Comparison of Drusen Volume Assessed by Two Different OCT Devices.
AMD
age-related macular degeneration
drusen
drusen volume
optical coherence tomography
retinal imaging analysis
retinal pigment epithelium
segmentation
spectral-domain OCT
swept-source OCT
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Aug 2020
17 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
20
07
2020
revised:
06
08
2020
accepted:
09
08
2020
entrez:
23
8
2020
pubmed:
23
8
2020
medline:
23
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To compare drusen volume between Heidelberg Spectral Domain (SD-) and Zeiss Swept-Source (SS) PlexElite Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) determined by manual and automated segmentation methods. Thirty-two eyes of 24 patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) and drusen maculopathy were included. In the central 1 and 3 mm ETDRS circle drusen volumes were calculated and compared. Drusen segmentation was performed using automated manufacturer algorithms of the two OCT devices. Then, the automated segmentation was manually corrected and compared and finally analyzed using customized software. Though on SD-OCT, there was a significant difference of mean drusen volume prior to and after manual correction (mean difference: 0.0188 ± 0.0269 mm
Identifiants
pubmed: 32824455
pii: jcm9082657
doi: 10.3390/jcm9082657
pmc: PMC7464253
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;255(4):817-824
pubmed: 28127658
Ophthalmology. 1992 Feb;99(2):278-86
pubmed: 1553220
Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Jun;88(6):751-8
pubmed: 21532518
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Apr;57(4):1839-46
pubmed: 27082298
Retina. 2010 Mar;30(3):431-5
pubmed: 19952989
Ophthalmology. 2019 Jun;126(6):829-838
pubmed: 30244144
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Dec 17;53(13):8319-24
pubmed: 23150629
Ophthalmology. 2008 Nov;115(11):1883-90
pubmed: 18722666
Eye (Lond). 2015 Feb;29(2):272-9
pubmed: 25376121
Ophthalmology. 2011 Jul;118(7):1373-9
pubmed: 21388687
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Sep;48(9):4300-7
pubmed: 17724220
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Mar;139(3):455-61
pubmed: 15767053
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Apr 03;54(4):2429-34
pubmed: 23471895
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003 Jan;241(1):39-47
pubmed: 12545291
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jan 05;53(1):53-61
pubmed: 22039246
Am J Ophthalmol. 2001 Nov;132(5):668-81
pubmed: 11704028
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 May 1;58(6):BIO141-BIO150
pubmed: 28658477
Ophthalmology. 2011 Dec;118(12):2434-41
pubmed: 21724264
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2017 Feb 28;6(1):12
pubmed: 28275527
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;99(6):794-800
pubmed: 25563763
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2017 Jul 18;6(4):10
pubmed: 28729948
Surv Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov-Dec;52(6):655-71
pubmed: 18029272
Retina. 2020 Aug;40(8):1471-1482
pubmed: 31404033
Control Clin Trials. 1999 Dec;20(6):573-600
pubmed: 10588299
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Dec;51(12):6715-21
pubmed: 21123769
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb;101(2):198-203
pubmed: 27044341
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jul;116(7):1271-7
pubmed: 19395086