What we talk about when we talk about medical librarianship: an analysis of Medical Library Association annual meeting abstracts, 2001-2019.
Journal
Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
ISSN: 1558-9439
Titre abrégé: J Med Libr Assoc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101132728
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2020
01 Jul 2020
Historique:
entrez:
27
8
2020
pubmed:
28
8
2020
medline:
28
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study seeks to gain initial insight into what is talked about and whose voices are heard at Medical Library Association (MLA) annual meetings. Meeting abstracts were downloaded from the MLA website and converted to comma-separated values (CSV) format. Descriptive analysis in Python identified the number of presentations, disambiguated authors, author collaboration, institutional affiliation type, and geographic affiliation. Topics were generated using Mallet's Latent Dirichlet Allocation algorithm for topic modeling. There were 5,781 presentations at MLA annual meetings from 2001-2019. Author disambiguation resulted in approximately 5,680 unique authors. One thousand ninety-three records included a hospital-related keyword in the author field, and 4,517 records included an academic-related keyword. There were 438 presentations with at least 1 international author. The topic model identified 16 topics in the MLA abstract corpus: events, electronic resources, publications, evidence-based practice, collections, academic instruction, librarian roles and relationships, technical systems, special collections, general instruction, literature searching, surveys, research support, community outreach, patient education, and library services. Academic librarians presented more frequently than hospital librarians, though more research should be done to determine if this discrepancy was disproportionate to hospital librarians' representation in MLA. Geographic affiliation was concentrated in the United States and appeared to be related to population density. Health sciences librarians in the early twenty-first century are spending more time at MLA annual meetings talking about communities, relationships, and visible services, and less time talking about library collections and operations. Further research will be needed to boost the participation of underrepresented members.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32843868
doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.836
pii: jmla.2020.836
pmc: PMC7441905
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
364-377Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Bethany Myers.
Références
J Med Libr Assoc. 2012 Jan;100(1):10-9
pubmed: 22272154
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Apr;107(2):129-136
pubmed: 31019381
J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Jan;101(1):12-20
pubmed: 23405042
J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jul;97(3):203-11
pubmed: 19626146
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Apr;104(2):166-73
pubmed: 27076808
J Prof Nurs. 2005 Nov-Dec;21(6):380-7
pubmed: 16311234
J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Jan;101(1):38-46
pubmed: 23418404
Med Ref Serv Q. 2005 Winter;24(4):1-16
pubmed: 16203698
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Apr;106(2):162-174
pubmed: 29632439
Med Ref Serv Q. 1996 Winter;15(4):63-71
pubmed: 10164470