Digital Tumor Board Solutions Have Significant Impact on Case Preparation.
Journal
JCO clinical cancer informatics
ISSN: 2473-4276
Titre abrégé: JCO Clin Cancer Inform
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101708809
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
entrez:
21
8
2020
pubmed:
21
8
2020
medline:
1
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Multidisciplinary tumor boards (TBs) are the gold standard for decision-making in cancer care. Variability in preparation, conduction, and impact is widely reported. The benefit of digital technologies to support TBs is unknown. This study evaluated the impact of the NAVIFY Tumor Board solution (NTB) on TB preparation time across multiple user groups in 4 cancer categories: breast, GI, head and neck (ie, ear, nose, and throat, or ENT), and hematopathology. This prospective study evaluated TB preparation time in multiple phases pre- and post-NTB implementation at an academic health care center. TB preparation times were recorded for multiple weeks using a digital time tracker. Preparation times for 59 breast, 61 GI, 36 ENT, and 71 hematopathology cancer TBs comparing a pre-NTB phase to 3 phases of NTB implementation were evaluated between February 2018 and July 2019. NTB resulted in significant reductions in overall preparation time (30%) across 3 TBs pre-NTB compared with the final post-NTB implementation phase. In the breast TB, NTB reduced overall preparation time by 28%, with a 76% decrease in standard deviation (SD). In the GI TB, a 23% reduction in average preparation time was observed for all users, with a 48% decrease in SD. In the ENT TB, a 33% reduction in average preparation time was observed for all users, with a 73% decrease in SD. The hematopathology TB, which was the cocreation partner and initial adopter of the solution, showed variable results. This study showed a significant impact of a digital solution on time preparation for TBs across multiple users and different TBs, reflecting the generalizability of the NTB. Adoption of such a solution could improve the efficiency of TBs and have a direct economic impact on hospitals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32816529
doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00029
pmc: PMC7469605
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
757-768Références
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;212:219-24
pubmed: 26063280
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Jan;170(1):1-6
pubmed: 2294625
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):w282-93
pubmed: 19174390
Int J Breast Cancer. 2011;2011:831605
pubmed: 22295234
Health Informatics J. 2020 Sep;26(3):2213-2221
pubmed: 31969041
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jan 7;160(1):48-54
pubmed: 24573664
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jan;42:56-72
pubmed: 26643552
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jan 16;105(2):113-21
pubmed: 23274388
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Jan 19;11:49-61
pubmed: 29403284
Indian J Pharmacol. 2012 Mar;44(2):168-72
pubmed: 22529469
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1142-1148
pubmed: 29016973
CA Cancer J Clin. 1987 Mar-Apr;37(2):88-92
pubmed: 3102006
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 28;10(9):e0139074
pubmed: 26413866
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014 Nov;9(6):949-65
pubmed: 24573598
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011;4:47-55
pubmed: 22312227
Methods Inf Med. 2001 May;40(2):90-8
pubmed: 11424310
BMC Bioinformatics. 2018 Sep 26;19(1):341
pubmed: 30257653
Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52
pubmed: 16702590
Am J Manag Care. 2014 Nov;20(11 Spec No. 17):eSP1-8
pubmed: 25811814
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014;:e461-6
pubmed: 24857140
Mil Med. 1975 Aug;140(8):529-31
pubmed: 806846
J Pathol Inform. 2018 Jul 19;9:26
pubmed: 30167341