Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow by Machine Learning Analysis of Modified Dual Bolus MRI Examination.
Machine learning
Magnetic resonance imaging
Modified dual bolus method
Myocardial perfusion imaging
Random forest
Support vector machine
Journal
Annals of biomedical engineering
ISSN: 1573-9686
Titre abrégé: Ann Biomed Eng
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0361512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
31
03
2020
accepted:
11
08
2020
pubmed:
21
8
2020
medline:
6
10
2021
entrez:
22
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising method for estimating myocardial blood flow (MBF). However, it is often affected by noise from imaging artefacts, such as dark rim artefact obscuring relevant features. Machine learning enables extracting important features from such noisy data and is increasingly applied in areas where traditional approaches are limited. In this study, we investigate the capacity of machine learning, particularly support vector machines (SVM) and random forests (RF), for estimating MBF from tissue impulse response signal in an animal model. Domestic pigs (n = 5) were subjected to contrast enhanced first pass MRI (MRI-FP) and the impulse response at different regions of the myocardium (n = 24/pig) were evaluated at rest (n = 120) and stress (n = 96). Reference MBF was then measured using positron emission tomography (PET). Since the impulse response may include artefacts, classification models based on SVM and RF were developed to discriminate noisy signal. In addition, regression models based on SVM, RF and linear regression (for comparison) were developed for estimating MBF from the impulse response at rest and stress. The classification and regression models were trained on data from 4 pigs (n = 168) and tested on 1 pig (n = 48). Models based on SVM and RF outperformed linear regression, with higher correlation (R
Identifiants
pubmed: 32820382
doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02591-0
pii: 10.1007/s10439-020-02591-0
pmc: PMC7851105
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
653-662Subventions
Organisme : Kuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala
ID : VTR n:o 5063530
Organisme : Academy of Finland
ID : #285909
Organisme : Academy of Finland
ID : # 271961
Références
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Mar;28(3):231-237
pubmed: 30636200
J Cheminform. 2017 Jun 28;9(1):42
pubmed: 29086090
J Nucl Med. 1992 Sep;33(9):1669-77
pubmed: 1517842
Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(8):500-510
pubmed: 29777175
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2019 Sep - Oct;38(5):275-279
pubmed: 31402311
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Aug;111:103334
pubmed: 31284153
BMC Med Imaging. 2019 Jul 26;19(1):58
pubmed: 31349798
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Feb 15;103(4):567-71
pubmed: 19195522
Clin Radiol. 2015 Jun;70(6):576-84
pubmed: 25649865
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):210
pubmed: 31694629
J Appl Physiol. 1967 May;22(5):879-88
pubmed: 5337940
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Nov;54(5):1295-9
pubmed: 16200553
Neuroimage. 2004 Oct;23(2):764-75
pubmed: 15488426
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013 Nov 1;305(9):H1297-308
pubmed: 23997096
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Oct;36(10):1594-602
pubmed: 19408000
Arthroscopy. 2014 Sep;30(9):1146-55
pubmed: 24951136
Med Phys. 2002 May;29(5):886-97
pubmed: 12033585
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997 Jan-Feb;7(1):82-90
pubmed: 9039597