Optimized CorT Total to compare Scheimpflug vs dual Scheimpflug/Placido imaging devices.
Journal
Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
ISSN: 1873-4502
Titre abrégé: J Cataract Refract Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8604171
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2021
01 02 2021
Historique:
received:
01
05
2020
accepted:
03
08
2020
pubmed:
23
8
2020
medline:
29
7
2021
entrez:
23
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the manufacturer-provided measures of total corneal power (TCP) generated by Scheimpflug and dual Scheimpflug/Placido imaging compared with corneal topographic astigmatism calculated on the basis of measured TCP data (CorT Total). Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Retrospective case series. TCP values were exported from virgin 209 eyes that underwent imaging with both the Scheimpflug (Pentacam HR) and dual Scheimpflug-Placido (Galilei G4) imaging devices to compute an optimized CorT Total. The standard deviation of the ocular residual astigmatism (ORAsd), which serves as a value describing the vectoral difference between the corneal astigmatism measure and manifest refractive cylinder at the corneal plane, was evaluated for all eyes to compare manufacturer-provided measurements vs the optimized CorT Total. The Scheimpflug CorT Total had the lowest ORAsd (0.306 diopter [D]; spherical equivalent [SE] 0.018) of all the parameters evaluated, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = .22) from the dual Scheimpflug/Placido CorT Total (0.32 2 D; SE 0.017). For the Scheimpflug device, the CorT Total had a statistically significant lower (P < .05) ORAsd in comparison to the best measure on the device (total corneal refractive power apex zone 2 mm: 0.324 D; SE 0.021). For dual Scheimpflug/Placido measurements, the CorT Total had the lowest ORAsd (0.322 D; SE 0.017), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .43) from the lowest manufacturer-provided measure (TCP 2). CorT Total generated with the Scheimpflug device corresponded better with the manifest refractive cylinder than all measures of total corneal astigmatism calculated by the software from both the Scheimpflug and the dual Scheimpflug/Placido devices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32826702
pii: 02158034-202102000-00003
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000395
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
153-157Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.
Références
Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, Funovics MA, Skorpik C. Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:892–899
Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ. Comparison of methods to measure corneal power for intraocular lens power calculation using a rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013;39:598–604
Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Lomoriello DS, Ducoli P. Simulated keratometry versus total corneal power by ray tracing: a comparison in prediction accuracy of intraocular lens power. Cornea 2017;36:1368–1372
Alpins NA. New method of targeting vectors to treat astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23:65–75
Arbelaez MC, Alpins N, Verma S, Stamatelatos G, Arbelaez JG, Arba-Mosquera S. Clinical outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis with an aberration-neutral profile centered on the corneal vertex comparing vector planning with manifest refraction planning for the treatment of myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017;43:1504–1514
Wallerstein A, Gauvin M, Qi SR, Bashour M, Cohen M. Primary topography-guided LASIK: treating manifest refractive astigmatism versus topography-measured anterior corneal astigmatism. J Refract Surg 2019;35:15–23
Wallerstein A, Gauvin M, Cohen M, Ozulken K, Motwani M, Yuksel E. Targeting anterior corneal astigmatism with topography-guided ablation ignores ocular residual astigmatism, resulting in inferior outcomes. J Refract Surg 2020;36:63–64
Alpins N, Ong JK, Stamatelatos G. Refractive surprise after toric intraocular lens implantation: graph analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40:283–294
Frings A, Katz T, Steinberg J, Druchkiv V, Richard G, Linke SJ. Ocular residual astigmatism: effects of demographic and ocular parameters in myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40:232–238
Wallerstein A, Gauvin M, Qi SR, Cohen M. Effect of the vectorial difference between manifest refractive astigmatism and anterior corneal astigmatism on topography-guided LASIK outcomes. J Refract Surg 2020;36:449–458
Alpins N, Ong JK, Stamatelatos G. Corneal topographic astigmatism (CorT) to quantify total corneal astigmatism. J Refract Surg 2015;31:182–186
Alpins N, Ong JK, Stamatelatos G. New method of quantifying corneal topographic astigmatism that corresponds with manifest refractive cylinder J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:1978–1988
Alpins N, Ong JKY, Randleman JB, Nevyas-Wallace A, Stamatelatos G. Corneal topographic astigmatism based on total corneal power data (CorT total): a benchmark for total corneal astigmatism. Cornea 2020;39:431–436
Davison AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Vol 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997
Canty A, Ripley B. boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R Package Version 1.3-18. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017. Available at: https://www.r-proj.org