Percutaneous transesophageal gastro-tubing for the management of anastomotic leakage after upper GI surgery: a report of two clinical cases.
Anastomotic leakage
Double-lumen feeding tube
Percutaneous transesophageal gastro-tubing
Transnasal drainage
Upper GI surgery
Journal
Surgical case reports
ISSN: 2198-7793
Titre abrégé: Surg Case Rep
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101662125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Aug 2020
24 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
26
05
2020
accepted:
28
07
2020
entrez:
25
8
2020
pubmed:
25
8
2020
medline:
25
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Anastomotic leakage is a serious, sometimes critical complication of upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. The cavity and target drainage tubes are difficult to reach; therefore, a nasogastric tube (NGT) and fasting are required for an extended period. We successfully treated and managed two patients with anastomotic leakage using percutaneous transesophageal gastro-tubing (PTEG). In case 1, a 79-year-old man with gastric cancer underwent total gastrectomy; 1 week later, he underwent emergent open laparotomy due to panperitonitis attributed to anastomotic leakage-related jejunojejunostomy. We resected the portion between esophagojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy and reconstructed it using the Roux-en-Y technique. On postoperative day (POD) 9, anastomotic leakage was diagnosed at the esophagojejunostomy site and jejunotomy staple line. After using a circular stapler for jejunojejunostomy, a stapled jejunal closure was added. We inserted an NGT and performed aspiration for bowel decompression. As he did not improve within 2 weeks, we decided to perform PTEG to free him of the NGT. We kept performing intermittent aspiration; leakage stopped shortly after, due to effective inner drainage. The PTEG catheter was removed after oral intake was restarted. In case 2, an 81-year-old man with esophagogastric junction cancer underwent resection of the distal esophagus and proximal stomach. After shaping the remnant stomach, esophagogastrostomy was performed under the right thoracotomy. On POD 11, anastomotic leakage was identified, along with a mediastinal abscess. We inserted an NGT into the abscess cavity through the anastomotic leakage site. On POD 25, we performed PTEG and inserted a drainage tube, instead of an NGT. Although the abscess cavity disappeared, anastomotic leakage persisted as a fistula. We exchanged the PTEG with a double elementary diet (W-ED) tube with jejunal extension, with the side hole located near the anastomosis. The anastomotic fistula disappeared after treatment. Dysphagia persisted due to disuse atrophy of swallowing musculature; PTEG was useful for enteral feeding, even after the leakage occurred. Patients are sometimes forced to endure pain for a long time for transnasal inner drainage. Using PTEG, patients will be free of sinus pain and discomfort; PTEG should be helpful for patients withstanding NGT.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Anastomotic leakage is a serious, sometimes critical complication of upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. The cavity and target drainage tubes are difficult to reach; therefore, a nasogastric tube (NGT) and fasting are required for an extended period. We successfully treated and managed two patients with anastomotic leakage using percutaneous transesophageal gastro-tubing (PTEG).
CASE PRESENTATION
METHODS
In case 1, a 79-year-old man with gastric cancer underwent total gastrectomy; 1 week later, he underwent emergent open laparotomy due to panperitonitis attributed to anastomotic leakage-related jejunojejunostomy. We resected the portion between esophagojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy and reconstructed it using the Roux-en-Y technique. On postoperative day (POD) 9, anastomotic leakage was diagnosed at the esophagojejunostomy site and jejunotomy staple line. After using a circular stapler for jejunojejunostomy, a stapled jejunal closure was added. We inserted an NGT and performed aspiration for bowel decompression. As he did not improve within 2 weeks, we decided to perform PTEG to free him of the NGT. We kept performing intermittent aspiration; leakage stopped shortly after, due to effective inner drainage. The PTEG catheter was removed after oral intake was restarted. In case 2, an 81-year-old man with esophagogastric junction cancer underwent resection of the distal esophagus and proximal stomach. After shaping the remnant stomach, esophagogastrostomy was performed under the right thoracotomy. On POD 11, anastomotic leakage was identified, along with a mediastinal abscess. We inserted an NGT into the abscess cavity through the anastomotic leakage site. On POD 25, we performed PTEG and inserted a drainage tube, instead of an NGT. Although the abscess cavity disappeared, anastomotic leakage persisted as a fistula. We exchanged the PTEG with a double elementary diet (W-ED) tube with jejunal extension, with the side hole located near the anastomosis. The anastomotic fistula disappeared after treatment. Dysphagia persisted due to disuse atrophy of swallowing musculature; PTEG was useful for enteral feeding, even after the leakage occurred.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Patients are sometimes forced to endure pain for a long time for transnasal inner drainage. Using PTEG, patients will be free of sinus pain and discomfort; PTEG should be helpful for patients withstanding NGT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32833125
doi: 10.1186/s40792-020-00965-z
pii: 10.1186/s40792-020-00965-z
pmc: PMC7445208
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
214Références
Case Rep Surg. 2018 Mar 27;2018:9806259
pubmed: 29796333
Obes Surg. 2014 Sep;24(9):1576-80
pubmed: 24917053
Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2314-8
pubmed: 18622539
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Aug;58(2):306-310
pubmed: 31071424
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2001 Dec;28 Suppl 1:141-6
pubmed: 11787282
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):315-327
pubmed: 28664443
Clin Case Rep. 2016 Jan 26;4(3):305-6
pubmed: 27014459
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Sep;401(6):903-8
pubmed: 27516076
Asian J Surg. 2018 Sep;41(5):498-505
pubmed: 28844781
Surg Neurol. 2009 Sep;72(3):278-9; discussion 280
pubmed: 18617229
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013 May;6(2):90-5
pubmed: 23228055
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Mar;33(3):337-340
pubmed: 29270785
Surg Case Rep. 2019 Oct 24;5(1):152
pubmed: 31650260
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1998 Dec;25 Suppl 4:695-9
pubmed: 9884667
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Jul;24(7):1011-7
pubmed: 23796088
J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:470-474
pubmed: 30463759
Surg Endosc. 2003 Aug;17(8):1224-7
pubmed: 12739113
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 May;56(5):586-92
pubmed: 23575397
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jun;26(6):1509-15
pubmed: 22179470
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):402-6
pubmed: 20152318
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Jan 12;6:12-6
pubmed: 27158483
Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;36(3):623-650
pubmed: 28385477
Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;27(3):333-340
pubmed: 30217286
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec;10(12):911-917
pubmed: 29204186
Obes Surg. 2011 Aug;21(8):1232-7
pubmed: 21416198
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jun;28(6):2563-2569
pubmed: 31494734
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Nov;201(5):695-700
pubmed: 16256911
Ann Coloproctol. 2018 Dec;34(6):317-321
pubmed: 30572421
Case Rep Oncol. 2019 Nov 28;12(3):901-908
pubmed: 31911776