Reducing human pressure on farmland could rescue China's declining wintering geese.

Agricultural land Alternative feeding area Habitat use Northeast China plain Refuge Resource selection function model Satellite tracking Yangtze River floodplain

Journal

Movement ecology
ISSN: 2051-3933
Titre abrégé: Mov Ecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101635009

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 13 06 2020
accepted: 11 08 2020
entrez: 25 8 2020
pubmed: 25 8 2020
medline: 25 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

While goose populations worldwide benefit from food provided by farmland, China's threatened wintering goose populations have failed to capitalize on farmland. It has been proposed that, due to an exceptionally intense human pressure on Chinese farmland, geese cannot exploit farmland in their wintering sites and hence are confined to their deteriorating natural habitat. If this were true, locally decreasing this human pressure on farmland 'refuges' would represent a promising conservation measure. We investigate habitat use of two declining migratory goose species in their core wintering (Yangtze River Floodplain) and stopover (Northeast China Plain) regions, compare the human pressure level at both regions, and adopt a mixed-effect resource selection function model to test how human pressure, food resource type (farmland or wetland/grass), distance to roosts, and their interaction terms influence the utilization of food resources for each species and region. To this aim we use satellite tracking of 28 tundra bean geese Geese use farmland intensively at their stopover site, but hardly at their wintering site, though both regions have farmland available at a similar proportion. The human pressure on both farmland and wetland/grass is significantly lower at the stopover region compared to the wintering region. At both sites, the two goose species actively select for farmland and/or wetland/grass with a relatively low human pressure, positioned relatively close to their roosting sites. Our findings suggest that if human pressure were to decrease in the farmlands close to the roost, China's wintering geese could benefit from farmland. We recommend setting aside farmland near roosting sites that already experiences a relatively low human pressure as goose refuges, and adopt measures to further reduce human pressure and increase food quality and quantity, to help counter the decline of China's wintering goose populations. Our study has important conservation implications and offers a practical measure for migratory waterfowl conservation in areas of high human-wildlife conflict.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
While goose populations worldwide benefit from food provided by farmland, China's threatened wintering goose populations have failed to capitalize on farmland. It has been proposed that, due to an exceptionally intense human pressure on Chinese farmland, geese cannot exploit farmland in their wintering sites and hence are confined to their deteriorating natural habitat. If this were true, locally decreasing this human pressure on farmland 'refuges' would represent a promising conservation measure.
METHODS METHODS
We investigate habitat use of two declining migratory goose species in their core wintering (Yangtze River Floodplain) and stopover (Northeast China Plain) regions, compare the human pressure level at both regions, and adopt a mixed-effect resource selection function model to test how human pressure, food resource type (farmland or wetland/grass), distance to roosts, and their interaction terms influence the utilization of food resources for each species and region. To this aim we use satellite tracking of 28 tundra bean geese
RESULTS RESULTS
Geese use farmland intensively at their stopover site, but hardly at their wintering site, though both regions have farmland available at a similar proportion. The human pressure on both farmland and wetland/grass is significantly lower at the stopover region compared to the wintering region. At both sites, the two goose species actively select for farmland and/or wetland/grass with a relatively low human pressure, positioned relatively close to their roosting sites.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that if human pressure were to decrease in the farmlands close to the roost, China's wintering geese could benefit from farmland. We recommend setting aside farmland near roosting sites that already experiences a relatively low human pressure as goose refuges, and adopt measures to further reduce human pressure and increase food quality and quantity, to help counter the decline of China's wintering goose populations. Our study has important conservation implications and offers a practical measure for migratory waterfowl conservation in areas of high human-wildlife conflict.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32832090
doi: 10.1186/s40462-020-00220-y
pii: 220
pmc: PMC7437007
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

35

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

Sci Data. 2016 Aug 23;3:160067
pubmed: 27552448
Ambio. 2017 Mar;46(Suppl 2):231-240
pubmed: 28215015
Oecologia. 1985 Apr;66(1):122-125
pubmed: 28310823
Curr Biol. 2017 May 22;27(10):R376-R377
pubmed: 28535385
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 23;7:12558
pubmed: 27552116
Ecol Evol. 2018 May 24;8(12):6280-6289
pubmed: 29988414
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 May;92(2):854-877
pubmed: 26946181

Auteurs

Yali Si (Y)

Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Centre for Healthy Cities, Institute for China Sustainable Urbanization, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Jie Wei (J)

Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Wenzhao Wu (W)

Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Wenyuan Zhang (W)

Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Lin Hou (L)

Center for Statistical Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Le Yu (L)

Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Ben Wielstra (B)

Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH