Replacing dietary antibiotics with 0.20% l-glutamine and synbiotics following weaning and transport in pigs.


Journal

Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 24 06 2020
accepted: 19 08 2020
pubmed: 26 8 2020
medline: 22 12 2020
entrez: 26 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Dietary antibiotic use has been limited in swine production due to concerns regarding antibiotic resistance. However, this may negatively impact the health, productivity, and welfare of pigs. Therefore, the study objective was to determine if combining dietary synbiotics and 0.20% l-glutamine would improve pig growth performance and intestinal health following weaning and transport when compared with traditionally used dietary antibiotics. Because previous research indicates that l-glutamine improves swine growth performance and synbiotics reduce enterogenic bacteria, it was hypothesized that supplementing diets with 0.20% l-glutamine (GLN) and synbiotics (SYN; 3 strains of Lactobacillus [1.2 × 10^9 cfu/g of strain/pig/d] + β-glucan [0.01 g/pig/d] + fructooligosaccharide [0.01 g/pig/d]) would have an additive effect and improve pig performance and intestinal health over that of dietary antibiotics. Mixed-sex pigs (N = 226; 5.86 ± 0.11 kg body weight [BW]) were weaned (19.4 ± 0.2 d of age) and transported for 12 h in central Indiana. Pigs were blocked by BW and allotted to one of two dietary treatments (5 to 6 pigs per pen): antibiotics (positive control [PC]; chlortetracycline [441 ppm] + tiamulin [38.5 ppm]), no antibiotics (negative control [NC]), GLN, SYN, or the NC diet with both the GLN and SYN additives (GLN + SYN) fed for 14 d. From day 14 post-weaning to the end of the grow-finish period, all pigs were provided common antibiotic-free diets. Data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX and PROC MIXED in SAS 9.4. Overall, haptoglobin was greater (P = 0.03; 216%) in NC pigs compared with PC pigs. On day 13, GLN and PC pigs tended to have reduced (P = 0.07; 75.2% and 67.3%, respectively) haptoglobin compared with NC pigs. On day 34, the jejunal goblet cell count per villi and per millimeter tended to be greater (P < 0.08; 71.4% and 62.9%, respectively) in SYN pigs compared with all other dietary treatments. Overall, jejunal mucosa tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) gene expression tended to be greater (P = 0.09; 40.0%) in NC pigs compared with PC pigs on day 34. On day 34, jejunal mucosa TNFα gene expression tended to be greater (P = 0.09; 33.3%, 41.2%, and 60.0%, respectively) in GLN pigs compared with SYN, GLN + SYN, and PC pigs. Although it was determined that some metrics of pig health were improved by the addition of GLN and SYN (i.e., haptoglobin and goblet cell count), overall, there were very few differences detected between dietary treatments and this may be related to the stress load incurred by the pigs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32841327
pii: 5897049
doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa272
pmc: PMC7507408
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Bacterial Agents 0
Glutamine 0RH81L854J

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science 2020.

Références

J Nutr. 2001 May;131(5):1520-7
pubmed: 11340110
Animal. 2010 Sep;4(9):1561-7
pubmed: 22444704
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010 Mar;298(3):G352-63
pubmed: 19926814
J Anim Sci. 2013 Mar;91(3):1094-101
pubmed: 23230104
Nutr Rev. 1990 Aug;48(8):297-309
pubmed: 2080048
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011 Dec;8(12):1269-74
pubmed: 21854261
Am J Physiol. 1999 Apr;276(4):G941-50
pubmed: 10198338
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Dec;76(24):8192-200
pubmed: 20952649
Arch Anim Nutr. 2010 Aug;64(4):304-21
pubmed: 20722301
Vet Res Commun. 1986 Nov;10(6):469-78
pubmed: 3541366
J Anim Sci. 1993 Apr;71(4):888-96
pubmed: 8478291
J Anim Sci. 1986 Apr;62(4):871-4
pubmed: 3710927
J Anim Sci. 2009 Aug;87(8):2614-24
pubmed: 19395514
J Nutr. 1996 Oct;126(10):2578-84
pubmed: 8857520
J Anim Sci. 2017 Jan;95(1):91-102
pubmed: 28177383
J Nutr. 2001 Sep;131(9 Suppl):2525S-31S; discussion 2532S-4S
pubmed: 11533306
Anim Biotechnol. 2002 May;13(1):7-27
pubmed: 12212945
Eur J Biochem. 2000 Mar;267(6):1878-85
pubmed: 10712621
J Anim Sci. 2014 Nov;92(11):4927-34
pubmed: 25253813
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2010;13(3):237-49
pubmed: 20563904
Anim Nutr. 2015 Sep;1(3):166-169
pubmed: 29767165
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007 Aug;293(2):G413-21
pubmed: 17525151
J Anim Sci. 2009 Dec;87(12):4050-6
pubmed: 19717785
J Nutr. 2004 Mar;134(3):641-7
pubmed: 14988461
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013 Jan 07;4(1):1
pubmed: 23289727
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Jan;76(1):48-53
pubmed: 19854929
Poult Sci. 2009 Sep;88(9):1906-14
pubmed: 19687276
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011 May;8(5):623-30
pubmed: 21254892
Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1997 Sep;44(7):405-13
pubmed: 9323928
Arch Anim Nutr. 2005 Dec;59(6):419-27
pubmed: 16429827
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007 Jan;292(1):G315-22
pubmed: 16973917
Can J Vet Res. 2008;72(2):143-50
pubmed: 18505203
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2012 Nov;25(11):1617-26
pubmed: 25049525
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 May 15;120(10):1249-59
pubmed: 26893031
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1986 Jul 16;138(1):318-22
pubmed: 3741415
J Nutr. 2015 Jan;145(1):25-31
pubmed: 25527658
Biochem Soc Symp. 1987;54:145-62
pubmed: 3332991
J Anim Sci. 1998 Apr;76(4):1216-31
pubmed: 9581947
Nutr Res Rev. 2002 Dec;15(2):333-71
pubmed: 19087411
Br J Nutr. 1998 Oct;80(4):S197-202
pubmed: 9924284
Anim Nutr. 2017 Sep;3(3):205-211
pubmed: 29767154
Biometrics. 1997 Sep;53(3):983-97
pubmed: 9333350
J Anim Sci. 2019 Apr 29;97(5):2035-2052
pubmed: 30924491
Am J Physiol. 1995 Feb;268(2 Pt 2):R334-42
pubmed: 7864226
J Anim Sci. 2005 Mar;83(3):634-43
pubmed: 15705760
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2010 Oct;12(5):319-30
pubmed: 20703838
J Anim Sci. 2012 Aug;90(8):2599-608
pubmed: 22344321
Dev Comp Immunol. 2006;30(12):1191-202
pubmed: 16697041
Front Microbiol. 2014 May 13;5:217
pubmed: 24860564

Auteurs

Betty R McConn (BR)

Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN.

Alan W Duttlinger (AW)

Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

Kouassi R Kpodo (KR)

Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

Susan D Eicher (SD)

Livestock Behavior Research Unit, USDA-ARS, West Lafayette, IN.

Brian T Richert (BT)

Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

Jay S Johnson (JS)

Livestock Behavior Research Unit, USDA-ARS, West Lafayette, IN.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult

Classifications MeSH