followed by RC from 2003 to 2016. Following NAC prior to RC, cystoscopy was performed routinely, with resection of residual visible tumor and/or tumor base (transurethral resection [TUR]). For patients with pre-NAC tumor tissue available, tumor sequencing was performed. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Clinical restaging and tumor sequencing were evaluated for their ability to predict the final pathologic stage accurately at RC using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. A total of 114 patients underwent restaging TUR following NAC and prior to RC. The diagnostic accuracy of post-NAC clinical restaging including TUR was poor, with 32% of patients being downstaged falsely when compared with their final RC pathology. Forty-nine patients had sequencing of pre-NAC tumor tissue, of whom 32 showed at least one mutation of interest. However, NAC responses and rates of false downstaging did not differ significantly according to tumor mutation status. This study highlights the inaccuracy of post-NAC clinical restaging TUR with or without adjunctive tumor mutation analysis, to assess pathologic residual disease accurately. Caution must be taken when performing post-NAC restaging, especially when considering conservative management strategies such as active surveillance on this basis. Patient summary: Several groups are evaluating whether certain patients, whose bladder cancer responds well to upfront chemotherapy, may be able to forego cystectomy safely. We demonstrate that currently available staging tools and tumor DNA sequencing cannot identify such patients reliably and accurately.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) includes neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) followed by consolidative therapy with either chemoradiation or radical cystectomy (RC). Some patients experience robust pathologic responses to NAC, and these have been reported to associate with somatic mutations in specific gene pathways including DNA damage response genes.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the ability of post-NAC clinical restaging, with or without tumor sequencing, to predict final RC pathologic staging.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
We reviewed our institutional review board-approved institutional database to identify patients with MIBC who underwent NAC followed by RC from 2003 to 2016. Following NAC prior to RC, cystoscopy was performed routinely, with resection of residual visible tumor and/or tumor base (transurethral resection [TUR]). For patients with pre-NAC tumor tissue available, tumor sequencing was performed. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Clinical restaging and tumor sequencing were evaluated for their ability to predict the final pathologic stage accurately at RC using chi-square or Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
A total of 114 patients underwent restaging TUR following NAC and prior to RC. The diagnostic accuracy of post-NAC clinical restaging including TUR was poor, with 32% of patients being downstaged falsely when compared with their final RC pathology. Forty-nine patients had sequencing of pre-NAC tumor tissue, of whom 32 showed at least one mutation of interest. However, NAC responses and rates of false downstaging did not differ significantly according to tumor mutation status.
CONCLUSIONS
This study highlights the inaccuracy of post-NAC clinical restaging TUR with or without adjunctive tumor mutation analysis, to assess pathologic residual disease accurately. Caution must be taken when performing post-NAC restaging, especially when considering conservative management strategies such as active surveillance on this basis. Patient summary: Several groups are evaluating whether certain patients, whose bladder cancer responds well to upfront chemotherapy, may be able to forego cystectomy safely. We demonstrate that currently available staging tools and tumor DNA sequencing cannot identify such patients reliably and accurately.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32814637
pii: S0302-2838(20)30564-9
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.016
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

364-371

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Russell E N Becker (REN)

The Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute & James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: rbecker@jhmi.edu.

Alexa R Meyer (AR)

The Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute & James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Aaron Brant (A)

Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Adam C Reese (AC)

Department of Urology, Temple Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Michael J Biles (MJ)

The Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute & James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Kelly T Harris (KT)

The Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute & James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

George Netto (G)

Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Andres Matoso (A)

The Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute & James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Jean Hoffman-Censits (J)

The Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute & James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Noah M Hahn (NM)

The Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute & James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Woonyoung Choi (W)

The Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute & James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

David McConkey (D)

The Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute & James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Phillip M Pierorazio (PM)

The Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute & James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Michael H Johnson (MH)

The Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute & James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Mark P Schoenberg (MP)

Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

Max R Kates (MR)

The Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute & James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Alex Baras (A)

The Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute & James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Trinity J Bivalacqua (TJ)

The Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute & James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH