Integrating depression care within NCD provision in Bangladesh and Pakistan: a qualitative study.
Behavioural activation
Depression
Depression care integration
Mental health policy
Mental-physical co-morbidity
NCD facilities
Non-communicable disease
South Asia
Journal
International journal of mental health systems
ISSN: 1752-4458
Titre abrégé: Int J Ment Health Syst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101294224
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
26
06
2020
accepted:
05
08
2020
entrez:
25
8
2020
pubmed:
25
8
2020
medline:
25
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Co-morbidity of depression with other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) worsens clinical outcomes for both conditions. Low- and middle-income countries need to strengthen mechanisms for detection and management of co-morbid depression within NCDs. The Behavioural Activation for Comorbid Depression in Non-communicable Disease (BEACON) study explored the acceptability and feasibility of integrating a brief depression intervention (behavioural activation, BA) into NCD services in healthcare facilities in Bangladesh and Pakistan. Face-to-face qualitative interviews were conducted with 43 patients and 18 health workers attending or working in NCD centres in four healthcare facilities in Bangladesh and Pakistan, and with three policy makers in each country. The interviews addressed four research questions (1) how NCD care is delivered, (2) how NCD patients experience distress, (3) how depression care is integrated within NCD provision, and (4) the challenges and opportunities for integrating a brief depression intervention into usual NCD care. The data were analysed using framework analysis, organised by capability, opportunity and motivation factors, cross-synthesised across countries and participant groups. Patients and health workers described NCD centres as crowded and time pressured, with waiting times as long as five hours, and consultation times as short as five minutes; resulting in some patient frustration. They did not perceive direct links between their distress and their NCD conditions, instead describing worries about family and finance including affordability of NCD services. Health worker and policy maker accounts suggested these NCD centres lacked preparedness for treating depression in the absence of specific guidelines, standard screening tools, recording systems or training. Barriers and drivers to integrating a brief depression intervention reflected capability, opportunity and motivation factors for all participant groups. While generally valuing the purpose, significant challenges included the busy hospital environment, skill deficits and different conceptions of depression. Given current resource constraints and priorities, integrating a brief psychological intervention at these NCD centres appears premature. An opportune first step calls for responding to patients' expressed concerns on service gaps in provisioning steady and affordable NCD care. Acknowledging differences of conceptions of depression and strengthening psychologically informed NCD care will in turn be required before the introduction of a specific psychological intervention such as BA.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Co-morbidity of depression with other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) worsens clinical outcomes for both conditions. Low- and middle-income countries need to strengthen mechanisms for detection and management of co-morbid depression within NCDs. The Behavioural Activation for Comorbid Depression in Non-communicable Disease (BEACON) study explored the acceptability and feasibility of integrating a brief depression intervention (behavioural activation, BA) into NCD services in healthcare facilities in Bangladesh and Pakistan.
METHODS
METHODS
Face-to-face qualitative interviews were conducted with 43 patients and 18 health workers attending or working in NCD centres in four healthcare facilities in Bangladesh and Pakistan, and with three policy makers in each country. The interviews addressed four research questions (1) how NCD care is delivered, (2) how NCD patients experience distress, (3) how depression care is integrated within NCD provision, and (4) the challenges and opportunities for integrating a brief depression intervention into usual NCD care. The data were analysed using framework analysis, organised by capability, opportunity and motivation factors, cross-synthesised across countries and participant groups.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Patients and health workers described NCD centres as crowded and time pressured, with waiting times as long as five hours, and consultation times as short as five minutes; resulting in some patient frustration. They did not perceive direct links between their distress and their NCD conditions, instead describing worries about family and finance including affordability of NCD services. Health worker and policy maker accounts suggested these NCD centres lacked preparedness for treating depression in the absence of specific guidelines, standard screening tools, recording systems or training. Barriers and drivers to integrating a brief depression intervention reflected capability, opportunity and motivation factors for all participant groups. While generally valuing the purpose, significant challenges included the busy hospital environment, skill deficits and different conceptions of depression.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Given current resource constraints and priorities, integrating a brief psychological intervention at these NCD centres appears premature. An opportune first step calls for responding to patients' expressed concerns on service gaps in provisioning steady and affordable NCD care. Acknowledging differences of conceptions of depression and strengthening psychologically informed NCD care will in turn be required before the introduction of a specific psychological intervention such as BA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32831905
doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00399-y
pii: 399
pmc: PMC7422526
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
63Subventions
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : K43 TW010399
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Lancet. 2011 Oct 22;378(9801):1502-14
pubmed: 22008425
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Jan 1;9(1):1-10
pubmed: 29346635
Transcult Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;46(1):60-85
pubmed: 19293280
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Mar;54(3):466-75
pubmed: 3361419
Lancet. 2007 Sep 8;370(9590):851-8
pubmed: 17826170
World Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;14(3):354-7
pubmed: 26407793
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;208(4):381-8
pubmed: 26494875
Lancet. 2017 Jan 14;389(10065):176-185
pubmed: 27988143
Health Serv Insights. 2017 Mar 28;10:1178632917694350
pubmed: 28469456
J Affect Disord. 2014 Jul;163:88-101
pubmed: 24836093
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1736-1788
pubmed: 30496103
Indian J Community Med. 2011 Dec;36(Suppl 1):S13-22
pubmed: 22628905
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Oct 14;13:64
pubmed: 31636699
Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(2):162-6
pubmed: 21756069
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Nov 12;3(6):e000787
pubmed: 30498584
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 21;9(2):e025300
pubmed: 30796126
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Feb 05;15:15
pubmed: 25652365
PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001443
pubmed: 23690753
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 22;12:474
pubmed: 22726343
World Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;17(1):90-101
pubmed: 29352530
Soc Sci Med. 1989;29(3):327-39
pubmed: 2669146
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2011;7:1-38
pubmed: 21275642
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jul;181:6-7
pubmed: 12091256
Br Med Bull. 2014 Sep;111(1):31-44
pubmed: 25190759
Med J Aust. 2009 Apr 6;190(S7):S54-60
pubmed: 19351294
Qual Health Res. 2012 Aug;22(8):1083-93
pubmed: 22707343
World Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;17(1):76-89
pubmed: 29352539
J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):020417
pubmed: 31893031
J Health Popul Nutr. 2010 Feb;28(1):95-106
pubmed: 20214091
BMJ. 2019 Jan 28;364:l295
pubmed: 30692081
Lancet. 2013 Jun 29;381(9885):2281-90
pubmed: 23684257
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 2;351(10):951-3
pubmed: 15342799