Tibial lengthening using a retrograde magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening device in 10 patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion.
Adolescent
Ankle Joint
/ pathology
Arthrodesis
/ adverse effects
Bone Diseases
/ congenital
Bone Lengthening
/ adverse effects
Bone Neoplasms
/ surgery
Female
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary
/ instrumentation
Germany
Humans
Leg Length Inequality
/ etiology
Magnets
Male
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
Postoperative Complications
/ surgery
Plastic Surgery Procedures
/ methods
Tibia
/ surgery
Young Adult
Journal
Acta orthopaedica
ISSN: 1745-3682
Titre abrégé: Acta Orthop
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 101231512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
25
8
2020
medline:
11
2
2021
entrez:
25
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background and purpose - Motorized intramedullary lengthening nails (ILNs) have been developed as an alternative to external fixators for long bone lengthening. The antegrade approach represents the standard method for tibial ILN insertion. In patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion a retrograde approach provides an alternative technique that has not been evaluated so far. We report the outcome of this method in 10 patients. Patients and methods - This retrospective study included 10 patients (mean age 18 years [13-25]) with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion who underwent tibial lengthening with a retrograde ILN (PRECICE). The mean leg length discrepancy (LLD) was 58 mm (36-80). The underlying conditions were congenital (n = 9) and post tumor resection (n = 1). The main outcome measures were: ILN reliability, distraction achieved, distraction index (DIX), time to bone healing, consolidation index (CIX), complications, and functional results. Results - All patients achieved the goal of lengthening (mean 48 mm [26-80]). Average DIX was 0.6 mm/day (0.5-0.7) and mean CIX was 44 days/cm (26-60). Delayed consolidation occurred in 2 patients and healed after ILN dynamization or nail exchange with grafting. Toe contractures in 2 other patients were resolved with physiotherapy or tenotomy. Until last follow-up (mean 18 months [12-30]) no true complications were encountered, knee motion remained unaffected, and full osseous consolidation occurred in all patients. Interpretation - In patients with LLD and preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion distal tibial lengthening using a retrograde ILN is a reliable alternative to the standard approach with equivalent bone healing potential and low complication rates leaving the knee unaffected.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32835564
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1807222
pmc: PMC8023964
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
761-769Références
J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jan;33(1):31-36
pubmed: 30211787
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Sep 2;97(17):1432-40
pubmed: 26333739
SICOT J. 2017;3:25
pubmed: 28322717
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Oct;82(10):1432-46
pubmed: 11057472
Unfallchirurg. 2018 Nov;121(11):860-867
pubmed: 30203390
Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Nov;33(11):947-55
pubmed: 23131440
J Orthop Sci. 2003;8(1):20-5
pubmed: 12560881
Arch Trauma Res. 2016 Aug 23;5(4):e36273
pubmed: 28144605
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Nov;102(7):851-855
pubmed: 27527249
Injury. 2020 Apr;51(4):1091-1096
pubmed: 32164952
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):3869-78
pubmed: 24682741
Injury. 2001 Dec;32 Suppl 4:SD129-39
pubmed: 11812486
Acta Orthop. 2019 Feb;90(1):81-87
pubmed: 30371122
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Oct;39(9):458-465
pubmed: 31503231
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Oct;470(10):2864-73
pubmed: 22777590
Injury. 2020 Jun;51(6):1377-1381
pubmed: 32327237
Bone Joint J. 2016 Oct;98-B(10):1382-1388
pubmed: 27694593
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020 Nov;29(6):611-617
pubmed: 31904740
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8032510
pubmed: 29130046
SICOT J. 2017;3:19
pubmed: 29785927
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Feb;87(2):302-9
pubmed: 15687151
HSS J. 2008 Feb;4(1):32-42
pubmed: 18751860
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Jan;(250):81-104
pubmed: 2403498
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jul 30;14(1):244
pubmed: 31362774
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Apr;(337):281-90
pubmed: 9137201
Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Oct;29(10):1001-8
pubmed: 18851816
Acta Orthop. 2014 Jun;85(3):293-8
pubmed: 24758320
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):3860-8
pubmed: 24664194
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Oct;(343):135-43
pubmed: 9345218
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Apr;470(4):1221-31
pubmed: 22143986
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Apr 1;26(7):241-250
pubmed: 29494464
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Apr;36(4):400-7
pubmed: 25358806