Overcoming resistance to STING agonist therapy to incite durable protective antitumor immunity.


Journal

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
accepted: 23 07 2020
entrez: 28 8 2020
pubmed: 28 8 2020
medline: 16 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Activating the Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) adaptor incites antitumor immunity against immunogenic tumors in mice, prompting clinical trials to test STING activators. However, STING signaling in the tumor microenvironment (TME) during development of Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) suppresses antitumor immunity to promote tumor growth. We hypothesized that local immune balance favoring suppression of antitumor immunity also attenuates antitumor responses following STING activation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how STING activation impacts antitumor responses in mice bearing LLC tumors. Mice bearing established LLC tumors were treated with synthetic cyclic diadenyl monophosphate (CDA) to activate STING. Mice were monitored to assess LLC tumor growth, survival and protective antitumor immunity. Transcriptional and metabolic analyses were used to identify pathways responsive to CDA, and mice were co-treated with CDA and drugs that disrupt these pathways. CDA slowed LLC tumor growth but most CDA-treated mice (77%) succumbed to tumor growth. No evidence of tumor relapse was found in surviving CDA-treated mice at experimental end points but mice were not immune to LLC challenge. CDA induced rapid increase in immune regulatory pathways involving programmed death-1 (PD-1), indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) in the TME. PD-1 blockade enhanced antitumor responses to CDA and increased mouse survival but mice did not eliminate primary tumor burdens. Two IDO inhibitor drugs had little or no beneficial effects on antitumor responses to CDA. A third IDO inhibitor drug synergized with CDA to enhance tumor control and survival but mice did not eliminate primary tumor burdens. In contrast, co-treatments with CDA and the COX2-selective inhibitor celecoxib controlled tumor growth, leading to uniform survival without relapse, and mice acquired resistance to LLC re-challenge and growth of distal tumors not exposed directly to CDA. Thus, mice co-treated with CDA and celecoxib acquired stable and systemic antitumor immunity. STING activation incites potent antitumor responses and boosts local immune regulation to attenuate antitumor responses. Blocking STING-responsive regulatory pathways synergizes with CDA to enhance antitumor responses, particularly COX2 inhibition. Thus, therapy-induced resistance to STING may necessitate co-treatments to disrupt regulatory pathways responsive to STING in patients with cancer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Activating the Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) adaptor incites antitumor immunity against immunogenic tumors in mice, prompting clinical trials to test STING activators. However, STING signaling in the tumor microenvironment (TME) during development of Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) suppresses antitumor immunity to promote tumor growth. We hypothesized that local immune balance favoring suppression of antitumor immunity also attenuates antitumor responses following STING activation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how STING activation impacts antitumor responses in mice bearing LLC tumors.
METHODS
Mice bearing established LLC tumors were treated with synthetic cyclic diadenyl monophosphate (CDA) to activate STING. Mice were monitored to assess LLC tumor growth, survival and protective antitumor immunity. Transcriptional and metabolic analyses were used to identify pathways responsive to CDA, and mice were co-treated with CDA and drugs that disrupt these pathways.
RESULTS
CDA slowed LLC tumor growth but most CDA-treated mice (77%) succumbed to tumor growth. No evidence of tumor relapse was found in surviving CDA-treated mice at experimental end points but mice were not immune to LLC challenge. CDA induced rapid increase in immune regulatory pathways involving programmed death-1 (PD-1), indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) in the TME. PD-1 blockade enhanced antitumor responses to CDA and increased mouse survival but mice did not eliminate primary tumor burdens. Two IDO inhibitor drugs had little or no beneficial effects on antitumor responses to CDA. A third IDO inhibitor drug synergized with CDA to enhance tumor control and survival but mice did not eliminate primary tumor burdens. In contrast, co-treatments with CDA and the COX2-selective inhibitor celecoxib controlled tumor growth, leading to uniform survival without relapse, and mice acquired resistance to LLC re-challenge and growth of distal tumors not exposed directly to CDA. Thus, mice co-treated with CDA and celecoxib acquired stable and systemic antitumor immunity.
CONCLUSIONS
STING activation incites potent antitumor responses and boosts local immune regulation to attenuate antitumor responses. Blocking STING-responsive regulatory pathways synergizes with CDA to enhance antitumor responses, particularly COX2 inhibition. Thus, therapy-induced resistance to STING may necessitate co-treatments to disrupt regulatory pathways responsive to STING in patients with cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32847988
pii: jitc-2020-001182
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001182
pmc: PMC7451475
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Membrane Proteins 0
STING1 protein, human 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : A20970
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: AM holds shares in NewLink Genetics (now Lumos Pharma) and has received licensing income from this source.

