Reactions to, and trial intentions for, three dissuasive cigarette designs: a cross-sectional survey of adolescents in Scotland.


Journal

Tobacco control
ISSN: 1468-3318
Titre abrégé: Tob Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9209612

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2021
Historique:
received: 14 04 2020
revised: 17 06 2020
accepted: 24 06 2020
pubmed: 21 8 2020
medline: 15 12 2021
entrez: 21 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There has been growing academic and policy interest in opportunities to decrease the appeal of cigarette sticks, such as making them an unattractive colour or requiring them to display a health warning. We therefore explored reactions to, and trial intentions for, three 'dissuasive' cigarette designs among adolescents in Scotland. A cross-sectional survey with 12-17 year olds in Scotland (n=594) was conducted between November 2017 and November 2018. Participants were shown one 'standard' cigarette (imitation cork filter with white paper casing) and three dissuasive cigarettes: (1) a cigarette with the warning 'smoking kills'; (2) a cigarette with the warning 'toxic' and a skull and cross-bones image and (3) a dark green cigarette. Participants rated each cigarette on nine five-point reaction measures (eg, appealing/unappealing or attractive/unattractive). A composite reaction score was computed for each cigarette, which was binary coded (overall negative reactions vs neutral/positive reactions). Participants also indicated whether they would try each cigarette (coded: Yes/No). Demographics, smoking status and smoking susceptibility were also measured. More participants had negative reactions to the dark green (93% of adolescents), 'smoking kills' (94%) and 'toxic' (96%) cigarettes, compared with the standard cigarette (85%). For all three dissuasive designs, Chi-square tests found that negative reactions were more likely among younger adolescents (vs older adolescents), never-smokers (vs ever smokers) and non-susceptible never-smokers (vs susceptible never-smokers). Most participants indicated that they would not try any of the cigarettes (range: 84%-91%). Dissuasive cigarettes present an opportunity to further reduce the appeal of smoking among adolescents.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32817574
pii: tobaccocontrol-2020-055842
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055842
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

623-629

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Danielle Mitchell (D)

Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK danielle.mitchell1@stir.ac.uk.

Nathan Critchlow (N)

Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.

Crawford Moodie (C)

Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.

Linda Bauld (L)

Usher Institute, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
SPECTRUM consortium, Univeristy of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH