The "No ARSA" Sign: A Novel Method of Prenatal Screening for Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery.
aberrant right subclavian artery
aortic arch anomalies
brachiocephalic artery
prenatal screening
right subclavian artery
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Aug 2020
17 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
18
07
2020
revised:
06
08
2020
accepted:
12
08
2020
entrez:
23
8
2020
pubmed:
23
8
2020
medline:
23
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
An aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) can be overlooked by the conventional method as described by Chaoui et al., due to acoustic shadowing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a novel screening method for ARSA by demonstrating the brachiocephalic artery bifurcation, referred to as the "No ARSA" sign. A prospective study conducted at a tertiary care center between 2018 and 2019 included unselected pregnant patients at a median gestational age of 15.1 (14.2-22.1; IQR (inter-quartile range)) weeks, who had been referred for a routine or targeted anomaly scan. All participants were scanned for the presence or absence of ARSA using both the conventional and the novel "No ARSA" methods for validation purposes. A total of 226 unselected patients were enrolled in the study. The "No ARSA" sign was visualized in 218 fetuses (96.5%). In the remaining 8 cases (3.5%), the "No ARSA" sign was not demonstrated. In these fetuses, an ARSA was visualized by the conventional method. The new method exhibited 100% feasibility and was in complete agreement with the conventional method. Intra- and inter-observer agreement was excellent (κ = 1). The results of the study suggest that the "No ARSA" sign is an efficient and reliable screening tool for ARSA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32824459
pii: jcm9082658
doi: 10.3390/jcm9082658
pmc: PMC7463697
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Prenat Diagn. 2017 Aug;37(8):808-811
pubmed: 28618053
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;31(1):20-4
pubmed: 18157795
Surg Radiol Anat. 2017 May;39(5):559-565
pubmed: 27999944
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):810-815
pubmed: 30584678
J Ultrasound Med. 2017 May;36(5):1015-1019
pubmed: 28258603
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2013;34(3):140-5
pubmed: 24051543
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;36(5):548-52
pubmed: 20503237
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Feb;168(2):481-4
pubmed: 9016231
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;49(3):337-341
pubmed: 27063194
Pediatr Radiol. 2010 Jun;40(6):876-84
pubmed: 20354848
Ultraschall Med. 2012 Dec;33(7):E114-E118
pubmed: 21614745
Radiographics. 2017 Jan-Feb;37(1):32-51
pubmed: 27860551
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;31(1):115-7
pubmed: 18098341
Prenat Diagn. 2013 Mar;33(3):209-13
pubmed: 23319208
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;31(1):25-9
pubmed: 18098348
J Ultrasound Med. 2017 Apr;36(4):785-790
pubmed: 28072476
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2010 Jun;59(3):147-54
pubmed: 19962688
Ultrasonography. 2017 Jul;36(3):278-283
pubmed: 28322033
Clin Anat. 2017 Nov;30(8):1024-1028
pubmed: 28514512
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Jan;285(1):27-30
pubmed: 21487731
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;17(5):367-9
pubmed: 11380958
Med Clin North Am. 1948 Jul;32:925-49
pubmed: 18877614
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;46(3):266-76
pubmed: 25586729
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016;40(3):187-194
pubmed: 26820669
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;192(1):257-63
pubmed: 15672034
Lab Invest. 1953 Jan-Feb;2(1):56-75
pubmed: 13036024
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:292734
pubmed: 25105156
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Aug;44(2):147-53
pubmed: 24585513
Prenat Diagn. 2012 Oct;32(10):968-75
pubmed: 22847746
J Pak Med Assoc. 2006 Sep;56(9):419-21
pubmed: 17091758
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;39(2):191-5
pubmed: 21793087