A novel two-step, direct-to-PCR method for virus detection off swabs using human coronavirus 229E.
Coronavirus
PCR
Viral diagnostics
Virus detection
Journal
Virology journal
ISSN: 1743-422X
Titre abrégé: Virol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101231645
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 08 2020
25 08 2020
Historique:
received:
03
07
2020
accepted:
18
08
2020
entrez:
27
8
2020
pubmed:
28
8
2020
medline:
17
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Currently, one of the most reliable methods for viral infection detection are polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based assays. This process is time and resource heavy, requiring multiple steps of lysis, extraction, purification, and amplification procedures. Herein, we have developed a method to detect virus off swabs using solely shaker-mill based mechanical lysis and the transfer of the viral lysate directly to a PCR assay for virus detection, bypassing the substantial reagent and time investments required for extraction and purification steps. Using Human Coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E) as a model system, we spiked swabs in vitro for proof-of-concept testing. Swabs were spiked in serial dilutions from 1.2 × 10 HCoV-229E in vitro spiked swabs were processed in a novel two-step, direct-to-PCR methodology for viral detection. After running 54 swabs, we confidently determined our limit of detection to be 1.2 × 10 We have proven that the shaker-mill homogenization-based two-step, direct-to-PCR procedures provides sufficient viral lysis off swabs, where the resulting lysate can be used directly in PCR for the detection of HCoV-229E. This finding allows for reductions in the time and resources required for PCR based virus detection in comparison to the traditional extraction-to-PCR methodology.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Currently, one of the most reliable methods for viral infection detection are polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based assays. This process is time and resource heavy, requiring multiple steps of lysis, extraction, purification, and amplification procedures. Herein, we have developed a method to detect virus off swabs using solely shaker-mill based mechanical lysis and the transfer of the viral lysate directly to a PCR assay for virus detection, bypassing the substantial reagent and time investments required for extraction and purification steps.
METHODS
Using Human Coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E) as a model system, we spiked swabs in vitro for proof-of-concept testing. Swabs were spiked in serial dilutions from 1.2 × 10
RESULTS
HCoV-229E in vitro spiked swabs were processed in a novel two-step, direct-to-PCR methodology for viral detection. After running 54 swabs, we confidently determined our limit of detection to be 1.2 × 10
CONCLUSION
We have proven that the shaker-mill homogenization-based two-step, direct-to-PCR procedures provides sufficient viral lysis off swabs, where the resulting lysate can be used directly in PCR for the detection of HCoV-229E. This finding allows for reductions in the time and resources required for PCR based virus detection in comparison to the traditional extraction-to-PCR methodology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32843049
doi: 10.1186/s12985-020-01405-y
pii: 10.1186/s12985-020-01405-y
pmc: PMC7445803
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
129Références
J Appl Lab Med. 2020 Jun 01;:
pubmed: 32483586
Malays J Pathol. 2020 Apr;42(1):3-11
pubmed: 32342926
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2015;68(2):138-41
pubmed: 25420656
Papillomavirus Res. 2017 Dec;4:45-53
pubmed: 29179869
EMBO J. 2019 Aug 15;38(16):e101650
pubmed: 31313835
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Apr 18;21(8):
pubmed: 32325642
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104469
pubmed: 32474371
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;97:66-68
pubmed: 32492531
J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Sep;34(9):1574-1584
pubmed: 31269294
Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2020 Jun;57(1):ecpmc105
pubmed: 32475066
Cell Host Microbe. 2019 Aug 14;26(2):273-282.e7
pubmed: 31378678
J Virol. 1995 Jul;69(7):4331-8
pubmed: 7769694
Euro Surveill. 2020 Apr;25(14):
pubmed: 32290902
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 16;8(1):1558
pubmed: 29146960
Adv Virus Res. 2018;100:163-188
pubmed: 29551135
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;20(4):411-412
pubmed: 32105638
Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 May 27;:102551
pubmed: 32487335
J Virol Methods. 2001 Sep;97(1-2):59-66
pubmed: 11483217
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8):
pubmed: 32471894
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Apr 24;21(8):
pubmed: 32344568