Références

Nat Rev Cancer. 2019 Mar;19(3):162-175
pubmed: 30696923
Cancer Res. 2005 Dec 15;65(24):11752-61
pubmed: 16357188
Front Immunol. 2020 Jun 17;11:1256
pubmed: 32625215
Nature. 2018 Dec;564(7736):439-443
pubmed: 30405246
J Immunother. 2009 Jan;32(1):22-8
pubmed: 19307990
Subcell Biochem. 2007;42:93-126
pubmed: 17612047
Life Sci Alliance. 2019 May 27;2(3):
pubmed: 31133614
Semin Immunopathol. 2019 Jan;41(1):41-48
pubmed: 30203227
J Immunol. 2013 Oct 1;191(7):3509-13
pubmed: 23986532
Cancer Res. 2018 Feb 1;78(3):809-816
pubmed: 29118088
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 25;10(1):4346
pubmed: 31554815
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 31;114(5):1117-1122
pubmed: 28096371
Cancer Discov. 2018 Jul;8(7):OF5
pubmed: 29848606
Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Feb;194:84-106
pubmed: 30268773
Cell Rep. 2015 Oct 13;13(2):412-24
pubmed: 26411680
Trends Immunol. 2016 Mar;37(3):193-207
pubmed: 26839260
Cell Rep. 2015 May 19;11(7):1018-30
pubmed: 25959818
Front Oncol. 2019 May 07;9:363
pubmed: 31134158
Cancer Immunol Res. 2017 Sep;5(9):767-777
pubmed: 28819064
Cancer Res. 2016 Apr 15;76(8):2076-81
pubmed: 26964621
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):93-97
pubmed: 28662235
Immunology. 2019 Dec;158(4):353-361
pubmed: 31557322
J Immunol. 2012 May 15;188(10):4913-20
pubmed: 22516958
Cell. 2015 Apr 9;161(2):205-14
pubmed: 25860605
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2018 Sep;37(2-3):347-354
pubmed: 29926309
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jan 1;26(1):282-289
pubmed: 31471311
Nature. 2009 Oct 8;461(7265):788-92
pubmed: 19776740
Carcinogenesis. 2011 Sep;32(9):1333-9
pubmed: 21730361
Annu Rev Immunol. 2015;33:445-74
pubmed: 25622193
Molecules. 2013 Aug 22;18(9):10132-45
pubmed: 23973990
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 12;6:19049
pubmed: 26754564
J Exp Med. 2013 Jul 1;210(7):1389-402
pubmed: 23752227
J Transl Med. 2018 Aug 6;16(1):219
pubmed: 30081936
J Immunol. 2014 Jun 15;192(12):5571-8
pubmed: 24799564
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):56-61
pubmed: 25838373
Cell. 2015 Sep 10;162(6):1257-70
pubmed: 26343581
Int J Cancer. 2002 Sep 10;101(2):151-5
pubmed: 12209992

Auteurs

Henrique Lemos (H)

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.

Rong Ou (R)

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.

Caroline McCardle (C)

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.

Yijun Lin (Y)

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.

Jessica Calver (J)

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.

Jack Minett (J)

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.

Ahmed Chadli (A)

Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

Lei Huang (L)

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK andrew.mellor@ncl.ac.uk lei.huang@ncl.ac.uk.

Andrew L Mellor (AL)

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK andrew.mellor@ncl.ac.uk lei.huang@ncl.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH