Associations of Variation in Retinal Thickness With Visual Acuity and Anatomic Outcomes in Eyes With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Lesions Treated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents.
Aged
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Bevacizumab
/ administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Male
Ranibizumab
/ administration & dosage
Retina
/ pathology
Tomography, Optical Coherence
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Visual Acuity
/ physiology
Wet Macular Degeneration
/ diagnosis
Journal
JAMA ophthalmology
ISSN: 2168-6173
Titre abrégé: JAMA Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2020
01 10 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
21
8
2020
medline:
24
2
2021
entrez:
21
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
When initiating anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), knowledge of prognostic factors is important for advising patients and guiding treatment. We hypothesized that eyes with greater fluctuation in retinal thickness over time have worse outcomes than eyes with less variation. To investigate whether visual and anatomic outcomes in eyes with nAMD initiating anti-VEGF treatment are associated with fluctuations in retinal thickness. In this study using data from the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT) and the Inhibition of VEGF in Age-Related Choroidal Neovascularization (IVAN) randomized clinical trial, people with previously untreated nAMD were included. Data were collected from February 2008 to November 2012, and data were analyzed from April 2017 to April 2020. Foveal center point thicknesses (FCPTs) were extracted from 1165 study eyes from CATT and 566 study eyes from the IVAN trial, excluding those with 3 measurements or less. For each eye, the SD of FCPT was calculated. Eyes were grouped by FCPT SD quartile. Associations of FCPT SD quartile with outcomes were quantified at month 24 or the last available visit by linear or logistic regression, adjusting for baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and randomized allocations to drug and treatment regimen, for BCVA, development of fibrosis, and development of macular atrophy. Of the 1731 included patients, 1058 (61.1%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 78.6 (7.4) years. The median (interquartile range) FCPT SD was 40.2 (27.1-61.2) in the IVAN cohort and 59.0 (38.3-89.4) in the CATT cohort. After adjustment for baseline BCVA and trial allocations, BCVA worsened significantly across the quartiles of FCPT SD; the difference between the first and fourth quartiles was -6.27 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (95% CI, -8.45 to -4.09). The risk of developing fibrosis and macular atrophy also increased across FCPT SD quartiles. Odds ratios ranged from 1.40 (95% CI, 1.03 to 1.91) for quartile 2 to 1.95 (95% CI, 1.42 to 2.68) for quartile 4 for fibrosis and from 1.32 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.92) for quartile 2 to 2.10 (95% CI, 1.45 to 3.05) for quartile 4 for macular atrophy. Greater variation in retinal thickness in eyes with nAMD during treatment with anti-VEGF was associated with worse BCVA and development of fibrosis and macular atrophy in these post hoc analyses, despite protocol-directed treatment frequency. Practitioners may want to consider variation in retinal thickness when advising patients about their prognosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32816002
pii: 2769560
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.3001
pmc: PMC7441468
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Ranibizumab
ZL1R02VT79
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1043-1051Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 07/36/01
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 12/142/07
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Eye (Lond). 2017 Sep;31(9):1337-1344
pubmed: 28475181
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 04;3:CD005139
pubmed: 30834517
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Jan 2;60(1):304-311
pubmed: 30657855
Ophthalmology. 2017 Jan;124(1):97-104
pubmed: 28079023
Ophthalmology. 2015 Jun;122(6):1212-9
pubmed: 25846847
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Oct;19(78):1-298
pubmed: 26445075
Ophthalmology. 2018 Jun;125(6):878-886
pubmed: 29477692
Ophthalmol Retina. 2018 May;2(5):451-461
pubmed: 31047325
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;96(4):587-90
pubmed: 22289291
PLoS One. 2018 May 17;13(5):e0197670
pubmed: 29772018
Eye (Lond). 2015 Jun;29(6):721-31
pubmed: 25882328
Ophthalmology. 2014 Mar;121(3):656-66
pubmed: 24314839
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 19;364(20):1897-908
pubmed: 21526923
Ophthalmology. 2019 Jan;126(1):75-86
pubmed: 30301555
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;157(4):825-833.e1
pubmed: 24388973
Ophthalmology. 2013 Sep;120(9):1860-70
pubmed: 23642377
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015 May 1;308(9):H1065-77
pubmed: 25724493
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jul;119(7):1388-98
pubmed: 22555112
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct;100(10):1341-5
pubmed: 26755642
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;132(8):915-21
pubmed: 24875610
Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 Jan;3(1):8-15.e1
pubmed: 30929819
Ophthalmology. 2018 Jan;125(1):57-65
pubmed: 28893454
Ophthalmology. 2019 May;126(5):723-734
pubmed: 30502372
Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Feb;85(2):184-8
pubmed: 11159483
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jul 1;57(9):OCT288-98
pubmed: 27409485
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2014 Aug 01;14(10):1-64
pubmed: 26316918
Lancet. 2013 Oct 12;382(9900):1258-67
pubmed: 23870813
Ophthalmology. 2012 Oct;119(10):2082-6
pubmed: 22920670
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jul;119(7):1399-411
pubmed: 22578446
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov;95(7):678-682
pubmed: 28139082