"We need more big trees as well as the grass roots": going beyond research capacity building to develop sustainable careers in mental health research in African countries.
Africa
Global mental health
Research Policy
Research capacity strengthening
Research funding
Journal
International journal of mental health systems
ISSN: 1752-4458
Titre abrégé: Int J Ment Health Syst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101294224
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
20
05
2020
accepted:
21
07
2020
entrez:
21
8
2020
pubmed:
21
8
2020
medline:
21
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There are substantial gaps in our knowledge regarding the aetiology of mental, neurological and substance use disorders in sub-Saharan Africa, and the cost-effectiveness and scalability of interventions to reduce the burden of these conditions on the continent. To address these gaps, international investment has focussed on building research capacity, including funding doctoral students in African countries, to support development of high quality, contextually relevant interventions. Absent, however, is an understanding of how capacity building feeds into research careers. Within a broader mental health research capacity-building initiative (African Mental Health Research Initiative), we conducted 52 qualitative interviews with early-career researchers, policymakers, academics, and service users from four African countries (Ethiopia, Malawi, South Africa, and Zimbabwe) and with international funders of mental health research. The interview guide focused on the research context, planning, and priorities and how respondents perceive research careers and funding. Thematic analysis was applied to the transcribed interviews. Five components of a research career emerged: (i) research positions; (ii) research skills; (iii) funding; (iv) research commitment from African countries; and (v) advocacy. All stakeholders wanted more high-impact African researchers, but few saw a clear, replicable track for developing their careers within universities or their Ministries of Health in their African countries. This stemmed, in part, from the lack of support for infrastructure that enables high-quality research: grants administration, mentorship, university leadership, research culture, and open communication between policymakers and researchers. This study highlights the importance of developing research infrastructure alongside capacity-building efforts. International funders should invest in grant management at African universities which would place them at the centre of research initiatives. African universities should prioritise the creation of a research culture by developing and promoting well-defined research tracks for both clinicians and academics, investing in grant management, and raising the profile of research within their institutions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There are substantial gaps in our knowledge regarding the aetiology of mental, neurological and substance use disorders in sub-Saharan Africa, and the cost-effectiveness and scalability of interventions to reduce the burden of these conditions on the continent. To address these gaps, international investment has focussed on building research capacity, including funding doctoral students in African countries, to support development of high quality, contextually relevant interventions. Absent, however, is an understanding of how capacity building feeds into research careers.
METHODS
METHODS
Within a broader mental health research capacity-building initiative (African Mental Health Research Initiative), we conducted 52 qualitative interviews with early-career researchers, policymakers, academics, and service users from four African countries (Ethiopia, Malawi, South Africa, and Zimbabwe) and with international funders of mental health research. The interview guide focused on the research context, planning, and priorities and how respondents perceive research careers and funding. Thematic analysis was applied to the transcribed interviews.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Five components of a research career emerged: (i) research positions; (ii) research skills; (iii) funding; (iv) research commitment from African countries; and (v) advocacy. All stakeholders wanted more high-impact African researchers, but few saw a clear, replicable track for developing their careers within universities or their Ministries of Health in their African countries. This stemmed, in part, from the lack of support for infrastructure that enables high-quality research: grants administration, mentorship, university leadership, research culture, and open communication between policymakers and researchers.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study highlights the importance of developing research infrastructure alongside capacity-building efforts. International funders should invest in grant management at African universities which would place them at the centre of research initiatives. African universities should prioritise the creation of a research culture by developing and promoting well-defined research tracks for both clinicians and academics, investing in grant management, and raising the profile of research within their institutions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32817758
doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00388-1
pii: 388
pmc: PMC7427069
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
66Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
World Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;16(1):30-40
pubmed: 28127922
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2019 Jul 19;6:e16
pubmed: 31391948
Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Mar 1;89(3):184-94
pubmed: 21379414
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Oct 18;4(5):e001853
pubmed: 31750000
Nature. 2011 Jul 06;475(7354):27-30
pubmed: 21734685
Glob Soc Welf. 2019 Sep;6(3):159-175
pubmed: 31984205
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Apr 3;13:21
pubmed: 30988696
Lancet. 2011 Nov 5;378(9803):1654-63
pubmed: 22008420
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015 Jun;24(3):233-40
pubmed: 25833714
Med Educ. 2014 Nov;48(11):1132
pubmed: 25307672
BJPsych Open. 2019 Aug 06;5(5):e67
pubmed: 31530318
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 08;11(9):e0161860
pubmed: 27607240
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1859-1922
pubmed: 30415748
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018 Mar 30;6(1):82-92
pubmed: 29602867
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010 Feb;121(2):152-6
pubmed: 19764927
Lancet. 2013 Nov 9;382(9904):1575-86
pubmed: 23993280
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57940
pubmed: 23469111
PLoS Med. 2012 Feb;9(2):e1001178
pubmed: 22389632
Glob Health Promot. 2013 Dec;20(4 Suppl):6-19
pubmed: 24722739
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Aug;28(4):389-396
pubmed: 30479242
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007 Apr;115(4):257-9
pubmed: 17355515
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Oct 18;4(5):e002068
pubmed: 31750005
PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001359
pubmed: 23300387
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 04;8:247
pubmed: 19055827
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2016 Dec 19;3:e33
pubmed: 28596901
PLoS Med. 2014 Mar 11;11(3):e1001612
pubmed: 24618823
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jan 23;8:19
pubmed: 18215313
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2012 Jan-Feb;20(1):13-24
pubmed: 22335179
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Feb;27(1):3-10
pubmed: 28854998
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 10;13:79
pubmed: 25879831
Acad Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;40(4):679-85
pubmed: 26976395
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;43(2):365-406
pubmed: 24366490
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;26(4):453-9
pubmed: 25137111