Comparison between 1.5- and 3-T Magnetic Resonance Acquisitions for Direct Targeting Stereotactic Procedures for Deep Brain Stimulation: A Phantom Study.
Accuracy
Comparative study
MRI-based study
Phantom study
Stereotactic neurosurgery
Journal
Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery
ISSN: 1423-0372
Titre abrégé: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 8902881
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
09
03
2020
accepted:
09
06
2020
pubmed:
24
8
2020
medline:
1
6
2021
entrez:
24
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for movement disorders. High magnetic fields could have an impact on distortion. We evaluated 1.5- and 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences for accuracy, precision, and trueness of our MRI-guided direct targeting protocol. Effects of distortion on MR sequences (T1- and T2-weighted sequences) can be evaluated using a dedicated phantom (Elekta). Field strength capabilities were assessed on Siemens Avanto (1.5 T) and Skyra (3 T) scanners. We assessed the precision of our stereotactic MRI-guided procedure. We focused on the risk of error due to a high field strength. Error values on the localizer box were between 0.4 and 0.7 mm at 1.5 T and between 0.6 and 2 mm at 3 T. The most accurate 1.5-T sequence is the 3D FLASH T1-weighted sequence, which had an accuracy value of 0.6 mm. At 3 T, the accuracy value of the isotropic 3D FLASH T1-weighted sequence was 1.6 mm. Given the millimetric size of stereotactic targets and electrodes, lead implantation for neuromodulation therapy needs to be accurate. We demonstrate that 3-T imaging could not be used for stereotaxy in our MRI-guided direct targeting protocol because of a risk of error induced by distortion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32829341
pii: 000509303
doi: 10.1159/000509303
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
337-344Informations de copyright
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.