Implementing smokeless tobacco control policy in Pakistan: a qualitative study among Naswar supply chain actors.
advertising and promotion
low/middle income country
non-cigarette tobacco products
packaging and labelling
public policy
Journal
Tobacco control
ISSN: 1468-3318
Titre abrégé: Tob Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9209612
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
received:
05
03
2020
revised:
11
06
2020
accepted:
16
06
2020
pubmed:
21
8
2020
medline:
16
10
2021
entrez:
21
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To obtain insights into the perceptions of barriers and facilitators to implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) among smokeless tobacco (SLT) supply chain actors in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. We conducted a qualitative study to investigate the perceptions about SLT control policy formulation and implementation among exclusive Naswar sellers and point of sale vendors. We conducted five focus group discussions in three districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa using combined deductive-inductive thematic analyses. We identified three central themes that potentially impact policy formulation, its implementation and application. The first theme examines the role of children in the Naswar business: as potential customers, and as potential heirs to a Naswar-selling business. A second theme targets the 'business of Naswar', which includes a specific identity of Naswar sellers, its potential to generate profits and the special case of Naswar regulation as a socially accepted and culturally rooted product. The third theme addresses the unusual ingredients of Naswar and its production process, making Naswar a health risk for consumers and producers. We also report conflicting views regarding SLT control among the supply chain actors. This study provides insights into the perceptions of important SLT supply-side stakeholders regarding various SLT control policy options based on the FCTC. While there is some opposition to policy approaches like taxation and switching of business, implementing a ban on selling SLT to minors may be a viable option for policymakers in the short term.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32817262
pii: tobaccocontrol-2020-055748
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055748
pmc: PMC8394737
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
548-552Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Tob Control. 2012 Mar;21(2):172-80
pubmed: 22345242
BMC Med. 2015 Aug 17;13:194
pubmed: 26278072
J Community Health. 2012 Oct;37(5):963-7
pubmed: 22197961
Harm Reduct J. 2014 Jan 17;11:2
pubmed: 24433301
Tob Control. 2016 Jul;25(4):437-43
pubmed: 26202320
Tob Control. 2011 Sep;20(5):327-37
pubmed: 21606180
IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2007;89:1-592
pubmed: 18335640
Am J Public Health. 2012 Nov;102(11):2088-93
pubmed: 22813086
Tob Control. 2013 May;22 Suppl 1:i45-6
pubmed: 23591509
Tob Induc Dis. 2016 Nov 21;14:36
pubmed: 27895546
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):32-40
pubmed: 29294113
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Jun;16(6):890-4
pubmed: 24616238
Prev Med. 2005 Aug;41(2):424-32
pubmed: 15917037
Tob Control. 2012 Nov;21(6):589-92
pubmed: 23002179
Tob Control. 2011 May;20(3):235-8
pubmed: 21115556
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 10;12(7):e0180445
pubmed: 28692704
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2013 Jan;3(1):12-8
pubmed: 24478974
Popul Health Metr. 2013 Sep 03;11(1):16
pubmed: 24004968
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Apr;18(4):424-30
pubmed: 25795659