Occupant-based energy upgrades selection for Canadian residential buildings based on field energy data and calibrated simulations.

Calibration models Decision making Dwelling Energy performance upgrade Occupancy profiles

Journal

Journal of cleaner production
ISSN: 0959-6526
Titre abrégé: J Clean Prod
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101538287

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 16 01 2020
revised: 15 05 2020
accepted: 20 05 2020
entrez: 25 8 2020
pubmed: 25 8 2020
medline: 25 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Occupant behavior in residential buildings has a direct impact on the effectiveness of energy-saving measures. In order to realize a buildings' carbon mitigation targets, the impact of individual occupancy profiles needs to be integrated with building simulation models. This paper introduces a decision support framework as a potential solution to make energy performance upgrade choices based on different occupancy profiles. This framework has been demonstrated through a case study of two single-family detached homes in Canada, which were highly instrumented with sensors for monitoring energy input and output. The case studies represented two common occupancy profiles-(1) a family of four (consisting of 2 working adults and 2 teenagers); and (2) a retired couple. Firstly, calibrated energy models were developed by using one-year energy use data collected through an intrusive load monitoring technique. Secondly, energy upgrade combinations were considered for each profile and tested for additional investment, payback period and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Lastly, the most suitable combination of energy upgrade for each profile was ranked using a multi-criteria decision-making method (e.g., TOPSIS). Results indicated that the retired couple used more energy than the family of four and required energy upgrades with usually higher payback periods to achieve the same level of GHG emission reduction. The results of this research are timely for energy policymaking and developing best management practices, which need to be implemented along with the deployment of more stringent building standards and codes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32834562
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122430
pii: S0959-6526(20)32477-X
pii: 122430
pmc: PMC7295710
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

122430

Informations de copyright

© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Environ Int. 2019 Dec;133(Pt A):105164
pubmed: 31518939

Auteurs

Anber Rana (A)

School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, 1137 Alumni Avenue, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.

Piyaruwan Perera (P)

School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, 1137 Alumni Avenue, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.

Rajeev Ruparathna (R)

Faculty of Engineering, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4, Canada.

Hirushie Karunathilake (H)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Katubedda, Moratuwa, 10400, Sri Lanka.

Kasun Hewage (K)

School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, 1137 Alumni Avenue, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.

M Shahria Alam (MS)

School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, 1137 Alumni Avenue, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.

Rehan Sadiq (R)

School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, 1137 Alumni Avenue, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.

Classifications MeSH