Halo score (temporal artery, its branches and axillary artery) as a diagnostic, prognostic and disease monitoring tool for Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA).
Clinical severity index
GCA probability score
Glucocorticoid toxicity
Halo score
Outcomes in GCA
Prognostic factors
Risk stratification
Journal
BMC rheumatology
ISSN: 2520-1026
Titre abrégé: BMC Rheumatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101738571
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
18
02
2020
accepted:
03
05
2020
entrez:
22
8
2020
pubmed:
22
8
2020
medline:
22
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a common large vessel vasculitis of the elderly, often associated with sight loss. Glucocorticoids (GC remain the mainstay of treatment, although biologic treatments have been approved. Biomarkers predicting disease severity, relapse rates and damage are lacking in GCA.EULAR recommends ultrasound (US) as the first investigation for suspected GCA. The cardinal US finding, a non-compressible halo, is currently categorised as either negative or positive. However, the extent and severity of this finding may vary.In this study, we hypothesise whether the extent and severity of the halo sign [calculated as a single composite Halo score (HS)] of temporal and axillary arteries may be of diagnostic, prognostic and monitoring importance; whether baseline HS is linked to disease outcomes, relapses and damage; whether HS can stratify GCA patients for individual treatment needs; whether HS can function as an objective monitoring tool during follow up. This is a prospective, observational study. Suspected GCA Participants will be selected from the GCA FTC at the participating centres in the UK. Informed consent will be obtained, and patients managed as part of standard care. Patients with GCA will have HS (temporal and axillary arteries) measured at baseline and months 1,3,6 and 12 long with routine clinical assessments, blood sampling and patient-reported outcomes (EQ5D). Non-GCA patients will be discharged back to the referral team and will have a telephone interview in 6 months.We aim to recruit 272 suspected GCA referrals which should yield 68 patients (25% of referrals) with confirmed GCA. The recruitment will be completed in 1 year with an estimated total study period of 24 months. The identification of prognostic factors in GCA is both timely and needed. A prognostic marker, such as the HS, could help to stratify GCA patients for an appropriate treatment regimen. Tocilizumab, an IL-6R blocking agent, switches off the acute phase response (C-Reactive Protein), making it difficult to measure the disease activity. Therefore, an independent HS, and changes in that score during treatment and follow-up, maybe a more objective measure of response compare to patient-reported symptoms and clinical assessment alone.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a common large vessel vasculitis of the elderly, often associated with sight loss. Glucocorticoids (GC remain the mainstay of treatment, although biologic treatments have been approved. Biomarkers predicting disease severity, relapse rates and damage are lacking in GCA.EULAR recommends ultrasound (US) as the first investigation for suspected GCA. The cardinal US finding, a non-compressible halo, is currently categorised as either negative or positive. However, the extent and severity of this finding may vary.In this study, we hypothesise whether the extent and severity of the halo sign [calculated as a single composite Halo score (HS)] of temporal and axillary arteries may be of diagnostic, prognostic and monitoring importance; whether baseline HS is linked to disease outcomes, relapses and damage; whether HS can stratify GCA patients for individual treatment needs; whether HS can function as an objective monitoring tool during follow up.
METHODS
METHODS
This is a prospective, observational study. Suspected GCA Participants will be selected from the GCA FTC at the participating centres in the UK. Informed consent will be obtained, and patients managed as part of standard care. Patients with GCA will have HS (temporal and axillary arteries) measured at baseline and months 1,3,6 and 12 long with routine clinical assessments, blood sampling and patient-reported outcomes (EQ5D). Non-GCA patients will be discharged back to the referral team and will have a telephone interview in 6 months.We aim to recruit 272 suspected GCA referrals which should yield 68 patients (25% of referrals) with confirmed GCA. The recruitment will be completed in 1 year with an estimated total study period of 24 months.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The identification of prognostic factors in GCA is both timely and needed. A prognostic marker, such as the HS, could help to stratify GCA patients for an appropriate treatment regimen. Tocilizumab, an IL-6R blocking agent, switches off the acute phase response (C-Reactive Protein), making it difficult to measure the disease activity. Therefore, an independent HS, and changes in that score during treatment and follow-up, maybe a more objective measure of response compare to patient-reported symptoms and clinical assessment alone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32821876
doi: 10.1186/s41927-020-00136-5
pii: 136
pmc: PMC7433165
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
35Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsKSMvdG reports grants from the Mandema Stipend and the Dutch Society for Rheumatology, and personal fees from Roche, outside the submitted work. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Aug 1;59(8):2062-2073
pubmed: 31808526
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Nov;20(90):1-238
pubmed: 27925577
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct;54(10):3310-8
pubmed: 17009270
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Mar-Apr;33(2 Suppl 89):S-103-6
pubmed: 26016758
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Mar-Apr;33(2 Suppl 89):S-98-102
pubmed: 26016757
J Vasc Surg. 2015 May;61(5):1285-91
pubmed: 25659455
RMD Open. 2018 May 17;4(1):e000598
pubmed: 29862043
J Rheumatol. 2018 Aug;45(9):1289-1295
pubmed: 29961687
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Sep;70(9):1366-1376
pubmed: 29648680
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Jul 1;58(7):1123-1125
pubmed: 30423174
RMD Open. 2018 Feb 2;4(1):e000612
pubmed: 29531788
Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Feb;42(2):311-7
pubmed: 10025926
Ann Intern Med. 1998 Sep 1;129(5):417-8
pubmed: 9735071
Perm J. 2013 Winter;17(1):56-62
pubmed: 23596371
Lancet. 1995 Apr 1;345(8953):866
pubmed: 7898257
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Oct;28(9):1722-7
pubmed: 17885247
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):317-328
pubmed: 28745999
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 May 1;58(5):792-797
pubmed: 30544199
Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Jun;31(6):745-9
pubmed: 3382448
Ultraschall Med. 2013 Feb;34(1):47-50
pubmed: 22693039
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Aug;58(8):2574-8
pubmed: 18668559
RMD Open. 2016 Jan 11;2(1):e000137
pubmed: 26819753
Rheumatol Int. 2004 Nov;24(6):340-6
pubmed: 14600785
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008 Jan;47(1):96-101
pubmed: 18077499
Ann Intern Med. 1998 Sep 1;129(5):345-52
pubmed: 9735061
J Am Med Assoc. 1957 Mar 9;163(10):821-7
pubmed: 13405740
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Mar 08;11:44
pubmed: 20210989
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Sep 1;56(9):1479-1483
pubmed: 28431106
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Mar 1;142(5):359-69
pubmed: 15738455
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Dec;36(6):1154-60
pubmed: 12469046
J Med Ultrasound. 2018 Jan-Mar;26(1):3-13
pubmed: 30065507
Br J Surg. 2010 Dec;97(12):1765-71
pubmed: 20799290
Lancet. 2008 Jul 19;372(9634):234-45
pubmed: 18640460
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Mar 1;59(3):e1-e23
pubmed: 31970405
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Mar;79(3):393-399
pubmed: 31900304
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Oct;154(4):617-619.e1
pubmed: 22995557
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Jan;55(1):66-70
pubmed: 26286743
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jan;184(1):283-7
pubmed: 15615989
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2015 Aug;17(8):52
pubmed: 26113013
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Dec 17;:
pubmed: 31848610
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 Mar-Apr;37 Suppl 117(2):104-108
pubmed: 30767870
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 May;77(5):636-643
pubmed: 29358285
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Aug;49(8):1594-7
pubmed: 20371504
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Oct;154(4):722-9
pubmed: 22809782
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Aug;30(4):688-706
pubmed: 27931962