Nup133 and ERα mediate the differential effects of hyperoxia-induced damage in male and female OPCs.
Hyperoxia
Preterm brain
Sex difference
Steroid hormones
White matter damage
Journal
Molecular and cellular pediatrics
ISSN: 2194-7791
Titre abrégé: Mol Cell Pediatr
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101660689
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Aug 2020
25 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
16
04
2020
accepted:
02
08
2020
entrez:
27
8
2020
pubmed:
28
8
2020
medline:
28
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hyperoxia is a well-known cause of cerebral white matter injury in preterm infants with male sex being an independent and critical risk factor for poor neurodevelopmental outcome. Sex is therefore being widely considered as one of the major decisive factors for prognosis and treatment of these infants. But unfortunately, we still lack a clear view of the molecular mechanisms that lead to such a profound difference. Hence, using mouse-derived primary oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs), we investigated the molecular factors and underlying mechanisms behind the differential response of male and female cells towards oxidative stress. We demonstrate that oxidative stress severely affects cellular functions related to energy metabolism, stress response, and maturation in the male-derived OPCs, whereas the female cells remain largely unaffected. CNPase protein level was found to decline following hyperoxia in male but not in female cells. This impairment of maturation was accompanied by the downregulation of nucleoporin and nuclear lamina proteins in the male cells. We identify Nup133 as a novel target protein affected by hyperoxia, whose inverse regulation may mediate this differential response in the male and female cells. Nup133 protein level declined following hyperoxia in male but not in female cells. We show that nuclear respiratory factor 1 (Nrf1) is a direct downstream target of Nup133 and that Nrf1 mRNA declines following hyperoxia in male but not in female cells. The female cells may be rendered resistant due to synergistic protection via the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) which was upregulated following hyperoxia in female but not in male cells. Both Nup133 and ERα regulate mitochondrial function and oxidative stress response by transcriptional regulation of Nrf1. These findings from a basic cell culture model establish prominent sex-based differences and suggest a novel mechanism involved in the differential response of OPCs towards oxidative stress. It conveys a strong message supporting the need to study how complex cellular processes are regulated differently in male and female brains during development and for a better understanding of how the brain copes up with different forms of stress after preterm birth.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Hyperoxia is a well-known cause of cerebral white matter injury in preterm infants with male sex being an independent and critical risk factor for poor neurodevelopmental outcome. Sex is therefore being widely considered as one of the major decisive factors for prognosis and treatment of these infants. But unfortunately, we still lack a clear view of the molecular mechanisms that lead to such a profound difference. Hence, using mouse-derived primary oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs), we investigated the molecular factors and underlying mechanisms behind the differential response of male and female cells towards oxidative stress.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We demonstrate that oxidative stress severely affects cellular functions related to energy metabolism, stress response, and maturation in the male-derived OPCs, whereas the female cells remain largely unaffected. CNPase protein level was found to decline following hyperoxia in male but not in female cells. This impairment of maturation was accompanied by the downregulation of nucleoporin and nuclear lamina proteins in the male cells. We identify Nup133 as a novel target protein affected by hyperoxia, whose inverse regulation may mediate this differential response in the male and female cells. Nup133 protein level declined following hyperoxia in male but not in female cells. We show that nuclear respiratory factor 1 (Nrf1) is a direct downstream target of Nup133 and that Nrf1 mRNA declines following hyperoxia in male but not in female cells. The female cells may be rendered resistant due to synergistic protection via the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) which was upregulated following hyperoxia in female but not in male cells. Both Nup133 and ERα regulate mitochondrial function and oxidative stress response by transcriptional regulation of Nrf1.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
These findings from a basic cell culture model establish prominent sex-based differences and suggest a novel mechanism involved in the differential response of OPCs towards oxidative stress. It conveys a strong message supporting the need to study how complex cellular processes are regulated differently in male and female brains during development and for a better understanding of how the brain copes up with different forms of stress after preterm birth.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32844334
doi: 10.1186/s40348-020-00102-8
pii: 10.1186/s40348-020-00102-8
pmc: PMC7447710
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
10Références
BMJ. 2015 Jan 20;350:g6661
pubmed: 25646630
Nat Protoc. 2011 Jul 28;6(8):1229-40
pubmed: 21799491
Acta Paediatr. 2006 Oct;95(10):1239-48
pubmed: 16982497
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Dec;15(12):1621-3
pubmed: 23143512
Front Genet. 2015 Mar 19;6:95
pubmed: 25852741
Endocrinology. 1997 Mar;138(3):863-70
pubmed: 9048584
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Nov 21;17:596-606
pubmed: 29234596
Pediatrics. 2001 Nov;108(5):1203-5
pubmed: 11694702
Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;454:7-16
pubmed: 9889871
Science. 2011 Dec 23;334(6063):1706-10
pubmed: 22116031
J Neurosci. 2002 Jan 15;22(2):455-63
pubmed: 11784790
Lancet. 2012 Jun 9;379(9832):2151-61
pubmed: 22579125
J Trop Pediatr. 2013 Aug;59(4):258-65
pubmed: 23486391
Brain Pathol. 2008 Apr;18(2):153-63
pubmed: 18177464
Cell. 2007 Feb 23;128(4):693-705
pubmed: 17320507
Int J Dev Neurosci. 2011 Oct;29(6):565-82
pubmed: 21802506
J Neurosci. 2006 Feb 1;26(5):1439-47
pubmed: 16452667
Ann Neurol. 2005 Jan;57(1):50-9
pubmed: 15622543
Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Aug;20(15):5631-42
pubmed: 10891500
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Dec 13;17(12):
pubmed: 27983596
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;3(2):147-66
pubmed: 21305702
Dev Cell. 2008 Jun;14(6):831-42
pubmed: 18539113
Neurobiol Dis. 2004 Nov;17(2):273-82
pubmed: 15474364
J Mol Endocrinol. 2013 Sep 10;51(2):233-46
pubmed: 23892277
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2011 Jun;23(3):346-53
pubmed: 21242077
J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2017 Aug;49(4):307-324
pubmed: 28401437
Cell Death Differ. 2011 Jun;18(6):1016-23
pubmed: 21274009
BJOG. 2003 Apr;110 Suppl 20:34-8
pubmed: 12763109
Pediatr Res. 2018 Dec;84(6):799-806
pubmed: 30315272
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2013 Jun;2(6):464-72
pubmed: 23677643
J Neurosci Res. 1996 Jul 15;45(2):161-73
pubmed: 8843033
Dev Neurosci. 2016;38(5):311-330
pubmed: 28152539
J Cell Sci. 2011 May 1;124(Pt 9):1396-402
pubmed: 21486948
Pediatr Res. 2011 Jul;70(1):15-20
pubmed: 21436761
J Neurosci Res. 2006 Aug 1;84(2):306-15
pubmed: 16673399
J Neurosci. 2000 Oct 1;20(19):7377-83
pubmed: 11007896
J Neurosci. 2008 Jan 30;28(5):1236-45
pubmed: 18234901
Genes Dev. 1990 Jun;4(6):1023-34
pubmed: 2166701
Stem Cell Reports. 2013 Oct 31;1(5):437-50
pubmed: 24286031
Glia. 2018 Feb;66(2):221-238
pubmed: 29134703
Pediatr Res. 2009 Sep;66(3):248-53
pubmed: 19542909
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2012 Dec;24(6):775-83
pubmed: 22995343
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002 Feb;61(2):197-211
pubmed: 11853021
Dev Cell. 2012 Feb 14;22(2):446-58
pubmed: 22264802
Semin Neonatol. 2001 Jun;6(3):233-9
pubmed: 11520188
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 17;358(16):1672-81
pubmed: 18420500
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2014 Jun;28:61-8
pubmed: 24694724
Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Jul;8(7):507-17
pubmed: 17549064
Genomics. 1995 Jun 10;27(3):555-7
pubmed: 7558044
Int J Dev Biol. 2005;49(2-3):209-20
pubmed: 15906234