The Need to Reconcile Concepts that Characterize Systems Facing Threats.
resilience
risk analysis
systems
Journal
Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
ISSN: 1539-6924
Titre abrégé: Risk Anal
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8109978
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
21
12
2019
revised:
05
04
2020
accepted:
16
07
2020
pubmed:
21
8
2020
medline:
21
8
2020
entrez:
21
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Desirable system performance in the face of threats has been characterized by various management concepts. Through semistructured interviews with editors of journals in the fields of emergency response and systems management, a literature review, and professional judgment, we identified nine related and often interchangeably used system performance concepts: adaptability, agility, reliability, resilience, resistance, robustness, safety, security, and sustainability. A better understanding of these concepts will allow system planners to pursue management strategies best suited to their unique system dynamics and specific objectives of good performance. We analyze expert responses and review the linguistic definitions and mathematical framing of these concepts to understand their applications. We find a lack of consensus on their usage between interview subjects, but by using the mathematical framing to enrich the linguistic definitions, we formulate comparative visualizations and propose distinct definitions for the nine concepts. We present a conceptual framing to relate the concepts for management purposes.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3-15Informations de copyright
© 2020 Society for Risk Analysis.
Références
Boholm, M. (2019). Risk and quantification: A linguistic study. Risk Analysis, 39(6), 1243-1261.
Ch'ng, E. (2007). Modelling the adaptability of biological systems. Open Cybernetics & Systemics Journal, 1, 13-20.
Clausing, D. P. (2004). Operating window: An engineering measure for robustness. Technometrics, 46(1), 25-29.
Creaco, E., Franchini, M., & Todini, E. (2016). The combined use of resilience and loop diameter uniformity as a good indirect measure of network reliability. Urban Water Journal, 13(2), 167-181.
Cosco, T. D., Wister, A., Brayne, C., & Howse, K. (2018). Psychosocial aspects of successful ageing and resilience: Critique, integration and implications/Aspectos psicológicos del envejecimiento exitoso y la resiliencia: Crítica, integración e implicaciones. Estudios de Psicología, 39(2-3), 248-266.
Donohue, I., Hillebrand, H., Montoya, J. M., Petchey, O. L., Pimm, S. L., Fowler, M. S., … Yang, Q. (2016). Navigating the complexity of ecological stability. Ecology Letters, 19(9), 1172-1185.
Ganin, A., Massaro, E., Steen, N., Kott, A., Mangoubi, R., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2016). Operational resilience: Concepts, design and analysis. Nature Scientific Reports, 6,19540.
Gillespie-Marthaler, L., Nelson, K., Baroud, H., & Abkowitz, M. (2019). Selecting indicators for assessing community sustainable resilience. Risk Analysis, 39(11), 2479-2498.
Goldreich, O. (2005). Foundations of cryptography-A primer. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 1(1), 1-116.
Hosseini, S., Barker, K., & Ramirez-Marquez, J. E. (2016). A review of definitions and measures of system resilience. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 145, 47-61.
Klasa, K., Galaitsi, S.E., Trump, B.D., & Linkov, I. (2020). Science and Practice of Resilience: Disaster Systems Applications to Aging Model Development. In A. Wister & T. Cosco (Eds.), Resilience and aging: Emerging science and future possibilities, Risk, Systems and Decisions, New York: Springer. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030570880.
Linkov, I., & Trump, B. D. (2019). The science and practice of resilience. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.
Marchese, D., Reynolds, E., Bates, M. E., Morgan, H., Clark, S. S., & Linkov, I. (2018). Resilience and sustainability: Similarities and differences in environmental management applications. Science of the Total Environment, 613, 1275-1283.
Rand, K., Kurth, M., Fleming, C. H., & Linkov, I. (2020). A resilience matrix approach for measuring and mitigating disaster-induced population displacement. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 42, e101310.
Robinett, III, R. D., Wilson, D. G., & Reed, A. W. (2006). Exergy sustainability for complex systems. InterJournal Complex Systems, 1616, 1-18.
Sayed, T., Saunier, N., Lovegrove, G., & de Leur, P. (2010). Advances in proactive road safety planning. In Proceedings of the 20th Canadian multidisciplinary road safety conference, Niagara Falls, ON, June 6-9, 2010.
Sheppard, J. M., & Young, W. B. (2006). Agility literature review: Classifications, training and testing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(9), 919-932.
Southwick, S. M., Bonanno, G. A., Masten, A. S., Panter-Brick, C., & Yehuda, R. (2014). Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: Interdisciplinary perspectives. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5(1), 25338.
Specking, E., Cottam, B., Parnell, G., Pohl, E., Cilli, M., Buchanan, R., … Small, C. (2019). Assessing engineering resilience for systems with multiple performance measures. Risk Analysis, 39(9), 1899-1912.
Stewart, A. J., Parsons, T. L., & Plotkin, J. B. (2012). Environmental robustness and the adaptability of populations. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 66(5), 1598-1612.
Wied, M., Oehmen, J., & Welo, T. (2020). Conceptualizing resilience in engineering systems: An analysis of the literature. Systems Engineering, 23(1), 3-13.
Wieland, A., & Wallenburg, C. M. (2012). Dealing with supply chain risks: Linking risk management practices and strategies to performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(10), 887-905
Yonson, R., & Noy, I. (2019). Disaster risk management policies and the measurement of resilience for Philippine regions. Risk Analysis, 40(2), 254-275.
Yu, J., & Baroud, H. (2019). Quantifying community resilience using hierarchical bayesian kernel methods: A case study on recovery from power outages. Risk Analysis, 39(9), 1930-1948.