A hinge position distal to the adductor tubercle minimizes the risk of hinge fractures in lateral open wedge distal femoral osteotomy.
Distal femoral osteotomy
Hinge fracture
Open wedge
Safe zone
Target point
Valgus deformity
Journal
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
ISSN: 1433-7347
Titre abrégé: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9314730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
29
06
2020
accepted:
14
08
2020
pubmed:
25
8
2020
medline:
25
9
2021
entrez:
25
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the incidence and morphology of medial cortical hinge fractures in lateral open wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOW-DFO) and to determine a safe zone for the position of the osteotomy hinge to minimize the risk of hinge fractures. Consecutive patients who underwent LOW-DFO for symptomatic valgus malalignment were screened for eligibility for this retrospective observational cohort study. Demographical and surgical data were collected. The incidence and morphology of medial cortical hinge fractures were evaluated on standard postoperative anterior-posterior knee radiographs. Comprehensive measurements evaluating the osteotomy gap and the position of the osteotomy hinge were taken. Additionally, each osteotomy hinge was assigned to a corresponding sector of a proposed five-sector grid of the distal medial femur. A total of 100 patients (60% female) with a mean age of 31 ± 13 years were included. The overall incidence of medial cortical hinge fractures was 46% and three distinct fracture types were identified. The most frequently observed fracture type was extension of the osteotomy gap (76%), followed by a proximal (20%) and distal (4%) course of the fracture line in relation to the hinge. Group comparison (hinge fracture vs. no hinge fracture) showed statistically significant higher values for the height of the osteotomy gap (p = 0.001), the wedge angle (p = 0.036), and the vertical distance between the hinge and the proximal margin of the adductor tubercle (AT; p = 0.002) in the hinge fracture group. Furthermore, a significantly lower horizontal distance between the hinge and the medial cortical bone (p = 0.036) was observed in the hinge fracture group. A statistically significant higher incidence of medial cortical hinge fractures was observed when the position of the osteotomy hinge was proximal compared to distal to the proximal margin of the AT (53% vs. 27%; p = 0.023). Medial cortical hinge fractures in LOW-DFO are a common finding with three distinct fracture types. To minimize the risk of medial cortical hinge fractures, it is recommended to aim for a position of the osteotomy hinge at the level of or distal to the proximal margin of the adductor tubercle. Prognostic study; Level III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32833073
doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06244-6
pii: 10.1007/s00167-020-06244-6
pmc: PMC8458183
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3382-3391Informations de copyright
© 2020. The Author(s).
Références
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 May;24(5):1702-9
pubmed: 26792566
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jul;27(7):2375-2384
pubmed: 30547307
Int Orthop. 2019 Oct;43(10):2315-2322
pubmed: 30426177
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jul;23(7):2061-7
pubmed: 24676790
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):832-837
pubmed: 26254088
Knee. 2014 Jan;21(1):172-5
pubmed: 24041521
Arthroscopy. 2018 Nov;34(11):3073-3079
pubmed: 30292595
HSS J. 2017 Jul;13(2):128-135
pubmed: 28690462
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1291-1298
pubmed: 30539305
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Jan;21(1):90-5
pubmed: 22009558
Arthroscopy. 2018 Apr;34(4):1032-1043
pubmed: 29229417
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Aug;29(4):320-329
pubmed: 28577210
Arthroscopy. 2019 Jun;35(6):1713-1720
pubmed: 31078358
Am J Sports Med. 2014 May;42(5):1118-26
pubmed: 24634450
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Mar;140(3):303-311
pubmed: 31317302
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Nov;46(13):3237-3244
pubmed: 30265819
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Jun;131(6):725-8
pubmed: 20945150
J Knee Surg. 2018 Sep;31(8):747-753
pubmed: 29216674
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2009-15
pubmed: 25537806
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Jan;21(1):249-54
pubmed: 23011581
J Knee Surg. 2019 Mar;32(3):274-279
pubmed: 29618147
Bone Joint J. 2015 Sep;97-B(9):1226-31
pubmed: 26330589
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Aug;23(8):2202-2207
pubmed: 24792071
Int Orthop. 2018 Jan;42(1):9-15
pubmed: 28534192
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jun;46(7):1632-1640
pubmed: 29688749
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jul;99-B(7):887-893
pubmed: 28663393
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Jan;21(1):206-12
pubmed: 22766687
J Orthop Sci. 2012 Nov;17(6):745-9
pubmed: 22868701
Knee. 2017 Jun;24(3):608-614
pubmed: 28318932
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Dec;26(12):3572-3581
pubmed: 29869201
Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Nov 28;5(6):e1357-e1366
pubmed: 28149734
Bone Joint J. 2017 Oct;99-B(10):1313-1318
pubmed: 28963152
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Oct;47(12):2945-2951
pubmed: 31465238
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Mar;19(3):333-9
pubmed: 21153542
Arthroscopy. 2012 Jan;28(1):85-94
pubmed: 21982387
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Jan;138(1):19-25
pubmed: 29079908