Punishment Feedback Impairs Memory and Changes Cortical Feedback-Related Potentials During Motor Learning.
EEG
cortical potentials
motor learning
motor retention
reinforcement feedback
Journal
Frontiers in human neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Titre abrégé: Front Hum Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477954
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
24
01
2020
accepted:
30
06
2020
entrez:
28
8
2020
pubmed:
28
8
2020
medline:
28
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Reward and punishment have demonstrated dissociable effects on motor learning and memory, which suggests that these reinforcers are differently processed by the brain. To test this possibility, we use electroencephalography to record cortical neural activity after the presentation of reward and punishment feedback during a visuomotor rotation task. Participants were randomly placed into Reward, Punishment, or Control groups and performed the task under different conditions to assess the adaptation (learning) and retention (memory) of the motor task. These conditions featured an incongruent position between the cursor and the target, with the cursor trajectory, rotated 30° counterclockwise, requiring the participant to adapt their movement to hit the target. Feedback based on error magnitude was provided during the Adaptation condition in the form of a positive number (Reward) or negative number (Punishment), each representing a monetary gain or loss, respectively. No reinforcement or visual feedback was provided during the No Vision condition (retention). Performance error and event-related potentials (ERPs) time-locked to feedback presentation were calculated for each participant during both conditions. Punishment feedback reduced performance error and promoted faster learning during the Adaptation condition. In contrast, punishment feedback increased performance error during the No Vision condition compared to Control and Reward groups, which suggests a diminished motor memory. Moreover, the Punishment group showed a significant decrease in the amplitude of ERPs during the No Vision condition compared to the Adaptation condition. The amplitude of ERPs did not change in the other two groups. These results suggest that punishment feedback impairs motor retention by altering the neural processing involved in memory encoding. This study provides a neurophysiological underpinning for the dissociative effects of punishment feedback on motor learning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32848669
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00294
pmc: PMC7419689
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
294Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Hill, Stringer, Waddell and Del Arco.
Références
J Neurosci. 2009 Jan 14;29(2):436-43
pubmed: 19144843
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Jun;19(6):338-350
pubmed: 29643480
J Neurophysiol. 2008 May;99(5):2577-83
pubmed: 18353917
Sci Rep. 2014 Aug 07;4:5986
pubmed: 25100234
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 9;14(8):e0220884
pubmed: 31398227
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Dec;7(12):1370-5
pubmed: 15558064
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Nov 07;6:304
pubmed: 23162451
Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Jul;22(1):235-46
pubmed: 16029213
Science. 2002 Mar 22;295(5563):2279-82
pubmed: 11910116
J Neurosci. 2007 Jan 10;27(2):371-8
pubmed: 17215398
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jun 12;9:335
pubmed: 26124715
J Neurosci. 2015 Apr 1;35(13):5109-17
pubmed: 25834038
Brain Stimul. 2019 Sep - Oct;12(5):1205-1212
pubmed: 31133478
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Jul;43(8):1639-1650
pubmed: 29703994
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2017 Apr;140:124-133
pubmed: 28257877
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Apr 1;121(4):1561-1574
pubmed: 30811259
eNeuro. 2018 Jul 16;5(3):
pubmed: 30027109
Front Psychol. 2011 Nov 16;2:335
pubmed: 22110464
Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 15;37(2):579-88
pubmed: 17604651
Biol Psychol. 2006 Feb;71(2):148-54
pubmed: 16005561
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Mar;7(3):e1002012
pubmed: 21423711
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Apr;18(2):249-262
pubmed: 29380293
J Neurosci. 2014 Apr 2;34(14):4845-56
pubmed: 24695704
Psychophysiology. 2004 Mar;41(2):245-53
pubmed: 15032989
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Aug;21(8):1761-70
pubmed: 21139077
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Apr;20(2):364-71
pubmed: 23065763
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Sep;108(6):1752-63
pubmed: 22773782
J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 5;26(14):3642-5
pubmed: 16597717
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Sep;102(3):1868-79
pubmed: 19605614
Front Neurosci. 2014 May 20;8:108
pubmed: 24904254
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;185(3):359-81
pubmed: 18251019
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Feb;73(2):249-259
pubmed: 31382855
Neurosci Res. 2001 Jan;39(1):39-49
pubmed: 11164252
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Sep;232(9):3007-13
pubmed: 24854018
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Jun 1;119(6):2241-2255
pubmed: 29537918
J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 4;30(31):10507-16
pubmed: 20685993
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Jul;20(7):1596-603
pubmed: 19840974
Curr Biol. 2011 Apr 12;21(7):557-62
pubmed: 21419628
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Oct 1;116(4):1603-1614
pubmed: 27486109
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 14;8(1):9121
pubmed: 29904096
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Apr;18(4):597-602
pubmed: 25706473
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Mar;201(2):191-207
pubmed: 19830412
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Jun;2(6):417-24
pubmed: 11389475
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jan 15;113(2):633-46
pubmed: 25355957
J Neurosci. 2015 Jul 1;35(26):9568-79
pubmed: 26134640
Neuron. 2011 May 26;70(4):787-801
pubmed: 21609832
J Neurosci. 2007 Dec 5;27(49):13413-9
pubmed: 18057199
PLoS Biol. 2006 Jun;4(6):e179
pubmed: 16700627
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 20;9:2285
pubmed: 30515126
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Sep;36(8):1870-84
pubmed: 22683741
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Dec;235(12):3605-3618
pubmed: 28887626
Physiol Rev. 2014 Jan;94(1):35-79
pubmed: 24382883
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 Jul;28(4):441-8
pubmed: 15289008
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
Neuroimage. 2007 Jul 15;36(4):1253-62
pubmed: 17521924
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):58-76
pubmed: 28685272
Psychol Rev. 2002 Oct;109(4):679-709
pubmed: 12374324
Prog Brain Res. 2014;210:217-53
pubmed: 24916295
Compr Physiol. 2019 Mar 14;9(2):613-663
pubmed: 30873583
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 08;6:36633
pubmed: 27824129
J Neurosci. 2004 Jul 14;24(28):6258-64
pubmed: 15254080
Exp Brain Res. 2010 May;203(1):75-87
pubmed: 20237773
J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 17;30(46):15600-7
pubmed: 21084615
Neuroscience. 2016 Nov 19;337:267-275
pubmed: 27646292
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3788-92
pubmed: 20142490
Brain. 2016 Jan;139(Pt 1):101-14
pubmed: 26626368
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 06;6:204
pubmed: 22783182
Trends Neurosci. 2017 Apr;40(4):208-218
pubmed: 28314445
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499