A European survey on the conservative surgical management of endometriotic cysts on behalf of the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) Special Interest Group (SIG) on Endometriosis.
Endometrioma
ablation
cystectomy
excision
laparoscopic surgery
stripping
Journal
Facts, views & vision in ObGyn
ISSN: 2032-0418
Titre abrégé: Facts Views Vis Obgyn
Pays: Belgium
ID NLM: 101578773
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Aug 2020
05 Aug 2020
Historique:
entrez:
25
8
2020
pubmed:
25
8
2020
medline:
25
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The mainstay of endometrioma management, when treatment is required, is surgical. Although laparoscopy is considered to be the gold standard for endometriosis surgery, there is no clarity on the preferred laparoscopic technique, which may depend on whether the primary goalis treatment of infertility or pelvic pain, prevention of recurrence or preservation of ovarian reserve. The aim of this survey to assess the surgical practice of the members of the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) on the conservative management of endometiotic cysts in women of reproductive age. The current survey showed that practice for the conservative management of endometriotic cysts was that laparoscopy accounted for 84.9% of the cases, expectant management for 12.1%, and laparotomy for 3%. The preferred surgical approach was cystectomy in 69% of the cases, while the parameters that determined the preferred surgical method were the diameter of the cyst (62%) and the bilaterality or non-location (53%). The type of energy used was in most cases bipolar (83%), 71.4% of surgeons did not reconstitute the ovary and 41% of responses included the administration of adhesion barrier agents. The primary surgical end-point was ovarian reserve (50%), which was tested preoperatively in 51.8%, mainly with an anti-mullerian hormone. In case of an incidentally deep-infiltrating endometriosis, 55.4% of the responses included concomitant treatment thereof, while 71% of the participants considered that a "pelvic surgeon", who could more effectively treat co- existing pelvic and intestinal disease, should be the ideal one to effectively manage endometriosis. The majority of participants (74%) in this survey consider that there is insufficient scientific evidence regarding the conservative management of endometriotic cysts. The treatment of ovarian endometrioma should be individualised, taking into consideration not only the relief of symptoms, pregnancy rates or recurrence rates, but also ovarian function and reserve after surgery.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
105-108Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Facts, Views & Vision.
Références
Hum Reprod Open. 2017 Dec 19;2017(4):hox016
pubmed: 31486802
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 May-Jun;16(3):269-81
pubmed: 19423059
Hum Reprod Update. 2019 May 1;25(3):375-391
pubmed: 30715359
Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):71-7
pubmed: 19393996
Hum Reprod. 2010 Mar;25(3):672-7
pubmed: 20035000
Hum Reprod. 2014 Mar;29(3):400-12
pubmed: 24435778
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep;47(7):265-274
pubmed: 29920379
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Apr;297(4):1043-1057
pubmed: 29344847
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;125(1):79-88
pubmed: 25560108
BJOG. 2013 Oct;120(11):1308-20
pubmed: 23834505
Fertil Steril. 2009 Jul;92(1):75-87
pubmed: 18692796
Hum Reprod. 2016 Jun;31(6):1208-18
pubmed: 27112700
Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Nov-Dec;21(6):809-25
pubmed: 26168799
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2020 Mar 27;11(4):269-297
pubmed: 32322824