A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sirukumab in the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis.
Clinical trial
Corticosteroid taper
Giant cell arteritis
Interleukin-6
Sirukumab
Journal
Rheumatology and therapy
ISSN: 2198-6576
Titre abrégé: Rheumatol Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101674543
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
10
06
2020
pubmed:
28
8
2020
medline:
28
8
2020
entrez:
27
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirukumab in giant cell arteritis (GCA). In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-part phase 3 trial (NCT02531633; Part A [52-week double-blind treatment]; Part B [104-week follow-up]), patients with GCA were randomised (3:3:2:2:2) to sirukumab 100 mg every 2 weeks plus 6-month or 3-month prednisone taper, sirukumab 50 mg every 4 weeks plus 6-month prednisone taper, or placebo every 2 weeks plus 6-month or 12-month prednisone taper. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in sustained remission at week 52. Secondary endpoints included disease flare and safety. The study was terminated early (October 2017; sponsor decision). Of 161 patients randomised (sirukumab: n = 107; placebo: n = 54), 28 (17.4%) completed week 52 (median treatment duration: 24-30 weeks). In a revised intent-to-treat (ITT) subgroup (completed week 52 or discontinued before study termination [n = 55]); six patients (all receiving sirukumab) achieved the primary endpoint. In the ITT population (n = 161), the proportion of patients with flares (week 2-52) was lower with sirukumab (18.4-30.8%) than placebo (37.0-40.0%). The proportion of patients with flares (week 2-12) was highest with sirukumab 100 mg every 2 weeks plus 3-month prednisone taper (23.1%). In Part A, 94.4% of patients reported ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); 19.3% reported serious TEAEs. The proportions of patients with TEAEs were generally similar across treatment arms. No deaths occurred. Although data were limited due to early termination and shortened treatment duration, sirukumab treatment resulted in numerically lower proportions of patients with flare by week 52 versus placebo, with no unexpected safety findings. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02531633.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32844378
doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00227-2
pii: 10.1007/s40744-020-00227-2
pmc: PMC7695797
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02531633']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
793-810Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N011775/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : GlaxoSmithKline
ID : Study number 201677
Références
Salvarani C, Crowson CS, O'Fallon WM, Hunder GG, Gabriel SE. Reappraisal of the epidemiology of giant cell arteritis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, over a fifty-year period. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:264–8.
doi: 10.1002/art.20227
Stone JH, Tuckwell K, Dimonaco S, et al. Trial of tocilizumab in giant-cell arteritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:317–28.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613849
Dasgupta B, Borg FA, Hassan N, et al. BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology. 2010;49:1594–7.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq039a
Liddle J, Bartlam R, Mallen CD, et al. What is the impact of giant cell arteritis on patients’ lives? A UK qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e017073.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017073
Pineles SL. Giant cell arteritis. 2019. https://eyewiki.aao.org/Giant_Cell_Arteritis . Accessed 9 Mar 2020.
Villa-Forte A. Giant cell arteritis: suspect it, treat it promptly. Cleve Clin J Med. 2011;78:265–70.
doi: 10.3949/ccjm.78a.10131
Amiri N, De Vera M, Choi HK, Sayre EC, Avina-Zubieta JA. Increased risk of cardiovascular disease in giant cell arteritis: a general population-based study. Rheumatology. 2016;55:33–40.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev262
Hellmich B, Agueda A, Monti S, et al. 2018 Update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:19–30.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215672
Docken WP. Treatment of giant cell arteritis. 2019. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-of-giant-cell-arteritis/print . Accessed 1 July 2019.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Giant cell arteritis. 2014. https://www.cks.nice.org.uk/giant-cell-arteritis#!scenario . [Accessed 3 June 2019].
Hachulla E, Boivin V, Pasturel-Michon U, et al. Prognostic factors and long-term evolution in a cohort of 133 patients with giant cell arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2001;19:171–6.
pubmed: 11326479
Alba MA, García-Martínez A, Prieto-González S, et al. Relapses in patients with giant cell arteritis: prevalence, characteristics, and associated clinical findings in a longitudinally followed cohort of 106 patients. Medicine. 2014;93:194–201.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000033
Labarca C, Koster MJ, Crowson CS, et al. Predictors of relapse and treatment outcomes in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis: a retrospective cohort study. Rheumatology. 2016;55:347–56.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev348
Mainbourg S, Addario A, Samson M, et al. Prevalence of giant cell arteritis relapse in patients treated with glucocorticoids: a meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res. 2020;72:838–49.
doi: 10.1002/acr.23901
Meskimen S, Cook TD, Blake RL Jr. Management of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61(2061–8):73.
