Efficacy of the eribulin, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab combination therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, single arm, phase II study (JBCRG-M03 study).
Adult
Aged
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Female
Furans
/ therapeutic use
Humans
Ketones
/ therapeutic use
Middle Aged
Nitrosourea Compounds
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ biosynthesis
Trastuzumab
/ therapeutic use
Anti-HER2 drug
Chemotherapy
Eribulin
Metastatic breast cancer
Pertuzumab
Journal
Investigational new drugs
ISSN: 1573-0646
Titre abrégé: Invest New Drugs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309330
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
23
07
2020
accepted:
18
08
2020
pubmed:
25
8
2020
medline:
1
2
2022
entrez:
25
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Purpose To date, it is not clear which anticancer agent is useful in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab As the first and second selective regimens for advanced or metastatic breast cancer (AMBC), this multicenter, open-label, phase II trial (JBCRG-M03: UMIN000012232) presents a prespecified analysis of eribulin in combination with pertuzumab and trastuzumab. Methods We enrolled 50 patients with no or single prior chemotherapy for HER2-positive AMBC during November 2013-April 2016. All patients received adjuvant or first-line chemotherapy with trastuzumab and a taxane. The treatment comprised eribulin on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle and trastuzumabplus pertuzumab once every 3 weeks, all administered intravenously. While the primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were the response rate and safety. Results Of 50 patients, 49 were eligible for safety analysis, and the full analysis set (FAS) included 46 patients. We treated 8 (16%) and 41 (84%) patients in first- and second-line settings, respectively. While 11 patients (23.9%) had advanced disease, 35 (76.1%) had metastatic disease. The median PFS was 9.2 months for all patients [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.0-11.4]. In the FAS, 44 patients had the measurable lesions and the complete response rate (CR) was 17.4%, and partial response rate (PR) was 43.5%. The grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (5 patients, 10.2%), including febrile neutropenia (2 patients, 4.1%), hypertension (3 patients, 6.1%), and other (1 patient). The average of the left ventricular ejection fraction did not decline markedly. No symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction was observed. Conclusions In patients with HER2-positive AMBC, eribulin, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab combination therapy exhibited substantial antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile. Hence, we have started a randomized phase III study comparing eribulin and a taxane in combination with pertuzumab and trastuzumab for the treatment of HER2-positive AMBC. Trial registration ID: UMIN-CTR: UMIN000012232.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32833136
doi: 10.1007/s10637-020-00991-6
pii: 10.1007/s10637-020-00991-6
pmc: PMC7851001
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Furans
0
Ketones
0
Nitrosourea Compounds
0
N-neopentyl-N-nitrosourea
22429-25-0
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
pertuzumab
K16AIQ8CTM
eribulin
LR24G6354G
Trastuzumab
P188ANX8CK
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
217-225Références
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 20;29(3):264-71
pubmed: 21149659
Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2007 Dec;7(8):730-42
pubmed: 18220533
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 May 19;96(10):739-49
pubmed: 15150302
Br J Cancer. 2014 Mar 18;110(6):1497-505
pubmed: 24569463
Cancer Cell. 2004 Apr;5(4):317-28
pubmed: 15093539
Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Dec 13;18(1):126
pubmed: 27955684
Cancer Res. 2009 Dec 15;69(24):9330-6
pubmed: 19934333
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):109-19
pubmed: 22149875
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):724-34
pubmed: 25693012
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 10;33(5):442-7
pubmed: 25547504
Clin Breast Cancer. 2014 Dec;14(6):405-12
pubmed: 25024001
Nature. 2018 Feb 22;554(7693):544-548
pubmed: 29443960
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2015 Mar;34(1):157-64
pubmed: 25712293
Biochemistry. 2010 Feb 16;49(6):1331-7
pubmed: 20030375
Science. 1987 Jan 9;235(4785):177-82
pubmed: 3798106
Sci Signal. 2017 Aug 29;10(494):
pubmed: 28851824
Cancer Sci. 2017 Nov;108(11):2273-2280
pubmed: 28869796
Br J Cancer. 2016 May 24;114(11):1212-8
pubmed: 27140309
Mol Cancer Ther. 2005 Jul;4(7):1086-95
pubmed: 16020666
Breast. 2017 Oct;35:78-84
pubmed: 28662406
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 1;31(31):3997-4013
pubmed: 24101045
Nature. 2003 Feb 13;421(6924):756-60
pubmed: 12610629
Nature. 2018 Feb 22;554(7693):538-543
pubmed: 29443964
Mol Cancer Ther. 2008 Jul;7(7):2003-11
pubmed: 18645010
Cancer Cell. 2002 Aug;2(2):127-37
pubmed: 12204533
Trials. 2020 May 7;21(1):391
pubmed: 32381018
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2144-9
pubmed: 21464403
Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Dec 09;17(1):150
pubmed: 27391598
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 5;357(1):39-51
pubmed: 17611206
Cancer Res. 2004 Apr 1;64(7):2343-6
pubmed: 15059883
Mol Diagn Ther. 2013 Apr;17(2):85-99
pubmed: 23529353
Lancet. 2011 Mar 12;377(9769):914-23
pubmed: 21376385