Cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular imaging for stable coronary heart disease.
cardiac imaging and diagnostics
cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging
health care economics
Journal
Heart (British Cardiac Society)
ISSN: 1468-201X
Titre abrégé: Heart
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9602087
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
31
03
2020
revised:
23
06
2020
accepted:
28
06
2020
pubmed:
21
8
2020
medline:
7
9
2021
entrez:
21
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the cost-effectiveness of management strategies for patients presenting with chest pain and suspected coronary heart disease (CHD): (1) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR); (2) myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS); and (3) UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline-guided care. Using UK data for 1202 patients from the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Heart Disease 2 trial, we conducted an economic evaluation to assess the cost-effectiveness of CMR, MPS and NICE guidelines. Health outcomes were expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and costs reflected UK pound sterling in 2016-2017. Cost-effectiveness results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and incremental net health benefits overall and for low, medium and high pretest likelihood of CHD subgroups. CMR had the highest estimated QALY gain overall (2.21 (95% credible interval 2.15, 2.26) compared with 2.07 (1.92, 2.20) for NICE and 2.11 (2.01, 2.22) for MPS) and incurred comparable costs (overall £1625 (£1431, £1824) compared with £1753 (£1473, £2032) for NICE and £1768 (£1572, £1989) for MPS). Overall, CMR was the cost-effective strategy, being the dominant strategy (more effective, less costly) with incremental net health benefits per patient of 0.146 QALYs (-0.18, 0.406) compared with NICE guidelines at a cost-effectiveness threshold of £15 000 per QALY (93% probability of cost-effectiveness). Results were similar in the pretest likelihood subgroups. CMR-guided care is cost-effective overall and across all pretest likelihood subgroups, compared with MPS and NICE guidelines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32817271
pii: heartjnl-2020-316990
doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316990
pmc: PMC7892375
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
381-388Subventions
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : FS/13/71/30378
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : RE/13/5/30177
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : SP/12/1/29062
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : FS/15/54/31639
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : FS/1062/28409
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N003403/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: CB is employed by the University of Glasgow, which holds research and/or consultancy agreements with AstraZeneca, Abbott Vascular, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, HeartFlow, Opsens and Novartis.
Références
Heart. 2017 Jul;103(13):995-1001
pubmed: 28246175
Am Heart J. 2015 Jan;169(1):17-24.e1
pubmed: 25497243
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004 Oct;9(4):197-204
pubmed: 15509405
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Apr 7;162(7):474-84
pubmed: 25844996
Health Econ. 2005 May;14(5):487-96
pubmed: 15497198
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 9;382(15):1395-1407
pubmed: 32227755
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jul 5;165(1):1-9
pubmed: 27158921
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 11;362(10):886-95
pubmed: 20220183
BMJ. 2018 Feb 21;360:k504
pubmed: 29467161
Heart. 2013 Jun;99(12):873-81
pubmed: 23591668
Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99
pubmed: 21225900
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Oct;17(5):577-590
pubmed: 31098947
JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1051-60
pubmed: 27570866
Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):7-22
pubmed: 28833869
Lancet. 2015 Jun 13;385(9985):2383-91
pubmed: 25788230
Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):453-60
pubmed: 22196944