Fraser JA, Weyand CM, Newman NJ, Biousse V. The treatment of giant cell arteritis. Rev Neurol Dis. 2008;5:140–52.
pubmed: 18838954
pmcid: 3014829
Proven A, Gabriel SE, Orces C, O'Fallon WM, Hunder GG. Glucocorticoid therapy in giant cell arteritis: duration and adverse outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:703–8.
doi: 10.1002/art.11388
Low C, Conway R. Current advances in the treatment of giant cell arteritis: the role of biologics. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2019;11:1759720X19827222.
doi: 10.1177/1759720X19827222
Chandran A, Udayakumar PD, Kermani TA, Warrington KJ, Crowson CS, Matteson EL. Glucocorticoid usage in giant cell arteritis over six decades (1950 to 2009). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015;33:S-98–S-102.
Evans J, Steel L, Borg F, Dasgupta B. Long-term efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis and large vessel vasculitis. RMD Open. 2016;2:e000137.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000137
Terrades-Garcia N, Cid MC. Pathogenesis of giant-cell arteritis: how targeted therapies are influencing our understanding of the mechanisms involved. Rheumatology. 2018;57:ii51–ii62.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex423
Dasgupta B, Panayi GS. Interleukin-6 in serum of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1990;29:456–8.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/29.6.456
Unizony S, Kermani TA. IL-6 blockade and its therapeutic success in giant cell arteritis. J Neuroophthalmol. 2018;38:551–8.
doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000713
Hernandez-Rodriguez J, Segarra M, Vilardell C, et al. Tissue production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1beta, TNFalpha and IL-6) correlates with the intensity of the systemic inflammatory response and with corticosteroid requirements in giant-cell arteritis. Rheumatology. 2004;43:294–301.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh058
Emilie D, Liozon E, Crevon MC, et al. Production of interleukin 6 by granulomas of giant cell arteritis. Hum Immunol. 1994;39:17–24.
doi: 10.1016/0198-8859(94)90096-5
van der Geest KS, Abdulahad WH, Rutgers A, et al. Serum markers associated with disease activity in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. Rheumatology. 2015;54:1397–402.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu526
Garcia-Martinez A, Hernandez-Rodriguez J, Espigol-Frigole G, et al. Clinical relevance of persistently elevated circulating cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-6) in the long-term follow-up of patients with giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62:835–41.
doi: 10.1002/acr.20043
Miyabe C, Miyabe Y, Strle K, et al. An expanded population of pathogenic regulatory T cells in giant cell arteritis is abrogated by IL-6 blockade therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:898–905.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210070
Stone JH, Tuckwell K, Dimonaco S, et al. Glucocorticoid doses and acute-phase reactants at giant cell arteritis flare in a randomized trial of tocilizumab. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:1329–38.
doi: 10.1002/art.40876
Xu Z, Bouman-Thio E, Comisar C, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of a human anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody (sirukumab) in healthy subjects in a first-in-human study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;72:270–81.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03964.x
Takeuchi T, Thorne C, Karpouzas G, et al. Sirukumab for rheumatoid arthritis: the phase III SIRROUND-D study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:2001–8.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211328
Aletaha D, Bingham CO 3rd, Tanaka Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of sirukumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-TNF therapy (SIRROUND-T): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2017;389:1206–17.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30401-4
International Council for Harmoisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). ICH E6 good clinical practice. 2016. https://www.ich.org/page/efficacy-guidelines . Accessed 9 Mar 2020.
National Institutes for Health (NIH) National Cancer Institute. National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE v4.03). 2010. https://www.ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm#ctc_40 . Accessed 9 Mar 2020.
Calderon-Goercke M, Loricera J, Aldasoro V, et al. Tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis. Observational, open-label multicenter study of 134 patients in clinical practice. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;49(1):126–35.
doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.003
Thorne C, Takeuchi T, Karpouzas GA, et al. Investigating sirukumab for rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year results from the phase III SIRROUND-D study. RMD Open. 2018;4:e000731.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000731
Taylor PC, Schiff MH, Wang Q, et al. Efficacy and safety of monotherapy with sirukumab compared with adalimumab monotherapy in biologic-naive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (SIRROUND-H): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multinational, 52-week, phase 3 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:658–66.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212496
Villiger PM, Adler S, Kuchen S, et al. Tocilizumab for induction and maintenance of remission in giant cell arteritis: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1921–7.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00560-2
Jagpal A, Curtis JR. Gastrointestinal perforations with biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: implications for clinicians. Drug Saf. 2018;41:545–53.
doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0639-1
Samson M, Devilliers H, Ly KH, et al. Tocilizumab as an add-on therapy to glucocorticoids during the first 3 months of treatment of giant cell arteritis: a prospective study. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;57:96–104.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.06.008
Schmidt WA, Hofheinz K, Burger S, Schafer VS, Juche A. Eligibility of patients with giant cell arteritis for entry into a prospective randomised controlled trial: A single-centre experience. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(Suppl):A1496.
Rothwell PM. Factors that can affect the external validity of randomised controlled trials. PLoS Clin Trials. 2006;1:e9.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010009
Murad MH, Katabi A, Benkhadra R, Montori VM. External validity, generalisability, applicability and directness: a brief primer. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23:17–9.
doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110800