Large-Scale Contractility Measurements Reveal Large Atrioventricular and Subtle Interventricular Differences in Cultured Unloaded Rat Cardiomyocytes.
atria
cardiomyocyte
contractility
large-scale
regional differences
ventricles
Journal
Frontiers in physiology
ISSN: 1664-042X
Titre abrégé: Front Physiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101549006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
20
12
2019
accepted:
18
06
2020
entrez:
28
8
2020
pubmed:
28
8
2020
medline:
28
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The chambers of the heart fulfill different hemodynamic functions, which are reflected in their structural and contractile properties. While the atria are highly elastic to allow filling from the venous system, the ventricles need to be able to produce sufficiently high pressures to eject blood into the circulation. The right ventricle (RV) pumps into the low pressure pulmonary circulation, while the left ventricle (LV) needs to overcome the high pressure of the systemic circulation. It is incompletely understood whether these differences can be explained by the contractile differences at the level of the individual cardiomyocytes of the chambers. We addressed this by isolating cardiomyocytes from atria, RV, LV, and interventricular septum (IVS) of five healthy wild-type rats. Using a high-throughput contractility set-up, we measured contractile function of 2,043 cells after overnight culture. Compared to ventricular cardiomyocytes, atrial cells showed a twofold lower contraction amplitude and 1.4- to 1.7-fold slower kinetics of contraction and relaxation. The interventricular differences in contractile function were much smaller; RV cells displayed 12-13% less fractional shortening and 5-9% slower contraction and 3-15% slower relaxation kinetics relative to their LV and IVS counterparts. Aided by a large dataset, we established relationships between contractile parameters and found contraction velocity, fractional shortening and relaxation velocity to be highly correlated. In conclusion, our findings are in line with contractile differences observed at the atrioventricular level, but can only partly explain the interventricular differences that exist at the organ level.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32848817
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00815
pmc: PMC7396550
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
815Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Nollet, Manders, Goebel, Jansen, Brockmann, Osinga, van der Velden, Helmes and Kuster.
Références
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011 Jun;12(6):421-30
pubmed: 21565866
Pflugers Arch. 2014 Mar;466(3):439-44
pubmed: 24407948
J Physiol. 2006 Feb 15;571(Pt 1):131-46
pubmed: 16357014
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999 Jun;31(6):1299-314
pubmed: 10371704
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019 Jun 1;316(6):H1507-H1527
pubmed: 30875259
Cardiovasc Res. 2016 May 15;110(2):200-14
pubmed: 26825555
J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2013 Aug;34(3-4):199-210
pubmed: 23881156
Pflugers Arch. 2006 Sep;452(6):667-73
pubmed: 16614852
Front Physiol. 2016 Aug 17;7:331
pubmed: 27582709
J Physiol. 2017 Jul 15;595(14):4597-4610
pubmed: 28485491
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016 May;5(1):14-9
pubmed: 27403288
Pflugers Arch. 2011 Dec;462(6):795-809
pubmed: 21927813
Dev Biol. 2006 Jun 15;294(2):366-75
pubmed: 16677630
Cardiovasc Res. 2017 Dec 1;113(14):1743-1752
pubmed: 29016722
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2009 Apr;46(4):463-73
pubmed: 19059414
Proteomics. 2011 Jun;11(11):2320-8
pubmed: 21598388
J Physiol. 2015 Sep 1;593(17):3899-916
pubmed: 26096258
J Physiol. 2007 Jul 15;582(Pt 2):675-93
pubmed: 17478540
Dev Cell. 2003 Dec;5(6):877-89
pubmed: 14667410
Cardiovasc Res. 1998 Aug;39(2):280-300
pubmed: 9798514
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006 Jul;291(1):H88-96
pubmed: 16461368
J Physiol. 2019 Sep;597(17):4521-4531
pubmed: 31314138
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2019 Sep 04;4(5):575-591
pubmed: 31768475
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2004 Aug;5(4):262-71
pubmed: 15219541
J Physiol. 2019 Feb;597(3):665-666
pubmed: 30570762
Physiol Rep. 2013 Nov;1(6):e00158
pubmed: 24400159
Am J Physiol. 1998 Mar;274(3):H1048-53
pubmed: 9530220
J Clin Invest. 2014 Nov;124(11):4759-72
pubmed: 25329692
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016 Jul;1863(7 Pt B):1882-93
pubmed: 26620800
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1988 Jul;20(7):635-47
pubmed: 3172250
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012 Jan;52(1):113-24
pubmed: 21930133
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013 Apr 1;304(7):H946-53
pubmed: 23355341
Pflugers Arch. 2014 Feb;466(2):201-6
pubmed: 24240729
Pflugers Arch. 2014 Jun;466(6):1055-63
pubmed: 24488007
J Physiol. 2019 Feb;597(3):711-722
pubmed: 30315728
Am J Physiol. 1997 Nov;273(5):H2498-507
pubmed: 9374790
Circulation. 1990 Oct;82(4):1316-24
pubmed: 2401065
Circulation. 2006 Oct 24;114(17):1883-91
pubmed: 17060398
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Apr 13;374(2065):20150202
pubmed: 26953178
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015 Oct;87:102-12
pubmed: 26268593
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010 Oct;299(4):H1092-9
pubmed: 20656885
Proteomics. 2012 Aug;12(14):2366-77
pubmed: 22685060
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2005;7(5):775-82
pubmed: 16353438
Pflugers Arch. 2011 Jul;462(1):15-28
pubmed: 21336586
Br Heart J. 1995 Aug;74(2):186-91
pubmed: 7547000
Jpn J Physiol. 2005 Apr;55(2):81-91
pubmed: 15857573
Cardiovasc Res. 1996 Feb;31(2):314-23
pubmed: 8730409
J Physiol. 2007 Oct 15;584(Pt 2):591-600
pubmed: 17717017
Circ Res. 1993 May;72(5):1110-23
pubmed: 8477523
Cell Calcium. 2008 Jan;43(1):59-71
pubmed: 17822759