Evaluation of the analgesic effect of vertebral cancellous bone infiltration anaesthesia during vertebroplasty.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Analgesia
/ methods
Anesthesia
/ methods
Anesthesia, Local
/ methods
Bone Cements
Cancellous Bone
Female
Humans
Intraoperative Complications
/ etiology
Male
Pain
/ etiology
Pain Measurement
Patient Satisfaction
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Vertebroplasty
/ adverse effects
Local anaesthesia
VAS
Vertebral cancellous bone infiltration anaesthesia
Vertebroplasty
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Aug 2020
20 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
21
03
2020
accepted:
09
08
2020
entrez:
22
8
2020
pubmed:
21
8
2020
medline:
29
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate the analgesic effect of vertebral cancellous bone infiltration anaesthesia during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Patients treated with vertebral cancellous bone infiltration anaesthesia (intervention group) or local anaesthesia alone (control group) during PVP at our institution during 2016-2018 were reviewed. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score before the operation, during establishment of the puncture channel, during pressure changes in the vertebral body (e.g., when removing or inserting pushers or needle cores), during bone cement injection, immediately after the operation, and at 2 h and 1 day postoperatively were compared between the groups. The patient's satisfaction with the operation was recorded and compared between groups. A total of 112 patients were enrolled (59 cases in the intervention group and 53 cases in the control group). There was no difference in the VAS score between the groups before the operation or during establishment of the intraoperative puncture channel (P > 0.05). The VAS score in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group during pressure changes in the vertebral body (removal or insertion of puncture needle cores or pushers) and bone cement injection (P < 0.05). Immediately after the operation and at 2 h postoperatively, the pain in the intervention group was also significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the groups at 1 day postoperatively (P > 0.05). The patient satisfaction rate was 88% (52/59) in the intervention group and 67% (35/53) in the control group (P < 0.05). Vertebral cancellous bone infiltration anaesthesia may effectively relieve intraoperative pain and improve the surgical experience of patients without affecting the clinical effect of surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32819404
doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01872-7
pii: 10.1186/s13018-020-01872-7
pmc: PMC7441718
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Cements
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
342Subventions
Organisme : Guangdong Medical Science and Technology Research Fund
ID : A2019481
Références
Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(6):429-37
pubmed: 11446557
Acta Chir Plast. 1960;2:59-63
pubmed: 14429057
J Trauma. 1995 Dec;39(6):1153-6
pubmed: 7500411
Osteoporos Int. 2008 Jul;19(7):895-903
pubmed: 18071648
Neurosurgery. 1994 Sep;35(3):415-21; discussion 421
pubmed: 7800132
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan;24(1):39-47
pubmed: 26384132
South Med J. 2001 Apr;94(4):387-93
pubmed: 11332903
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Dec;103(6):901-2
pubmed: 19918028
Int Orthop. 2017 May;41(5):963-968
pubmed: 28161853
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41(8):653-60
pubmed: 26630417
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;114:e677-e688
pubmed: 29555612
Eur Radiol. 2016 Jul;26(7):2352-8
pubmed: 26427699
Eur Radiol. 2017 Apr;27(4):1512-1516
pubmed: 27553927
Can J Anaesth. 2002 Feb;49(2):137-43
pubmed: 11823390
J Neurosurg Sci. 2012 Jun;56(2):105-12
pubmed: 22617173
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Apr 15;25(8):923-8
pubmed: 10767803
Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:35-39
pubmed: 29455043
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Aug 1;32(17):E480-7
pubmed: 17762281
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jun 15;98(12):1041-51
pubmed: 27307365