Impact of Health Insurance, Poverty, and Comorbidities on Colorectal Cancer Screening: Insights from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.


Journal

Digestive diseases and sciences
ISSN: 1573-2568
Titre abrégé: Dig Dis Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7902782

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2021
Historique:
received: 23 05 2020
accepted: 06 08 2020
pubmed: 21 8 2020
medline: 23 4 2021
entrez: 21 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite national campaigns and other efforts to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, participation rates remain below targets set by expert panels. We hypothesized that availability and practice patterns of healthcare providers may contribute to this gap. Using data of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey for the years between 2000 and 2016, we extracted demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related data as well as reported experiences about barriers to care, correlating results with answers about recent participation in colorectal cancer screening. As CRC screening guidelines recommend initiation of testing at age 50, we focused on adults 50 years or older. We included responses of 163,564 participants for the period studied. There was a significant increase in CRC screening rates over time. Comorbidity burden, poverty, race, and ethnicity independently predicted participation in screening. Lack of insurance coverage and cost of care played an important role as reported barrier. Convenient access to care, represented by availability of appointments beyond typical business hours, and frequency of provider interactions, correlated with higher rates of screening. Our data show a positive effect of educational efforts and healthcare reform with coverage of screening. Easy and more frequent access to individual providers predicted a higher likelihood of completed screening tests. This finding could translate into more widespread implementation of screening programs, as the increasingly common virtual care delivery offers a new and convenient option to patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Despite national campaigns and other efforts to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, participation rates remain below targets set by expert panels. We hypothesized that availability and practice patterns of healthcare providers may contribute to this gap.
METHOD
Using data of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey for the years between 2000 and 2016, we extracted demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related data as well as reported experiences about barriers to care, correlating results with answers about recent participation in colorectal cancer screening. As CRC screening guidelines recommend initiation of testing at age 50, we focused on adults 50 years or older.
RESULTS
We included responses of 163,564 participants for the period studied. There was a significant increase in CRC screening rates over time. Comorbidity burden, poverty, race, and ethnicity independently predicted participation in screening. Lack of insurance coverage and cost of care played an important role as reported barrier. Convenient access to care, represented by availability of appointments beyond typical business hours, and frequency of provider interactions, correlated with higher rates of screening.
CONCLUSION
Our data show a positive effect of educational efforts and healthcare reform with coverage of screening. Easy and more frequent access to individual providers predicted a higher likelihood of completed screening tests. This finding could translate into more widespread implementation of screening programs, as the increasingly common virtual care delivery offers a new and convenient option to patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32816210
doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06541-7
pii: 10.1007/s10620-020-06541-7
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

70-77

Références

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:145–164.
Joseph DA, King JB, Richards TB, et al. Use of colorectal cancer screening tests by state. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15:E80.
doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170535
National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable ( https://nccrt.org/what-we-do/80-percent-by-2018/ ).
Xu MR, Kelly AMB, Kushi LH, et al. Impact of the affordable care act on colorectal cancer outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2020;58:596–603.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.11.018
Gausman V, Dornblaser D, Anand S, et al. Risk factors associated with early-onset colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.009 .
Honein-AbouHaidar GN, Baxter NN, Moineddin R, et al. Trends and inequities in colorectal cancer screening participation in Ontario, Canada, 2005-2011. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;37:946–956.
doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2013.04.007
Honein-AbouHaidar GN, Kastner M, Vuong V, et al. Systematic review and meta-study synthesis of qualitative studies evaluating facilitators and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2016;25:907–917.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0990
Wang H, Roy S, Kim J, et al. Barriers of colorectal cancer screening in rural USA: a systematic review. Rural Remote Health. 2019;19:5181.
pubmed: 31394041
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ( https://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/ ).
MEPS—Consolidated Household Component Files ( https://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats/download_data_files_results.jsp?cboDataYear=All&cboDataTypeY=1%2CHousehold+Full+Year+File&buttonYearandDataType=Search&cboPufNumber=All&SearchTitle=Consolidated+Data ).
Inadomi JM, Issaka RB, Green BB. What multilevel interventions do we need to increase the colorectal cancer screening rate to 80%? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.016 .
Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:339–359.
doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9100-y
Increased use of colorectal cancer tests–United States, 2002 and 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 55; 2006, no. 11, p. 308.
Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50-75 years—United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 59; 2010, no 12, p. 808.
Muthukrishnan M, Arnold LD, James AS. Patients’ self-reported barriers to colon cancer screening in federally qualified health center settings. Prev Med Rep. 2019;15:100896.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100896
Young WF, McGloin J, Zittleman L, et al. Predictors of colorectal screening in rural Colorado: testing to prevent colon cancer in the high plains research network. J Rural Health. 2007;23:238–245.
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00096.x
Zerhouni YA, Trinh QD, Lipsitz S, et al. Effect of medicaid expansion on colorectal cancer screening rates. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62:97–103.
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001260
Luthra S. Team Trump Says Administration’s Action on Health Care ‘Is Working.’ Is It? Kaiser Health News, January 13, 2020, 2020.
Laszewski R. The Trump and Republican 2020 Health Care Plan. Forbes, January 5, 2020, 2020.
Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Melton LJ 3rd. A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:3186–3194.
doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07129.x
Grobbee EJ, van der Vlugt M, van Vuuren AJ, et al. Diagnostic yield of one-time colonoscopy vs one-time flexible sigmoidoscopy vs multiple rounds of mailed fecal immunohistochemical tests in colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(667–675):e1.
Senore C, Inadomi J, Segnan N, et al. Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review. Gut. 2015;64:1158–1177.
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308081
Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, et al. Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States: update 2018. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(254–272):e11.
Inadomi JM, Vijan S, Janz NK, et al. Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:575–582.
doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.332
Gupta S, Brenner AT, Ratanawongsa N, et al. Patient trust in physician influences colorectal cancer screening in low-income patients. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47:417–423.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.04.020

Auteurs

Andrew J Gawron (AJ)

VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Judith Staub (J)

VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Klaus Bielefeldt (K)

VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Klaus.Bielefeldt@VA.gov.
Division of Gastroenterology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Klaus.Bielefeldt@VA.gov.
George E. Whalen VA Medical Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, 500 Foothill Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84148, USA. Klaus.Bielefeldt@VA.gov.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH