Copper at the crossroads: Assessment of the interactions between low-carbon energy transition and supply limitations.
Bottom-up modelling
Copper
Energy transition
Power sector
Recycling
Transport sector
Journal
Resources, conservation, and recycling
ISSN: 0921-3449
Titre abrégé: Resour Conserv Recycl
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9891750
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
30
01
2020
revised:
23
07
2020
accepted:
25
07
2020
entrez:
25
8
2020
pubmed:
25
8
2020
medline:
25
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This article aims to assess the impact of copper availability on the energy transition and to determine whether copper could become critical due to the high copper content of low-carbon technologies compared to conventional technologies. In assessing copper availability through to 2050, we rely on our linear programming world energy-transport model, TIAM-IFPEN. We examine two climate scenarios (2 °C and 4 °C) with two mobility shape, implemented with a recycling chain. The penetration of low-carbon technologies in the transport and energy sectors (electric vehicles and low-carbon power generation technologies) is likely to significantly increase copper demand by 2050. To investigate how tension over copper resources can be reduced in the energy transition context, we consider two public policy drivers: sustainable mobility and recycling practices. Results show that in the most stringent scenario, the cumulative primary copper demand between 2010 and 2050 is found to be 89.4% of the copper resources known in 2010. They also pinpoint the importance of China and Chile in the future evolution of the copper market.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32834490
doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105072
pii: S0921-3449(20)30389-X
pii: 105072
pmc: PMC7391239
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
105072Informations de copyright
© 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Apr 15;478:80-9
pubmed: 24530587
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 19;112(20):6277-82
pubmed: 25288741
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 31;103(5):1209-14
pubmed: 16432205
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Dec 1;536:142-149
pubmed: 26204050
Environ Res. 2016 Oct;150:182-190
pubmed: 27295408
Waste Manag. 2016 Mar;49:427-436
pubmed: 26818182
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jun 2;49(11):6430-7
pubmed: 25927890
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Oct 1;53(19):11323-11336
pubmed: 31432667
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Jan 17;46(2):1063-70
pubmed: 22191617
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Jun 18;47(12):6564-72
pubmed: 23725041
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Mar 20;46(6):3406-14
pubmed: 22304002
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jan 2;53(1):224-233
pubmed: 30511575